| Literature DB >> 30109042 |
P Ravichandran1, P Sugumaran1, S Seshadri1, Altaf H Basta2.
Abstract
This work deals with optimizing the conditions of pyrolysis and type of activator to upgrade the use of Casuarina equisetifolia fruit waste (CFW) as available and a potential precursor, in production of activated carbon (AC). In this respect, the route of activation was carried out through one- and two-step pyrolysis processes, using different chemical activating agents, such as H3PO4, KOH and ZnCl2. The performance of the CFW-based ACs is assessed by estimating the physico-chemical characteristics (pH, electrical conductivity, bulk density and hardness), surface morphology and scanning electron microscopy, together with carbon yield, surface area and adsorption performance of pollutants in aqueous medium (methylene blue, iodine and molasses colour removal efficiencies). The results show that the two-step activation process was more effective than one-step activation for providing high adsorption performance CFW-based ACs. The maximum Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area 547.89 m2 g-1 was produced by using H3PO4 activating agents, and applied two-step pyrolysis. According to the American Water Work Association and based on bulk density of the investigated ACs, we recommend that most of produced ACs are suitable for treating waste water.Entities:
Keywords: Casuarina equisetifolia fruit waste; adsorption capacities; alkali and acid activators; physico-chemical characteristics; route of activation high-performance activated carbon
Year: 2018 PMID: 30109042 PMCID: PMC6083678 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Proximate, ultimate and biochemical analysis of biomass waste. (Values are mean ± s.d. of three replicates.)
| biomass waste (wt%) dry basis | |
|---|---|
| parameters | |
| proximate analysis | |
| moisture | 1.20 ± 0.32 |
| ash | 2.65 ± 0.51 |
| volatile matter | 75.81 ± 0.4 |
| fixed carbon | 19.38 ± 0.21 |
| ultimate (elemental) analysisa | |
| carbon | 43.87 |
| hydrogen | 5.34 |
| nitrogen | 1.61 |
| sulfur | 0.11 |
| oxygen | 49.07 |
| biochemical analysis | |
| cellulose | 25.52 ± 0.01 |
| hemicellulose | 18.84 ± 0.01 |
| lignin | 46.06 ± 0.01 |
aResults based on one-time analysis.
Degradation stages of non-isothermal TGA analysis of CFW.
| stage | temperature range, oC | DTG peak temperature, oC | mass change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| first | RT to <100 | 74.6 | −11 |
| second | 250–350 | 302.0 | −57 |
| third | 350–550 | 445.8 | −34 |
Figure 1.Carbon yield from CFW substrate with different activating agents and steps.
Physical and chemical properties of CFW AC samples. (Values are mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.)
| pH | EC (µS cm−1) | bulk density (g ml−1) | hardness (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| activation method/ agents | one | two | one | two | one | two | one | two |
| untreated | 7.48 ± 0.08 | 8.24 ± 0.03 | 216.15 ± 0.42 | 129.54 ± 0.97 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.62 ± 0.15 | 31.85 ± 0.15 | 25.00 ± 0.20 |
| H3PO4 | 2.83 ± 0.03 | 3.78 ± 0.02 | 370.13 ± 0.99 | 280.25 ± 0.61 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 0.67 ± 0.08 | 36.15 ± 0.05 | 29.50 ± 0.30 |
| KOH | 8.72 ± 0.02 | 7.33 ± 0.03 | 181.08 ± 1.07 | 261.23 ± 0.96 | 0.40 ± 0.06 | 0.61 ± 0.03 | 29.10 ± 0.10 | 24.00 ± 0.10 |
| ZnCl2 | 9.78 ± 0.01 | 7.55 ± 0.04 | 1962.26 ± 1.06 | 685.09 ± 0.58 | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 0.68 ± 0.26 | 08.35 ± 0.05 | 06.55 ± 0.15 |
Effect of different activation agents and methods on BET surface area of AC samplesa.
| total surface area (m2 g−1) | pore size (Å) | pore volume (cm3 g−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| activation methods/agents | one | two | one | two | one | two |
| untreated | 146.49 | 323.70 | 766.01 | 1014.28 | 0.352 | 0.375 |
| H3PO4 | 262.70 | 547.89 | 11 110.17 | 739.75 | 0.238 | 0.426 |
| KOH | 217.55 | 513.97 | 965.18 | 949.45 | 0.189 | 0.454 |
| ZnCl2 | 61.70 | 335.08 | 625.69 | 756.84 | 0.739 | 0.418 |
aResults based on one time analysis.
Figure 2.SEM micrographs of carbon samples from CFW, with magnification ×6000: (a) untreated carbon, (b) H3PO4 AC, (c) KOH AC, and (d) ZnCl2 AC.
Figure 3.Methylene blue adsorption on CFW ACs produced by (a) one step and (b) two steps.
Figure 4.Iodine removal by different CFW AC samples.
Figure 5.Molasses colour removal by different CFW AC samples. (a) One step and (b) two steps.