Literature DB >> 35266128

Association of Vaccination with the Persistence of Post-COVID Symptoms.

Juan P Wisnivesky1,2, Usha Govindarajulu3, Emilia Bagiella3, Ruchir Goswami1, Minal Kale1, Kirk N Campbell4, Kristin Meliambro4, Zijian Chen5, Judith A Aberg6, Jenny J Lin7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who have had COVID-19 often report persistent symptoms after resolution of their acute illness. Recent reports suggest that vaccination may be associated with improvement in post-acute symptoms. We used data from a prospective cohort to assess differences in post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC) among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients.
METHODS: We used data from a cohort of COVID-19 patients enrolled into a prospective registry established at a tertiary care health system in New York City. Participants underwent a baseline evaluation before COVID-19 vaccines were available and were followed 6 months later. We compared unadjusted and propensity score-adjusted baseline to 6-month change for several PASC-related symptoms and measures: anosmia, respiratory (cough, dyspnea, phlegm, wheezing), depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; COVID-19-related and other trauma), and quality-of-life domains among participants who received vs. those who did not receive COVID-19 vaccination.
RESULTS: The study included 453 COVID-19 patients with PASC, of which 324 (72%) were vaccinated between the baseline and 6-month visit. Unadjusted analyses did not show significant differences in the baseline to 6-month change in anosmia, respiratory symptoms, depression, anxiety, PTSD, or quality of life (p > 0.05 for all comparisons) among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients. Similar results were found in propensity-adjusted comparisons and in secondary analyses based on the number of vaccine doses received.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that COVID vaccination is not associated with improvement in PASC. Additional studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying PASC and to develop effective treatments.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID vaccination; long COVID; post-acute sequelae of COVID; symptoms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35266128      PMCID: PMC8906626          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07465-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


INTRODUCTION

The majority of patients with COVID-19 recover within a few weeks following their illness, but several studies suggest that a significant number of patients may continue to have persistent symptoms for several weeks to months after resolution of their acute illness.[1-5] The syndrome of post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC), sometimes termed long COVID or chronic COVID, is still not yet well defined but appears to affect a broad spectrum of patients, from those who were asymptomatic or experienced a mild case of acute COVID to those severely ill who required hospitalization and even treatment in intensive care units. Several factors, such as older age, female sex, obesity, greater number of comorbidities and more severe acute illness, increase the risk for development of PASC.[6, 7] Common symptoms associated with PASC include persistent fatigue, dyspnea, anosmia, cognitive dysfunction (‘brain fog’), anxiety, depression and insomnia.[4, 7, 8] Recent anecdotal reports have found that some patients with PASC describe improvement or resolution of their persistent symptoms after receiving the COVID vaccine.[9-12] An early study from Britain that included 66 post-COVID patients found that those who were vaccinated showed improvement or resolution of their PASC symptoms or a decrease in worsening symptoms compared to matched participants who were unvaccinated.[12] However, to date, there has been no large study to assess the effect of COVID vaccines on symptom change in patients who had COVID-19. Consequently, we undertook this study to assess whether vaccination was associated with resolution of or improvement in PASC symptoms in a prospective registry of COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

