| Literature DB >> 35268512 |
Makoto Watanabe1, Ryuji Fukazawa1, Mitsuhiro Kamisago1, Takashi Ohkubo1, Masanori Abe1, Masami Ochi2, Takashi Nitta2, Yohsuke Ishii2, Shunichi Ogawa1, Yasuhiko Itoh1.
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for severe cardiac sequelae of Kawasaki disease (KD) complicated by myocardial ischemia is feasible even in childhood. However, no report has summarized the prognosis of CABG in preschool-aged children. Therefore, we evaluated the outcomes of seven preschool-aged children who underwent CABG for the cardiac sequelae of KD in our hospital. The median age at KD onset and CABG was 36 and 59 months, respectively. The median period from KD onset to CABG was 12 months. The median post-operative observation period was 108 months. CABG between the left internal thoracic artery and left anterior descending artery was performed in all patients. In all patients, postoperative cardiac catheter examination revealed good graft patency and no anastomotic stenosis. Further, pre-operative abnormality of coronary flow reserve returned to normal after CABG. Currently, only one patient is taking warfarin. Regarding school-life management, no patient has exercise limitations, except for one patient who had acute myocardial infarction before CABG. Further, the risk of graft stenosis or occlusion was evaluated in the included patients. However, no accidents have been reported to date, and myocardial ischemia and school-life management have improved. Thus, CABG is an effective treatment in preschool-aged children.Entities:
Keywords: CABG; RCA downsizing reconstruction; graft stenosis; kawasaki disease; preschool age
Year: 2022 PMID: 35268512 PMCID: PMC8910851 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Patient background and surgical procedure.
| Patient | Sex | Age at Onset (Months) | Age at CABG (Months) | Period from Onset to CABG (Months) | Post-Surgery Observation Period (Months) | Coronary AN | Stenosis | Thrombus | Event | Surgical Procedure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Female | 32 | 51 | 19 | 134 | LAD: 12.0 × 28 mm | No | Yes | Angina | LITA–LAD |
| B | Male | 13 | 38 | 25 | 108 | LAD: 10.0 × 20 mm | 75% LS at AN outlet | Yes | No | LITA–LAD |
| C | Male | 36 | 76 | 40 | 110 | LAD: 8.5 × 12 mm | 90% LS at AN outlet | No | No | LITA–LAD |
| D | Male | 14 | 18 | 4 | 46 | LAD: 17.5 × 40 mm | No | Yes | No | LITA–LAD |
| E | Male | 54 | 59 | 5 | 37 | LAD: 15.2 × 23 mm | 90% LS at AN outlet | No | No | LITA–LAD |
| F | Male | 50 | 62 | 12 | 115 | LMT: 19.0 × 39 mm | No | Yes | No | LITA–LAD |
| G | Male | 56 | 65 | 9 | 42 | LMT: 16.5 × 31 mm | No | Yes | AMI | LITA–LAD |
| 36 (13, 56) | 59 (18, 76) | 12 (4, 40) | 108 (37, 134) |
CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LAD, left anterior descending artery; RCA, right coronary artery; LMT, left main coronary trunk; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; LS, localized stenosis; AN, aneurysm.
Comparison of CFR, FFR, LVEF, and LV wall motion before and after CABG and the presence or absence of bypass anastomotic stenosis.
