Literature DB >> 25981837

Increasing the accuracy of orbital reconstruction with selective laser-melted patient-specific implants combined with intraoperative navigation.

Majeed Rana1, Christopher H K Chui2, Maximillian Wagner3, Ruediger Zimmerer3, Madiha Rana4, Nils-Claudius Gellrich5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Advances in technology have allowed increasing degrees of accuracy in the treatment of orbital deformities. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of pre-bent titanium mesh (PBTM) and selective laser-melted patient-specific implants (PSIs) in unilateral orbital reconstruction after traumatic injury. The authors hypothesized that selective laser-melted PSIs would more accurately reconstruct the orbit.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 34 cases of primary reconstruction of unilateral orbital fractures treated using selective laser-melted PSIs (group 1, n = 17) or PBTM (group 2, n = 17) was performed. The primary outcome measurements were orbital volume excess and the anterior, medial, and posterior intraorbital angles. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the difference in orbital volume and angular deviation between the 2 groups. The level of statistical significance was set at .05. All P values were 2-sided.
RESULTS: The comparison of mean values for the 2 groups showed significant differences for the anterior angle (PBTM: mean, 11.3; standard deviation [SD], 1.8; PSI: mean, 4.1; SD, 0.7; P = .001), but not the medial (PBTM: mean, 11.6; SD, 2.0; PSI: mean, 8.2; SD, 1.9; P = .170) and posterior (PBTM: mean, 10.8, SD, 2.8; PSI: mean, 8.2, SD, 1.4; P = .760) angles between the unaffected and reconstructed orbits. The postoperative difference in volume between the unaffected and reconstructed orbits differed significantly between the 2 study groups (PBTM: mean, 0.6; SD, 0.1; PSI: mean, 0.4; SD, 0.1; P = .029).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that complex orbital fractures can be reconstructed with an even higher degree of accuracy with selective laser-melted PSIs than with PBTM.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25981837     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  18 in total

1.  Commentary on: The Role of Postoperative Imaging after Orbital Floor Repair.

Authors:  Paul N Manson
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-05-15

Review 2.  Current Strategies in Post-traumatic Orbital Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Jan Dittmann; Simon Spalthoff; Philipp Jehn; Frank Tavassol; Rüdiger Zimmerer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-06-12

3.  "6 Anatomical Landmarks" Technique for Satisfactory Free-Hand Orbital Reconstruction With Standard Preformed Titanium Mesh.

Authors:  Gabriele Canzi; Federica Corradi; Giorgio Novelli; Alberto Bozzetti; Davide Sozzi
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-04-06

Review 4.  3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Adeeb Zoabi; Idan Redenski; Daniel Oren; Adi Kasem; Asaf Zigron; Shadi Daoud; Liad Moskovich; Fares Kablan; Samer Srouji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Primary Orbital Reconstruction with Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of Patient-Specific Implants (PSIs): An Overview of 96 Surgically Treated Patients.

Authors:  Majeed Rana; Henriette L Moellmann; Lara Schorn; Julian Lommen; Madiha Rana; Max Wilkat; Karsten Hufendiek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Digital planning and individual implants for secondary reconstruction of midfacial deformities: A pilot study.

Authors:  Paris Liokatis; Yoana Malenova; Florian-Nepomuk Fegg; Selgai Haidari; Monika Probst; Marko Boskov; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Matthias Troeltzsch; Florian-Andreas Probst
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-04

7.  Computer-Assisted Secondary Orbital Reconstruction.

Authors:  Daman D Singh; Lara Schorn; E Bradley Strong; Michael Grant; Alexander Schramm; Karsten Hufendiek; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Majeed Rana
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-07-09

Review 8.  Titanium-Based Hip Stems with Drug Delivery Functionality through Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Martin B Bezuidenhout; Dimitar M Dimitrov; Anton D van Staden; Gert A Oosthuizen; Leon M T Dicks
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Quantitative Assessment of Orbital Implant Position--A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Ruud Schreurs; Leander Dubois; Alfred G Becking; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Management of orbital fractures: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Jennings R Boyette; John D Pemberton; Juliana Bonilla-Velez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.