We used data from a prospective cohort of patients enrolled into an institutional Post-COVID-19 Registry at the Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) in New York City. Study participants were recruited between July 20, 2020, and February 26, 2021, and had completed a baseline and 6-month follow-up interview. All participants were unvaccinated at the time of the baseline interview. Eligible participants were ≥ 18 years of age, had laboratory-documented infection with SARS-CoV-2, spoke English or Spanish, and received care at MSHS. Additionally, we limited the study to participants who reported at least one PASC symptom at baseline. Exclusion criteria included history of dementia. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and all participants signed informed consent. We collected sociodemographic data at baseline including age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, household income and education. We also obtained information regarding the date of COVID-19 diagnosis and the site of acute COVID-19 care (outpatient, emergency room [ER], impatient or intensive care unit [ICU]). Pre-COVID-19 comorbidities (hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], and cancer) and smoking history were ascertained using questions from the National Health Interview Survey.[13] We obtained measures of height and weight and calculated body mass index for each participant. Data regarding vaccination included vaccine type (Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson), date of vaccination, and number of doses received. We also linked registry data to information from the electronic medical record as an additional source of vaccination status. To ensure sufficient time for an immune response, individuals who had received at least one dose of the vaccine at least 2 weeks prior to the 6-month follow-up interview were coded as vaccinated. We also categorized participants according to the number of doses (none, one or two) received; COVID-19 patients that received one dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine were included in the two-dose group. The study outcomes included multiple PASC symptoms commonly reported after recovery from acute COVID-19 infection. Presence of anosmia was evaluated with a single-item 5-point Likert question (1 = no sense of smell to 5 = excellent sense of smell) adapted from the PhenX Toolkit.[14] Dyspnea with different levels of exertion was evaluated with the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale (0 = dyspnea only with strenuous exercise, 4 = dyspnea at rest), a well-validated tool used in research and clinical practice.[15, 16] Other respiratory symptoms included cough, phlegm and wheezing, which were evaluated with items from St. George’s questionnaire (0 = no symptoms at all, 4 = symptoms most days of the week).[17, 18] We used Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) to assess for symptoms of depression.[19] Anxiety symptoms were evaluated with the Generalized Anxiety Disorders-7 (GAD-7) instrument.[20, 21] Presence and severity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms were evaluated using the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5).[22] The PCL-5 was administered twice to assess for symptoms of COVID-19-related PTSD as well as PTSD related to other trauma. We used the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 v2.0 Scale to assess quality of life.[23-25] This is a validated tool with well-established population norms that provides quality-of-life scores along seven health domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social roles, and sleep (four items per domain) and an item assessing pain (score 0–10). Responses to items in each domain were summed and scored based on population norms.[23]

Statistical Analyses

We compared baseline characteristics of COVID-19 patients who received or did not receive COVID vaccination using a t test or chi-square test, as appropriate. For each outcome, we compared the mean difference from baseline to 6 months between vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients using a two-sample t test. To adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, we fitted a propensity score model including age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, income, smoking history, comorbidities, and severity of acute COVID-19. From this model, we estimated probability weights for both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals as the inverse of the probability of group assignment. We fitted a linear regression model to compare change in symptom scores in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated participants controlling for number of days since COVID-19 diagnosis and the inverse probability weights to adjust for potential confounders. Each model was limited to participants who reported symptoms at baseline for the specific PASC outcome evaluated in the analysis. We conducted secondary analyses comparing differences in PASC symptom trajectory according to the number of doses of vaccine received. With the cohort of patients included in this analysis, we estimated that the study would have > 80% power to identify a ≥ 1 unit difference (SD 1.25) in changes in dyspnea scores, ≥ 3 units difference (SD 5) in changes of depression scores, and ≥ 10 units difference (SD 10) in changes of quality-of-life scores among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Of the 1189 COVID-19 patients recruited in the post-COVID-19 registry as of the time of these analyses, 464 have completed the 6-month interview as of August 23, 2021. Of these, 11 were excluded due to missing data regarding vaccination status leaving a cohort of 453 study participants (see supplemental figure). Of these 453 participants, 324 (72%) were vaccinated and 94% of these had received one of the mRNA vaccines (62% Pfizer-BioNtech and 32% Moderna). The baseline characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients are shown in Table 1. Although unvaccinated patients were slightly more likely to be never smokers (74% vs. 65%), this was not statistically significant and there were no significant differences in age, gender, smoking history and comorbidities among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated COVID-19 patients (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). However, unvaccinated patients were more likely to be unmarried (p = 0.04), report a lower annual income (p = 0.003), and have had a shorter period from COVID-19 diagnosis to the date of the baseline interview (p = 0.001).
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of Post-Covid-19 Patients