| Patient | CFR | FFR | Anastomotic Site Stenosis | LVEF (%) | LV Wall Motion Abnormalities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-CABG | Post-CABG | Pre-CABG | Post-CABG | Pre-CABG | Post-CABG | Pre-CABG | Post-CABG | ||
| A | LAD: 1.2 | LAD: 3.0 | LAD: 0.86 | LAD: 0.87 | No | 64 | 70 | Anterior septum | No |
| B | LAD: 1.9 | LAD: 2.7 | LAD: 0.56 | LAD: 0.81 | No | 62 | 60 | Anterior septum | Anterior septum |
| C | LAD: 1.6 | LAD: 3.1 | LAD: 0.59 | LAD: 0.82 | No | 68 | 75 | Septum; Apical region | No |
| D | LAD: 1.0 | LAD: 2.4 | LAD: 0.85 | No | 64 | 63 | Anterior septum; Apical region | No | |
| E | LAD: 1.6 | LAD: 2.7 | LAD: 0.65 | LAD: 0.94 | No | 70 | 74 | Anterior septum; Apical region | No |
| F | LAD: 1.3 | LAD: 2.5 | LAD: 0.94 | LAD: 0.96 | No | 69 | 72 | Anterior-lateral wall; Septum | No |
| G | LAD: 1.3 | LAD: 2.1 | LAD: 0.84 | No | AMI occurred one day after CAG | 46 | Anterior septum; Apical region | Diffuse decrease in wall motion | |
| Mean | LAD: 1.41 ± 0.30 | LAD: 2.64 ± 0.35 * | LAD: 0.7 ± 0.16 | LAD: 0.86 ± 0.05 † | 66.1 ± 3.3 | 65.7 ± 10.3 | |||
The CFR and FFR were evaluated at LAD segment 7 or RCA segment 3. * p = 0.0021, ** p = 0.0284, † p = 0.4225, †† p = 0.2801, ¶ p = 0.6674. CFR, coronary flow reserve; FFR, fraction flow reserve; LAD, left anterior descending artery; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting. LAD, left anterior descending artery; RCA, right coronary artery; LV, left ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAG, coronary angiography. Patient G had AMI a day after the cardiac catheter examination and underwent urgent CABG.
The latest CAG findings; Current medications and symptoms; Exercise limitation.
| Patient | Latest CAG Findings | Current Medications | Symptoms | Exercise Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | LITA–LAD patency good | Aspirin | No | E |
| B | LITA–LAD patency good | Aspirin, Candesartan | No | E |
| C | LITA–LAD patency good | Aspirin, Candesartan | No | E |
| D | LITA–LAD patency good | Aspirin, Candesartan | No | E |
| E | LITA–LAD patency good | Aspirin, Candesartan | No | E |
| F | LITA–LAD patency good | Warfarin, Aspirin, | No | E (Restricted from contact sports) |
| G | LITA–LAD patency good | Aspirin, Enalapril, Carvedilol | No | D |
Exercise Limitation: A: Home care/hospitalization is required; B: Able to go to school but unable to exercise; C: Able to participate in “light exercise for average students of the same age”; D: Able to participate in “moderate exercise for average students of the same age”; and E: Able to participate in “vigorous exercise for average students of the same age” CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; LITA, left internal thoracic artery; LAD, left anterior descending artery; RCA, right coronary artery; LMT, left main coronary trunk; LS, localized stenosis; AN, aneurysm.
Figure 1CAG of patient E before and after 92 months of CABG and RCA downsizing reconstruction. (A,B) are before CABG. And (C,D,E) are after 92 months of CABG. (A), LCA angiography. Giant aneurysm 19.0 × 39 mm were located. No stenotic lesion was observed; (B), RCA angiography. Giant aneurysm RCA: 12.0 × 42 mm was observed; (C), LCA angiography. LAD was occluded. LCx arose from aneurysm; (D), LITA angiography. LITA–LAD bypass patency was good. (E); RCA angiography. The shape of RCA became good after downsizing reconstruction, remaining 8.8 × 12 mm dilation at proximal. Wash-out of the contrast medium became smooth. CAG, coronary angiogram; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; LCA, left coronary artery; RCA, right coronary artery; LAD, left anterior descending; LCx, left circumflex; LITA, left intimal thoracic artery.
Figure 2CAG of patient F before and after 18 months of CABG and RCA downsizing reconstruction. (A,B) are before CABG. And (C,D,E) are after 18 months of CABG. (A), LCA angiography. Giant aneurysm 16.5 × 31 mm were located. No stenotic lesion was observed; (B), RCA angiography. Giant aneurysm RCA, sized 10.0 × 37 mm, and medium aneurysm, sized 7.0 × 17 mm, were observed; (C), LCA angiography. LCA was occluded. LCx showed segmental stenosis after this; (D), LITA angiography. LITA–LAD bypass patency was good. (E); RCA angiography. The shape of RCA became good after downsizing reconstruction. Wash-out of the contrast medium became smooth.