Literature DB >> 35265180

Postoperative stiffness after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Mohammad Ghoraishian1, Brian W Hill1, Thema Nicholson1, Matthew L Ramsey1, Gerald R Williams1, Surena Namdari1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rate and risk factors for stiffness after reverse shoulder arthroplasty and the ramifications on the patient-reported outcomes. Method: A consecutive series of patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively followed for one year. Passive range of motion was measured preoperatively and at regular intervals postoperatively. Patients with passive forward elevation of less than 100° or passive external rotation of less than 30° were defined as stiff. Radiographic parameters and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores were collected.
Results: Seventy-six patients were available for review. The prevalence of postoperative stiffness following reverse shoulder arthroplasty was 47% at three months, 31% at six months, and 25% at one year. Preoperative shoulder stiffness was associated with three-month postoperative stiffness only. In patients with one-year stiffness, smaller (p = 0.03) and less lateralized glenospheres (p = 0.024) were more common. Stiffness was not associated with one-year patient-reported outcome scores.
Conclusion: Stiffness is common after reverse shoulder arthroplasty and often improves at one-year after surgery. Implant design and selection may be important determinants of passive range of motion. While stiffness does not appear to influence patient-reported outcome scores, one of four patients will potentially have stiffness one year following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Level of evidence: Level III; retrospective study.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder stiffness; implant design; patient outcomes; patient satisfaction; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; risk factors

Year:  2020        PMID: 35265180      PMCID: PMC8899328          DOI: 10.1177/1758573220967312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shoulder Elbow        ISSN: 1758-5732


  27 in total

Review 1.  Shoulder stiffness and rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Rocco Papalia; Francesco Franceschi; Sebastiano Vasta; Andrea Gallo; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion.

Authors:  G Daniel G Langohr; Joshua W Giles; George S Athwal; James A Johnson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Comparing daily shoulder motion and frequency after anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  G Daniel G Langohr; John P Haverstock; James A Johnson; George S Athwal
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Effects of glenosphere positioning on impingement-free internal and external rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xinning Li; Zakary Knutson; Daniel Choi; Daniel Lobatto; Joseph Lipman; Edward V Craig; Russell F Warren; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to long-term stiffness?

Authors:  Bradford O Parsons; Konrad I Gruson; Darwin D Chen; Alicia K Harrison; James Gladstone; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Impact of glenosphere size on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 297 shoulders.

Authors:  Brent Mollon; Siddharth A Mahure; Christopher P Roche; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Establishing maximum medical improvement following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff deficiency.

Authors:  Brandon C Cabarcas; Anirudh K Gowd; Joseph N Liu; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Brandon J Erickson; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis.

Authors:  Jay D Keener; Brendan M Patterson; Nathan Orvets; Alexander W Aleem; Aaron M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Influence of Glenosphere Design on Outcomes and Complications of Reverse Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cassandra Lawrence; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08-10

Review 10.  Complications Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Tear Repair: A Systematic Review of Terms and Definitions With Focus on Shoulder Stiffness.

Authors:  Laurent Audigé; Raphael Blum; Andreas M Müller; Matthias Flury; Holger Durchholz
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.