The Impact of Health Policy on Patients' Awareness of the Risks Associated with Obesity: An International Multicenter Study in Poland and Germany.

Background: Recent studies indicate that the treatment of obesity is unsuccessful. The cause of this situation is that patients are not sufficiently educated about therapeutic methods and the health consequences of not treating obesity. Moreover, obesity prevention strategies differ significantly between EU countries. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to examine and compare the level of obesity-related knowledge and illness perception among obese patients from Poland and Germany.
Methods: A prospective cross-sectional international multicentre study was conducted. The study included 564 subjects above 18 years old (210 German patients and 354 Polish patients) with obesity. A validated custom-made questionnaire was used to evaluate obesity-related knowledge. Patient illness perception was evaluated using Polish and German language versions of the standardized Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ).
Results: Obese patients from Germany had significantly higher level of obesity-related knowledge than patients from Poland (22.01 ± 4.68 vs 19.17 ± 6.59, p<0.0001). Obesity-related knowledge was associated with the patient's education, patient participation in therapeutic educational programs, patient's perception of the illness, age and the number of healthcare professionals involved in the patient's treatment process.
Conclusion: The level of obesity-related knowledge among both Polish and German patients is unsatisfactory. This study suggests that health education is required to facilitate informed choices and support the use of cognitive approaches educating patients on the health consequences of obesity.

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), both overweight and obesity are abnormal or excessive fat accumulation, which is a risk to health. In the definition a body mass index (BMI) is used, which helps to describe a person as an overweight if BMI is over 25 kg/m2, and as an obese if it is over 30 kg/m2.1

The prevalence of obesity worldwide, including in the European Union (EU) countries, is currently considered one of the major public health problems.2–4 Obesity has been described by the WHO as an important risk factor for numerous diseases, including glucose and lipid disorders, some types of neoplasm, atherosclerosis and its consequences, eg, coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and stroke5,6 Recent studies indicate that the most common cause of unsuccessful morbid obesity treatment is a lack of cooperation between patients and physicians within the scope of compliance with behavior therapy. This has been caused by patients’ insufficient education on the therapeutic methods and the health consequences of not treating obesity.7 “Perception” seems to be a significant determinant of pro-health behavior or activities.8 Studies have shown that the number of weight loss attempts increases as the perceived susceptibility to chronic disease increases. It must be emphasized that those obese individuals who are more prone to fight overweight are usually well-educated in the field of obesity and its health consequences.9,10

According to the Health Belief Model, perception and awareness of obesity as a risk factor for many diseases is crucial for health behavior change.11,12 Numerous interventions against obesity, both individual and population-level, focused on increasing the patient’s knowledge concerning the disease, the patient’s attitudes and perception of the problem, are concentrated on lifestyle modification, including diet and physical activity. For example, in Germany, public money supports a national health promotion campaign to increase fruit and vegetable consumption and increase physical activity. Moreover, obesity prevention strategies differ significantly between EU countries. As an example, the German government allocates much more financial resources to implement therapeutic, educational programs in obesity than the Polish government.13

So far, scarcely is known on the comparison of the level of knowledge and perception of obesity among patients treated in selected EU countries.

Moreover, a limited number of studies have reported a relationship between patients’ obesity- related knowledge and illness perception.14

Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to examine and compare the level of knowledge about prevention, treatment methods and health consequences of obesity, and the perception of the illness among obese patients from Poland and Germany. The additional aim was to estimate demographic and clinical factors associated with obesity-related knowledge. The relationship between obesity-related knowledge and participation in a therapeutic education program was also examined.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

A prospective cross-sectional international multicentre study was conducted at selected health care facilities in Germany and in Poland. Data were collated prospectively from 564 consecutive patients in 4 international centers. Two health care facilities from each country was involved in the data collection process. The target group consisted of 564 patients (354 from Poland-PL and 210 from Germany-DE) above 18 years old, with diagnosed and treated obesity in the time horizon 1/2018 and 12/2019. The inclusion criteria for both groups were as follows: BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 with obesity-related comorbidity, age ≥18 years, and the ability to understand and comply with the study procedures. The attending physician decided to include every single patient in the study. All the recruited subjects were fully informed about study goals and conditions. Before the survey, they gave written informed consent to participate in the project. The Ethics Committee of the Poznan University of Medical Sciences and the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin approved the study protocol.

Study Technique

A custom-made questionnaire based on the literature related to this issue was used to evaluate obesity-related knowledge.11,15 The questionnaire comprised 46 closed questions related to the level of patients’ knowledge regarding therapeutic options, prevention, risk factors, and complications of obesity. Additionally, the questionnaire included inquiries related to awareness and participation in education programs in obesity and behavior therapy conducted by physicians or nurses. The study questionnaire was accepted by the group of five national Medical consultants in the field of obesity (three from Germany and two from Poland). In order to evaluate the psychometric properties of German and Polish versions of the questionnaire, it was pre-tested on a sample of 150 obese patients (representative sample: 75 German and 75 Poles) who had the purpose of the study explained to them. Subsequently, the questions could be revised if needed. The results of the pre-test were included in the final study since the pre-test did not yield any major modifications of the instrument. Internal consistency of the obesity-related questionnaire is, the extent to which the items are correlated—was determined by calculating Cronbach’s α. A good internal consistency (0.7≤α≤0.9) can be seen as a precondition of the fact that the summation of the single item scores to a total score is meaningful.16 Cronbach’s α was 0.82 and 0.84 for the total score among German and Polish patients, respectively.

Respondents were awarded one point for every correct response. A given patent’s overall score reflected how much they knew about obesity. A scoring system was adopted wherein scores of 23–28, 29–37, 38–46 were attributed to low, average and high levels of obesity knowledge, respectively.

