BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that depression and low social support are associated with increased morbidity and mortality for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the measurement of social support and its relation to depression. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of the present study was to identify key dimensions of existing social support and depression measures for patients with CHD using factor analysis. METHOD: Seven hundred-five patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction and either depression, low social support, or both, completed measures of several types of social support and depression. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to examine the underlying dimensions of the existing social support and depression measures, and to compare theoretically plausible models specifying the relation between the social support and depression factors. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that an approach in which smaller facets of depression are measured (somatic, cognitive/affective, anxious) and social support (perceived emotional support from intimate relationships; perceived tangible support from peripheral contacts; and the number of children, relatives, and friends in a patient's support network), may be the most optimal way to measure social support and depression in this population RMSEA = 0.05; CFI = 0.81; TLI = 0.88). CONCLUSION: Efforts to identify patients at increased psychosocial risk may be improved by screening for these subcomponents of social support and depression.
BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that depression and low social support are associated with increased morbidity and mortality for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the measurement of social support and its relation to depression. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of the present study was to identify key dimensions of existing social support and depression measures for patients with CHD using factor analysis. METHOD: Seven hundred-five patients with a recent acute myocardial infarction and either depression, low social support, or both, completed measures of several types of social support and depression. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to examine the underlying dimensions of the existing social support and depression measures, and to compare theoretically plausible models specifying the relation between the social support and depression factors. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that an approach in which smaller facets of depression are measured (somatic, cognitive/affective, anxious) and social support (perceived emotional support from intimate relationships; perceived tangible support from peripheral contacts; and the number of children, relatives, and friends in a patient's support network), may be the most optimal way to measure social support and depression in this population RMSEA = 0.05; CFI = 0.81; TLI = 0.88). CONCLUSION: Efforts to identify patients at increased psychosocial risk may be improved by screening for these subcomponents of social support and depression.
Authors: N Frasure-Smith; F Lespérance; G Gravel; A Masson; M Juneau; M Talajic; M G Bourassa Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-04-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Douglas A Raynor; Michael F Pogue-Geile; Thomas W Kamarck; Jeanne M McCaffery; Stephen B Manuck Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: R B Williams; D A Marchuk; K M Gadde; J C Barefoot; K Grichnik; M J Helms; C M Kuhn; J G Lewis; S M Schanberg; M Stafford-Smith; E C Suarez; G L Clary; I K Svenson; I C Siegler Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2001 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: J C Barefoot; B H Brummett; N E Clapp-Channing; I C Siegler; P P Vitaliano; R B Williams; D B Mark Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2000-08-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Heather S Lett; James A Blumenthal; Michael A Babyak; Andrew Sherwood; Timothy Strauman; Clive Robins; Mark F Newman Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Matthew E Dupre; Hanzhang Xu; Bradi B Granger; Scott M Lynch; Alicia Nelson; Erik Churchill; Janese M Willis; Lesley H Curtis; Eric D Peterson Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Matthew E Dupre; Alicia Nelson; Scott M Lynch; Bradi B Granger; Hanzhang Xu; Erik Churchill; Janese M Willis; Lesley H Curtis; Eric D Peterson Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: Yaakov S Green; Alexandra M Hajduk; Xuemei Song; Harlan M Krumholz; Samir K Sinha; Sarwat I Chaudhry Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Hanzhang Xu; Heather R Farmer; Bradi B Granger; Kevin L Thomas; Eric D Peterson; Matthew E Dupre Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2021-01-12
Authors: Aderonke A Akinkugbe; Dina T Garcia; Carlos S Smith; Tegwyn H Brickhouse; Maghboeba Mosavel Journal: J Dent Educ Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 2.264