CharacteristicVaccinatedN = 324Non-vaccinatedN = 129p value
Age, years, mean (SD)50.1 (13.4)49.7 (14.1)0.79
Female, no. (%)211 (65)83 (64)0.87
Race/ethnicity, no. (%)0.11
  White200 (62)73 (57)
  Black46 (14)31 (24)
  Asian17 (5)2 (2)
  Other55 (17)22 (17)
Latinx, no. (%)62 (19)26 (20)0.82
Married, no. (%)160 (50)43 (33)0.04
Annual income, no. (%)0.003
  < 25,00047 (16)17 (15)
  $25,000–$60,00042 (14)36 (32)
  $60,000–$150,000116 (39)38 (34)
  > $150,00095 (32)22 (20)
Never smoker, no. (%)206 (65)93 (74)0.20
Pre-Covid-19 comorbidities, no. (%)
  Hypertension102 (32)44 (34)0.59
  Coronary artery disease15 (5)3 (2)0.51
  Diabetes38 (12)15 (12)0.82
  Asthma86 (27)40 (31)0.34
  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease11 (3)4 (3)0.36
  Cancer41 (13)11 (9)0.36
Body mass index, no. (%)0.92
  Normal weight100 (31)36 (28)
  Overweight94 (29)39 (30)
  Obese110 (34)44 (34)
Time since Covid-19 diagnosis, days, mean (SD)213 (62)172 (56)< 0.001
Site of Covid-19 care, no. (%)0.11
  Outpatient132 (41)53 (41)
  Emergency room97 (30)28 (22)
  Inpatient73 (23)42 (33)
  Intensive care unit18 (6)6 (5)
Baseline Characteristics of Post-Covid-19 Patients Unadjusted analyses showed no significant difference in the mean change between baseline and 6-month follow-up in anosmia (mean difference: − 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: − 0.54 to 0.03, p = 0.08), or respiratory symptoms (p > 0.05 for all comparisons; Table 2). Similarly, mean changes in symptoms of depression (mean difference: 0.32, 95% CI: − 0.88 to 1.53, p = 0.60), anxiety (mean difference: 1.29, 95% CI: − 0.24 to 2.82, p = 0.10), COVID-19-related PTSD (mean difference: 3.41, 95% CI: − 1.82 to 8.63, p = 0.20) and PTSD due to other trauma (2.32, 95% CI: − 8.46 to 13.09, p = 0.66) were not significantly associated with vaccination status. There were no significant differences in the mean change of all quality-of-life domains between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, including fatigue (mean difference: − 1.40, 95% CI: − 3.98 to 1.18, p = 0.29), sleep (mean difference: 1.16, 95% CI: − 1.10 to 3.41, p = 0.31) and pain (− 0.84, 95% CI: − 3.19 to 1.52, p = 0.49, Fig. 1).
Table 2

Unadjusted Differences in Post-Covid Symptom Scores Among Vaccinated Compared to Unvaccinated Patients

DomainVaccinatedNon-vaccinatedDifference change vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated(95% CI)p value
BaselineMean (SD)ChangeBaselineMean (SD)Change
Anosmia (N = 163)2.44 (0.67)− 0.582.40 (0.74)− 0.33− 0.26 (− 0.54 to 0.03)0.08
Respiratory symptoms
  Dyspnea (N = 286)0.57 (0.50)− 0.090.58 (0.50)− 0.120.02 (− 0.19 to 0.23)0.83
  Cough (N = 231)2.33 (0.81)− 0.562.26 (0.85)− 0.570.003 (− 0.39 to 0.39)0.99
  Phlegm (N = 146)2.30 (0.85)− 0.822.37 (0.85)− 0.53− 0.28 (− 0.76 to 0.20)0.25
  Wheezing (N = 101)2.41 (0.78)− 0.822.46 (0.69)− 1.230.41 (− 0.27 to 1.09)0.23
Depression symptoms (N = 288)10.70 (5.02)1.8610.20 (4.05)1.530.32 (− 0.88 to 1.53)0.60
Anxiety symptoms (N = 212)9.88 (4.08)2.509.97 (5.03)1.211.29 (− 0.24 to 2.82)0.10
Covid PTSD symptoms (N = 127)40.16 (12.16)9.9938.26 (11.64)6.583.41 (− 1.82 to 8.63)0.20
Non-Covid PTSD symptoms (N = 42)34.00 (8.59)14.3844.38 (12.47)12.072.32 (− 8.46 to 13.09)0.66
Quality of life
  Physical function (N = 218)37.41 (4.65)− 4.0235.92 (4.76)− 3.07− 0.95 (− 2.96 to 1.05)0.35
  Anxiety (N = 244)62.42 (5.41)4.0762.83 (6.84)3.730.33 (− 1.98 to 2.65)0.78
  Depression (N = 171)60.56 (5.05)4.1861.94 (5.49)3.440.74 (− 1.81 to 3.29)0.57
  Fatigue (N = 261)63.36 (6.06)3.1465.51 (6.39)4.54− 1.40 (− 3.98 to 1.18)0.29
  Social roles (N = 135)58.78 (7.26)3.4956.39 (9.47)5.81− 2.32 (− 5.51 to 0.87)0.15
  Sleep (N = 171)61.20 (4.60)3.9262.56 (5.59)2.761.16 (− 1.10 to 3.41)0.31
  Pain (N = 232)62.14 (5.59)3.8663.22 (5.58)4.70− 0.84 (− 3.19 to 1.52)0.49

SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval

Figure 1

Comparison of changes in PASC symptoms on PROMIS scale between baseline and 6 months for vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated participants.

