Literature DB >> 35265278

"6 Anatomical Landmarks" Technique for Satisfactory Free-Hand Orbital Reconstruction With Standard Preformed Titanium Mesh.

Gabriele Canzi1, Federica Corradi2, Giorgio Novelli2, Alberto Bozzetti2, Davide Sozzi2.   

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objective: Resolution of clinical signs and symptoms following orbital fractures depends on the accurate restoration of the orbital volume. Computer-Assisted procedures and Patient Specific Implants represent modern solutions, but they require additional resources. A more reproducible option is the use of standard preformed titanium meshes, widely available and cheaper; with their use quality of results is proportional to the accuracy with which they are positioned. This work identifies 6 reproducible and constant anatomical landmarks, as an intraoperative guide for the precise positioning of titanium preformed meshes.
Methods: 90 patients treated at the Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Niguarda Trauma Center, Milan, for unilateral orbital reconstruction (January 2012 to December 2018), were studied. In all cases reconstruction was performed respecting the 6 proposed anatomical landmarks. The outcomes analyzed are: post-operative CT adherence to the 6 anatomical markers and symmetry achieved respect to controlateral orbit; number/year of re-interventions and duration of surgery; resolution of clinical defects (at least 12-months follow-up); incidence of complications.
Results: Satisfactory results were obtained in terms of restoration of orbital size, shape and volume. Clinical defects early recovered with a low incidence of complications and re-interventions. Operating times and radiological accuracy have shown a progressive improvement during years of application of this technique. Conclusions: The proposed "6 anatomical landmarks" is an easy free-hand technique that allows everyone to obtain high levels of reconstructive accuracy and it should be a skill of all surgeons who deal with orbital reconstruction in daily clinical activity.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy and orbital surgery; orbital fracture; orbital reconstruction; titanium mesh; titanium preformed meshes

Year:  2021        PMID: 35265278      PMCID: PMC8899354          DOI: 10.1177/19433875211007614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  25 in total

1.  Increasing the accuracy of orbital reconstruction with selective laser-melted patient-specific implants combined with intraoperative navigation.

Authors:  Majeed Rana; Christopher H K Chui; Maximillian Wagner; Ruediger Zimmerer; Madiha Rana; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Transconjunctival approach in orbital traumatology: a review of 56 cases.

Authors:  Giorgio Novelli; Luca Ferrari; Davide Sozzi; Fabio Mazzoleni; Alberto Bozzetti
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Orbital fracture repair outcomes with preformed titanium mesh implants and comparison to porous polyethylene coated titanium sheets.

Authors:  Michelle Y Peng; Shannath L Merbs; Michael P Grant; Nicholas R Mahoney
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Comparison of the Outcomes of Complex Orbital Fracture Repair with and without a Surgical Navigation System: A Prospective Cohort Study with Historical Controls.

Authors:  Emanuele Zavattero; Guglielmo Ramieri; Fabio Roccia; Giovanni Gerbino
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  The accuracy of patient specific implant prebented with 3D-printed rapid prototype model for orbital wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Young Chul Kim; Woo Shik Jeong; Tae-Kyung Park; Jong Woo Choi; Kyung S Koh; Tae Suk Oh
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  Computer-assisted therapy in orbital and mid-facial reconstructions.

Authors:  A Schramm; M M Suarez-Cunqueiro; M Rücker; H Kokemueller; K-H Bormann; M C Metzger; N-C Gellrich
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.547

7.  The CFI score: Validation of a new comprehensive severity scoring system for facial injuries.

Authors:  Gabriele Canzi; Elena De Ponti; Giorgio Novelli; Fabio Mazzoleni; Osvaldo Chiara; Alberto Bozzetti; Davide Sozzi
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Preformed vs intraoperative bending of titanium mesh for orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  E Bradley Strong; Scott C Fuller; David F Wiley; Janina Zumbansen; M D Wilson; Marc C Metzger
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  A prospective multicenter study to compare the precision of posttraumatic internal orbital reconstruction with standard preformed and individualized orbital implants.

Authors:  Rüdiger M Zimmerer; Edward Ellis; Gregorio Sanchez Aniceto; Alexander Schramm; Maximilian E H Wagner; Michael P Grant; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Edward Bradley Strong; Majeed Rana; Lim Thiam Chye; Alvaro Rivero Calle; Frank Wilde; Daniel Perez; Frank Tavassol; Gido Bittermann; Nicholas R Mahoney; Marta Redondo Alamillos; Joanna Bašić; Jan Dittmann; Michael Rasse; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Accuracy and predictability in use of AO three-dimensionally preformed titanium mesh plates for posttraumatic orbital reconstruction: a pilot study.

Authors:  Paolo Scolozzi; Armen Momjian; Joris Heuberger; Elene Andersen; Martin Broome; Andrej Terzic; Bertrand Jaques
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.