Literature DB >> 30030030

Establishing maximum medical improvement following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff deficiency.

Brandon C Cabarcas1, Anirudh K Gowd1, Joseph N Liu1, Gregory L Cvetanovich1, Brandon J Erickson1, Anthony A Romeo1, Nikhil N Verma2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since US Food and Drug Administration approval of the reverse prosthesis in 2003, the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States has risen dramatically. With increasing demand, efforts have shifted from traditional volume-based health care models to more patient-centered care. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to establish the time point of maximum medical improvement (MMI) following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across multiple postoperative time points following rTSA. Established minimal clinically important difference values for PROMs specific to shoulder arthroplasty were used to determine significant clinical improvement. The time point beyond which significant improvement did not occur was established as MMI.
RESULTS: MMI occurred at 1 postoperative year following rTSA. When preoperative measures were compared with 1-year postoperative outcomes, all but 1 PROM demonstrated significant clinical improvement (P < .001). There were no significant improvements between any 2 subsequent time points beyond 1 year (P > .050). Range of motion significantly improved between preoperative and 1-year levels (P < .001). No PROMs or range-of-motion parameters significantly improved beyond 1 year (P > .999).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients achieved MMI at 1 postoperative year following rTSA. Patients showed rapid improvements in subjective symptoms within the first 3 months and continued to gradually improve until 1 year. Surgeons should counsel patients with these evidence-based expectations for clinical recovery, particularly the time frame of expected improvements in pain, function, and range of motion, as well as risks of and plans of action for postoperative complications.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; maximum improvement; maximum medical improvement; rotator cuff; rotator cuff tear arthropathy; shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30030030     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

Review 1.  Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

2.  Postoperative stiffness after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mohammad Ghoraishian; Brian W Hill; Thema Nicholson; Matthew L Ramsey; Gerald R Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-10-25

3.  Different Designs of Proximal Femoral Stems for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mid-Term Clinical and Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Akhil Katakam; Shayan Hosseinzadeh; Tyler J Humphrey; Austin Collins; David Shin; Christopher M Melnic; Charles Bragdon; Hany S Bedair
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-19

4.  Return to work following shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Simon P Lalehzarian; Avinesh Agarwalla; Joseph N Liu
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-18

5.  When do patients truly reach maximal medical improvement after undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty? The incidence and clinical significance of pain and patient-reported outcome measure improvement.

Authors:  Robert N Matar; Tyler J Gardner; Farzaan Kassam; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-29

6.  Subscapularis Repair During Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Stem-Based Double-Row Repair: Sonographic and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Yousef Shishani; Meghan E Bishop; Midhat Patel; Stacy Jones; Anthony A Romeo; Evan S Lederman; Reuben Gobezie
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-03-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.