Unadjusted Differences in Post-Covid Symptom Scores Among Vaccinated Compared to Unvaccinated Patients SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval Comparison of changes in PASC symptoms on PROMIS scale between baseline and 6 months for vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated participants. Propensity score–adjusted analyses (Table 3) showed no differences in change in anosmia (mean difference: − 0.02, 95% CI: − 0.35 to 0.31), dyspnea (mean difference: 0.05, 95% CI: − 0.15 to 0.25), cough (mean difference: − 0.17, 95% CI: − 0.55 to 0.22), phlegm (mean difference: − 0.47, 95% CI: − 0.87 to 0.10) or wheezing (mean difference: − 0.16, 95% CI: − 0.83 to 0.50) among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients. Mean change in depression (mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI: − 1.18 to 1.22), anxiety (mean difference: 0.51, 95% CI: − 0.93 to 0.04), COVID-19-related (mean difference: 2.53, 95% CI: − 3.06 to 8.12) or other trauma-related (mean difference: − 2.53, 95% CI: − 12.11 to 7.04) PTSD symptoms were not associated with vaccination status (Table 3). Change in quality-of-life domain scores was also not significantly different among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients (mean difference in physical function: − 1.16, 95% CI: − 3.35 to 1.02; mean difference in anxiety: − 0.29, 95% CI: − 2.84 to 2.27; mean difference in depression: − 1.12, 95% CI: − 3.80 to 1.56; mean difference in fatigue: − 1.42, 95% CI: − 4.15 to 1.32; mean difference in social roles: − 0.17, 95% CI: − 3.18 to 2.83; mean difference in sleep: 1.51, 95% CI: − 0.86 to 3.87; and mean difference in pain: − 0.02, 95% CI: − 2.74 to 2.70).
Table 3

Adjusted Associations Between Vaccination and Post-Covid-19 Symptoms According to the Number of Doses

DomainMean difference vaccinated vs. non-vaccinated (95% CI)
Primary analysesSecondary analyses
One or two dosesOne doseTwo doses
Anosmia− 0.02 (− 0.35 to 0.31)− 0.17 (− 0.62 to 0.28)− 0.13 (− 0.42 to 0.15)
Respiratory symptoms
  Dyspnea0.05 (− 0.15 to 0.25)0.10 (− 0.20 to 0.39)− 0.06 (− 0.29 to 0.16)
  Cough− 0.17 (− 0.55 to 0.22)0.22 (− 0.27 to 0.72)− 0.32 (− 0.73 to 0.08)
  Phlegm− 0.47 (− 0.87 to 0.10)− 0.28 (− 0.92to 0.36)− 0.27 (− 0.76 to 0.21)
  Wheezing− 0.16 (− 0.83 to 0.50)− 0.30 (− 1.17 to 0.56)− 0.28 (− 0.98 to 0.42)
Depression symptoms0.02 (− 1.18 to 1.22)0.39 (− 1.15 to1.95)0.31 (− 0.95 to 1.56)
Anxiety symptoms0.51 (− 0.93 to 0.04)1.87 (− 0.01 to 3.76)0.62 (− 0.71 to 1.95)
Covid PTSD symptoms2.53 (− 3.06 to 8.12)7.58 (− 0.21 to 15.37)2.90 (− 2.13 to 7.93)
Non − Covid PTSD symptoms− 2.53 (− 12.11 to 7.04)− 11.62 (− 26.04 to 2.80)− 1.75 (− 11.85 to 8.35)
Quality of life
  Physical function− 1.16 (− 3.35 to 1.02)− 0.30 (− 2.95 to 2.36)− 0.87 (− 3.04 to 1.30)
  Anxiety− 0.29 (− 2.84 to 2.27)− 0.26 (− 3.24 to 2.72)− 0.69 (− 3.06 to 1.68)
  Depression− 1.12 (− 3.80 to 1.56)− 1.53 (− 5.09 to 2.04)1.53 (− 1.22 to 4.28)
  Fatigue− 1.42 (− 4.15 to 1.32)− 1.15 (− 4.29 to 2.00)− 1.39 (− 3.93 to 1.15)
  Social roles− 0.17 (− 3.18 to 2.83)− 0.23 (− 3.67 to 4.13)− 1.99 (− 5.11 to 1.14)
  Sleep1.51 (− 0.86 to 3.87)1.00 (− 1.72 to 3.74)1.95 (− 0.21 to 4.10)
  Pain− 0.02 (− 2.74 to 2.70)− 1.91 (− 4.74 to 0.92)− 0.40 (− 2.69 to 1.89)

