| Literature DB >> 35265297 |
Min Luo1, Yuying Hu2, Rong Bai2, Zongpei Xu3.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explore the clinical effects of Chinese medicine in the treatment of stable angina pectoris in coronary heart disease. Chinese medicine has multitarget, multilevel, and multilink effects in the treatment of coronary angina, which can significantly improve patients' symptoms. Its mechanism of action involves multiple levels such as regulating lipid metabolism, improving platelet function, antioxidant, and protecting endothelial function. The design was based on data mining to analyse the dosing pattern of modern Chinese medicine for the treatment of stable angina pectoris in coronary heart disease. The number of episodes of angina pectoris, the duration of the episodes, and the changes in the electrocardiogram before and after taking the medicine were observed and compared between the two groups. The number and duration of angina attacks ((2.23 ± 0.77) per week and (1.31 ± 0.34) min/time, respectively) in the study group were found to be significantly better than those in the control group ((3.86 ± 1.03) per week and (2.46 ± 1.21) min/time, respectively).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35265297 PMCID: PMC8901347 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3511974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Number and duration of angina attacks in the study group and control group.
| Group | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of angina pectoris attacks (times/week) | Attack time of angina pectoris (min/time) | Number of angina pectoris attacks (times/week) | Attack time of angina pectoris (min/time) | |
| Control group ( | 8.21±2.67 | 7.63±2.33 | 3.83±1.03 | 2.46±1.21 |
| Study group ( | 8.35±2.54 | 7.42±2.51 | 2.23±0.77 | 1.31±0.34 |
| T value | 0.682 | 0.773 | 3.354 | 4.645 |
|
| 0.112 | 0.04 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Comparison of ∑ST and NST values in the study and control group.
| Group | ∑ST/mm | Number of NST/leads | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
| Control group ( | 1.03±0.45 | 0.71±0.32 | 3.23±1.11 | 2.53±0.62 |
| Study group ( | 1.01±0.51 | 0.51±0.29 | 3.41±1.09 | 1.79±0.85 |
| T value | 0.696 | 4.561 | 0.792 | 4.235 |
|
| 0.078 | 0.001 | 0.12 | 0.002 |
Ideal solutions for coronary artery disease.
| Positive ideal solution | Negative ideal solution | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scale | 0.78 | 0.105 | 0.413 |
| Growth | 0.649 | 0.076 | 0.034 |
| Mobility | 0.478 | −0.234 | 0.184 |
| Balance | 0.343 | 0.05 | 0.226 |
| Energy saving level | 0.774 | 0.1 | 0.143 |
Figure 1Data potential curve.
Figure 2Different dosing patterns.