Literature DB >> 35266139

Factors associated with federally qualified health center financial performance.

Daniel Jung1, Elbert S Huang2, Eric Mayeda3, Rachel Tobey4, Eric Turer5, James Maxwell6, Allison Coleman7, Jennifer Saber7, Susan Petrie7, Joshua Bolton8, Daniel Duplantier8, Hank Hoang8, Alek Sripipatana8, Robert Nocon9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To understand factors associated with federally qualified health center (FQHC) financial performance. STUDY
DESIGN: We used multivariate linear regression to identify correlates of health center financial performance. We examined six measures of health center financial performance across four domains: margin (operating margin), liquidity (days cash on hand [DCOH], current ratio), solvency (debt-to-equity ratio), and others (net patient accounts receivable days, personnel-related expenses). We examined potential correlates of financial performance, including characteristics of the patient population, health center organization, and location/geography. DATA SOURCES: We use 2012-2017 Uniform Data System (UDS) files, financial audit data from Capital link, and publicly available data. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We focused on health centers in the 50 US states and District of Columbia, which reported information to UDS for at least 1 year between 2012 and 2017 and had Capital link financial audit data. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: FQHC financial performance generally improved over the study period, especially from 2015 to 2017. In multivariate regression models, a higher percentage of Medicaid patients was associated with better margins (operating margin: 0.06, p < 0.001), liquidity (DCOH: 0.67, p < 0.001; current ratio: 0.28, p = 0.001), and solvency (debt-to equity ratio: -0.08, p = 0.004). Moreover, a staffing mix comprised of more nonphysician providers was associated with better margin (operating margin: 0.21, p = 0.001) and liquidity (current ratio: 1.12, p < 0.001) measures. Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition was also associated with better liquidity (DCOH: 19.01, p < 0.001; current ratio: 4.68, p = 0.014) and solvency (debt-to-equity ratio: -2.03, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The financial health of FQHCs improved with provisions of the Affordable Care Act, which included significant Medicaid expansion and direct funding support for health centers. FQHC financial health was also associated with key staffing and operating characteristics of health centers. Maintaining the financial health of FQHCs is critical to their ability to continuously provide affordable and high-quality care in medically underserved areas.
© 2022 Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicaid; Medicaid expansion; access to health care; federally qualified health center; financial management

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35266139      PMCID: PMC9441282          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.734


  21 in total

1.  The relationship between quality of care and financial performance in nursing homes.

Authors:  Robert Weech-Maldonado; Gerald Neff; Vince Mor
Journal:  J Health Care Finance       Date:  2003

2.  Community health center efficiency: the role of grant revenues in health center efficiency.

Authors:  Peter R Amico; Jon A Chilingerian; Martijn van Hasselt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Patient experience and hospital profitability: Is there a link?

Authors:  Jason P Richter; David B Muhlestein
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2017 Jul/Sep

4.  A Comparison of Nurse Practitioners, Physician Assistants, and Primary Care Physicians' Patterns of Practice and Quality of Care in Health Centers.

Authors:  Ellen T Kurtzman; Burt S Barnow
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Premium subsidies, the mandate, and Medicaid expansion: Coverage effects of the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Molly Frean; Jonathan Gruber; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Primary Care Practice Finances In The United States Amid The COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sanjay Basu; Russell S Phillips; Robert Phillips; Lars E Peterson; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  The patient centered medical home. A systematic review.

Authors:  George L Jackson; Benjamin J Powers; Ranee Chatterjee; Janet Prvu Bettger; Alex R Kemper; Vic Hasselblad; Rowena J Dolor; R Julian Irvine; Brooke L Heidenfelder; Amy S Kendrick; Rebecca Gray; John W Williams
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of Changes in Quality, Utilization and Cost Following the Colorado Multi-Payer Patient-Centered Medical Home Pilot.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Shehnaz Alidina; Mark W Friedberg; Sara J Singer; Diana Eastman; Zhonghe Li; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Continued rise in the use of mid-level providers in US emergency departments, 1993-2009.

Authors:  David F M Brown; Ashley F Sullivan; Janice A Espinola; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-23

10.  Impact of Nurse Practitioner Practice Regulations on Rural Population Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Judith Ortiz; Richard Hofler; Angeline Bushy; Yi-Ling Lin; Ahmad Khanijahani; Andrea Bitney
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-15
View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors associated with federally qualified health center financial performance.

Authors:  Daniel Jung; Elbert S Huang; Eric Mayeda; Rachel Tobey; Eric Turer; James Maxwell; Allison Coleman; Jennifer Saber; Susan Petrie; Joshua Bolton; Daniel Duplantier; Hank Hoang; Alek Sripipatana; Robert Nocon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.734

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.