CI confidence interval

Adjusted Associations Between Vaccination and Post-Covid-19 Symptoms According to the Number of Doses CI confidence interval Similarly, adjusted analyses showed no significant difference in changes in any of the outcomes when comparing patients who received one or two doses compared to those who were unvaccinated (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

In this study of 453 post-COVID patients, we did not find a significant difference in change in PASC symptoms from baseline to 6 months between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Our study is the first prospective cohort study to assess whether COVID vaccination may affect PASC symptoms. Thus, these findings suggest that while vaccination is important in providing additional immunological protection against reinfection, it does not appear to be associated with changes in PASC symptoms. Additional research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying PASC and to identify effective treatments for these patients. Although PASC is still not well defined, the National Institutes of Health convened a workshop in December 2020 to discuss current literature about this syndrome and identify knowledge gaps.[1] Studies from China, Italy and France have found that between 15 and 84% of COVID-19 patients may experience long-term symptoms.[1–5, 8, 26] These PASC symptoms,[4, 7, 8, 26] including anosmia, respiratory issues such as cough or dyspnea, depression, anxiety, cognitive dysfunction, and/or fatigue, may persist for several weeks to months after resolution of acute COVID-19. While more severe acute COVID-19 illness appears to be associated with higher risk for PASC, a few other risk factors such as being female, older, or obese, or having more comorbidities also seem to have a relationship with PASC development. [6, 7] Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain persistence of symptoms in PASC including viral reservoirs, continued inflammation, development of autoantibodies, and/or sequelae of organ damage during acute infection.[1, 26–30] SARS-CoV-2 virus particles have been found in gut enterocytes for up to 4–7 months after initial diagnosis.[28, 31] This viral reservoir may result in persistent inflammation that can then lead to the development of PASC symptoms. Persistent markers of inflammation have been found in patients up to several months after the acute illness.[32, 33] Inflammation may also induce endothelial damage and micro-thrombi formation in multiple organs which may then result in many of the observed PASC symptoms, such as dyspnea as well as cognitive dysfunction and fatigue. Finally, autoantibodies may be implicated in the development of PASC.[29, 34, 35] As such, COVID vaccination may help reduce or eliminate PASC symptoms by eradicating the viral reservoir or by resetting a dysregulated immune response to the primary infection. Several anecdotal reports have suggested that those suffering from PASC symptoms improve after receiving the COVID vaccine. However, in this larger prospective study of post-COVID patients, we did not find a significant difference in change in PASC symptoms or other objective measures between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Thus, while some may report significant improvement in PASC symptoms after vaccination, these findings were not borne out in our study population. Our study has some strengths and limitations. This is a prospective observational cohort study from one large urban city and not a randomized study to assess the effect of COVID vaccination on symptom change. Thus, we cannot exclude systematic differences among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients. However, our two groups were similar at baseline, and we used propensity score adjustment to account for baseline characteristics that might affect vaccination status. Differences in vaccine type may be a limitation in determining effect of vaccination on changes in PASC symptoms but the majority of our participants received one of the two mRNA vaccines. It is also possible that biases in reporting symptoms may have affected our results, but this appears unlikely as we used objective measures to assess symptoms at each time point and did not ask participants to report change in symptoms. Those who completed the 6-month interview may also have had more severe symptoms than those who dropped out so there is a possibility of selection bias. Finally, our study may not have sufficient power to identify small differences in some PASC symptoms among the two study groups, and because our cohort consisted of COVID-19 patients who experienced the first wave of COVID, our results may not be generalizable to others who may have been infected in later waves or different strains of the coronavirus. Strengths of this study include the prospective nature of the cohort where symptoms were collected with standardized and validated instruments. We also assessed multiple domains pertaining to commonly reported PASC symptoms. In conclusion, our study found that COVID vaccination does not appear to improve or change PASC symptoms in this large prospective cohort of patients who have recovered from COVID. While COVID vaccination remains important for additional immunological protection against reinfection, it does not appear to improve PASC symptoms or related measures in COVID-19 patients. Further studies are needed to better define the trajectory of PASC as well as to understand the pathophysiology underlying its development so that effective treatments can be developed to treat the long-term complications associated with COVID infection. (DOCX 26 kb)
  26 in total

1.  The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.

Authors:  Christy A Blevins; Frank W Weathers; Margaret T Davis; Tracy K Witte; Jessica L Domino
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2015-11-25

2.  American translation, modification, and validation of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.

Authors:  J T Barr; G E Schumacher; S Freeman; M LeMoine; A W Bakst; P W Jones
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

Authors:  Robert L Spitzer; Kurt Kroenke; Janet B W Williams; Bernd Löwe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-22

4.  Attributes and predictors of long COVID.

Authors:  Sebastien Ourselin; Tim Spector; Claire J Steves; Carole H Sudre; Benjamin Murray; Thomas Varsavsky; Mark S Graham; Rose S Penfold; Ruth C Bowyer; Joan Capdevila Pujol; Kerstin Klaser; Michela Antonelli; Liane S Canas; Erika Molteni; Marc Modat; M Jorge Cardoso; Anna May; Sajaysurya Ganesh; Richard Davies; Long H Nguyen; David A Drew; Christina M Astley; Amit D Joshi; Jordi Merino; Neli Tsereteli; Tove Fall; Maria F Gomez; Emma L Duncan; Cristina Menni; Frances M K Williams; Paul W Franks; Andrew T Chan; Jonathan Wolf
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  PROMIS measures of pain, fatigue, negative affect, physical function, and social function demonstrated clinical validity across a range of chronic conditions.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Sally E Jensen; Benjamin D Schalet; Jennifer L Beaumont; Dagmar Amtmann; Susan Czajkowski; Darren A Dewalt; James F Fries; Paul A Pilkonis; Bryce B Reeve; Arthur A Stone; Kevin P Weinfurt; David Cella
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Lixue Huang; Yeming Wang; Xia Li; Lili Ren; Xiaoying Gu; Liang Kang; Li Guo; Min Liu; Xing Zhou; Jianfeng Luo; Zhenghui Huang; Shengjin Tu; Yue Zhao; Li Chen; Decui Xu; Yanping Li; Caihong Li; Lu Peng; Yong Li; Wuxiang Xie; Dan Cui; Lianhan Shang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Geng Wang; Ying Wang; Jingchuan Zhong; Chen Wang; Jianwei Wang; Dingyu Zhang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  'The long tail of Covid-19' - The detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients.

Authors:  Ivan Doykov; Jenny Hällqvist; Kimberly C Gilmour; Louis Grandjean; Kevin Mills; Wendy E Heywood
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-11-19

8.  Functional autoantibodies against G-protein coupled receptors in patients with persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms.

Authors:  Gerd Wallukat; Bettina Hohberger; Katrin Wenzel; Julia Fürst; Sara Schulze-Rothe; Anne Wallukat; Anne-Sophie Hönicke; Johannes Müller
Journal:  J Transl Autoimmun       Date:  2021-04-16

9.  Prolonged elevation of D-dimer levels in convalescent COVID-19 patients is independent of the acute phase response.

Authors:  Liam Townsend; Helen Fogarty; Adam Dyer; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Ciaran Bannan; Parthiban Nadarajan; Colm Bergin; Cliona O'Farrelly; Niall Conlon; Nollaig M Bourke; Soracha E Ward; Mary Byrne; Kevin Ryan; Niamh O'Connell; Jamie M O'Sullivan; Cliona Ni Cheallaigh; James S O'Donnell
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 16.036

Review 10.  The SARS-CoV-2 as an instrumental trigger of autoimmunity.

Authors:  Arad Dotan; Sylviane Muller; Darja Kanduc; Paula David; Gilad Halpert; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 9.754

View more
  10 in total

1.  Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 are on the increase against the acquired immunity.

Authors:  Tomokazu Konishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  [The value of COVID-19 vaccination in the context of Long-COVID].

Authors:  Stilla Bauernfeind; Barbara Schmidt
Journal:  Inn Med (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-07

3.  The effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elke Wynberg; Alvin X Han; Anders Boyd; Hugo D G van Willigen; Anouk Verveen; Romy Lebbink; Karlijn van der Straten; Neeltje Kootstra; Marit J van Gils; Colin Russell; Tjalling Leenstra; Menno D de Jong; Godelieve J de Bree; Maria Prins
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 4.  COVID-19 Vaccine and Long COVID: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Aqsa Mumtaz; Abdul Ahad Ehsan Sheikh; Amin Moazzam Khan; Subaina Naeem Khalid; Jehanzaeb Khan; Adeel Nasrullah; Shazib Sagheer; Abu Baker Sheikh
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16

5.  Impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the risk of developing long-COVID and on existing long-COVID symptoms: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kin Israel Notarte; Jesus Alfonso Catahay; Jacqueline Veronica Velasco; Adriel Pastrana; Abbygail Therese Ver; Flos Carmeli Pangilinan; Princess Juneire Peligro; Michael Casimiro; Jonathan Jaime Guerrero; Ma Margarita Leticia Gellaco; Giuseppe Lippi; Brandon Michael Henry; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-08-27

Review 6.  The Role of Cellular Immunity in the Protective Efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.

Authors:  Zhongjie Sun; Tingxin Wu; Huangfan Xie; Yuhuan Li; Jinlan Zhang; Xuncheng Su; Hailong Qi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-09

7.  Prolonged COVID-19 symptom duration in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Vaccine Survey.

Authors:  Jonathan S Hausmann; Julia F Simard; Jeffrey A Sparks; Michael DiIorio; Kevin Kennedy; Jean W Liew; Michael S Putman; Emily Sirotich; Sebastian E Sattui; Gary Foster; Carly Harrison; Maggie J Larché; Mitchell Levine; Tarin T Moni; Lehana Thabane; Suleman Bhana; Wendy Costello; Rebecca Grainger; Pedro M Machado; Philip C Robinson; Paul Sufka; Zachary S Wallace; Jinoos Yazdany; Monique Gore-Massy; Richard A Howard; More A Kodhek; Nadine Lalonde; Laura-Ann Tomasella; John Wallace; Akpabio Akpabio; Deshiré Alpízar-Rodríguez; Richard P Beesley; Francis Berenbaum; Inita Bulina; Eugenia Yupei Chock; Richard Conway; Alí Duarte-García; Eimear Duff; Tamer A Gheita; Elizabeth R Graef; Evelyn Hsieh; Lina El Kibbi; David Fl Liew; Chieh Lo; Michal Nudel; Aman Dev Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Namrata Singh; Manuel F Ugarte-Gil
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-09

8.  Emotional Reaction to the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine: Postvaccination Decline in Anxiety and Stress among Anxious Individuals and Increase among Individuals with Normal Prevaccination Anxiety Levels.

Authors:  Rasmieh Al-Amer; Malakeh Z Malak; Hala Mohammad Ramadan Burqan; Elena Stănculescu; Sylivia Nalubega; Abdulmajeed A Alkhamees; Amin Omar Hendawy; Amira Mohammed Ali
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-31

9.  Long COVID Risk and Pre-COVID Vaccination: An EHR-Based Cohort Study from the RECOVER Program.

Authors:  M Daniel Brannock; Robert F Chew; Alexander J Preiss; Emily C Hadley; Julie A McMurry; Peter J Leese; Andrew T Girvin; Miles Crosskey; Andrea G Zhou; Richard A Moffitt; Michele Jonsson Funk; Emily R Pfaff; Melissa A Haendel; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-10-07

10.  Impact of cross-coronavirus immunity in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.

Authors:  Jonathan D Herman; Caroline Atyeo; Yonatan Zur; Claire E Cook; Naomi J Patel; Kathleen M Vanni; Emily N Kowalski; Grace Qian; Nancy A Shadick; Douglas Laffenburger; Zachary S Wallace; Jeffrey A Sparks; Galit Alter
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-09-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.