Moreover, from medical records there were collected information concerning on a range of variables, including details on course of obesity, such as disease duration, current body mass index, type of bariatric Surgery performed, time elapsed since bariatric surgery, types of intervention and application areas as part of conservative treatment of morbid obesity, duration or presence of comorbid diseases. The patient’s illness perception was evaluated using Polish and German versions of the standardized Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ).17,18 The B-IPQ consists of nine items rated on a scale from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum). With the Brief IPQ, it is possible to estimate illness perception in large-scale projects and repeated measures study designs. Scores reflected the disease severity scale or how relaxed the person was concerned about the disease. The higher the score, the more a person feels threatened by the illness.19

Statistical Analysis

The quantitative parameters were presented using mean value, median, and standard deviation. Categorical data were presented as counts and percentages. Results obtained for individual study groups were compared using the Student's t-test. A comparison was performed using the Mann–Whitney test, where data did not follow the normal distribution (the Shapiro–Wilks test). More than two groups were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test with the post hoc Dunn’s test. The Chi-square test for independence was used to analyze categorical data.

The relationship between the knowledge level and study parameters was analysed using multiple regression analysis. For categorical data, the coefficient for a specified level was compared to the reference level.

The analysis was performed with the use of the TIBCO Software Inc. (2017) statistical package. Statistica (data analysis software, TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, USA, ver. 13.3 . All tests were considered significant for p<0.05.

Results

Characteristics of the Study Group

The socio-demographic characteristics of the sample are shown in Table 1. The study group included 564 patients (354 from Poland and 210 from Germany), aged 45.20 ± 15.69- PL and 45.70 ± 9.70- DE with diagnosed and treated obesity. In both groups, the majority of patients were female – 77.40%- PL and 75.24%- DE. The studied groups did not statistically differ in terms of gender, age, body mass index, degree of obesity, duration of the disease and level of education (p>0.05).

Table 1

Socio-Demographic and Somatic Differences Between Obese Patients from Poland and Germany (n=564)

		Poland	Germany	p value
Group size	Total	354	210
	Female %	77.40	75.24	0.7563
	Male %	22.60	24.76	0.5369
	Surgically treated patients n (%)	82 (23.16)	73 (34.76)
	Conservatively treated patients n (%)	272 (76.84)	137 (65.24)
Age (years)	Mean ± SD	45.20 ± 15.69	45.70 ± 9.70	0.8541
Body mass index – BMI (kg/m2)	Mean ± SD	36.92 ± 8.12	36.87 ± 10.06	0.9452
I degree of obesity BMI ≥30–34.9 kg/m2	%	27.96	27.14	0.8876
II degree of obesity BMI ≥35–39.9 kg/m2	%	29.66	25.10	0.0681
III degree of obesity BMI ≥40 (kg/m2	%	42.38	47.76	0.0741
Duration of the obesity (years)	Mean ± SD	17.67 ± 11.61	17.00 ± 10.51	0.7561
Education	Primary (%)	8.44	3.71	0.0953
	Vocational (%)	28.00	33.00	0.1641
	Secondary (%)	42.66	41.06	0.7452
	Higher (%)	20.90	22.23	0.1237
Financial situation	Definitely good (%) (income per month: >3000 EUR)	10.20	10.50	0.9456
	Good (%) (income per month: 2001–3000 EUR)	34.36	35.66	0.5632
	Average (%) (income per month: 1001–2000 EUR)	43.62	44.16	0.6569
	Bad (%) (income per month: 500–1000 EUR)	7.63	7.11	0.8962
	Definitely bad (%) (income per month: <500 EUR)	4.19	2.57	0.0956
Comorbidities	Type 2 diabetes mellitus (%)	27.11	28.57	0.4589
	Hypertension (%)	45.48	47.61	0.1253
	Dyslipidemia (%)	17.79	19.04	0.1478
	Hyperuricemia (%)	3.95	5.71	0.0635
	Metabolic syndrome (%)	13.56	16.66	0.0856
	Coronary artery disease (%)	24.85	24.76	0.7563

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Obesity-Related Knowledge Assessment

According to our comparative analysis of the patient’s obesity knowledge level based on the Mann–Whitney U-test, obese patients from Poland had much worse obesity-related knowledge than those from Germany (19.17 ± 6.59- PL vs 22.01 ± 4.68- DE, p< 0.0001) (Table 2). Patients with a low level of obesity knowledge were in the majority in both countries (94.07% PL vs 93.81% DE, p= 0.683). On the other hand, there were significantly less patients with a high level of obesity knowledge in the group of Polish subjects compared to the German ones (0.00% PL vs 1.90% DE, p=0.024).

Table 2

Assessment of the Obesity-Related Knowledge Depending on the Attended at Therapeutic Education Program Against Obesity in the Group of Obese Patients from Poland and Germany (n=564)

Level of Knowledge	Poland (n=354)			Germany (n=210)
	General Mean ± SD, Me	Patients Attended at Therapeutic Education Programs Against Obesity (%)	Patients Not Attended at Education Programs Against Obesity (%)	General Mean ± SD, Me	Patients Attended at Education Programs Against Obesity (%)	Patients Not Attended at Education Programs Against Obesity (%)
Poor	19.17 ± 6.59, 19	16.00	100.00 p<0.0001#	22.01 ± 4.68, 22 p<0.0001*	66.67	100.00 p<0.0001#
Average		84.00	0.00 p<0.0001#		23.08	0.00 p<0.0001#
Good		No observed	No observed		10.26	0.00 p<0.0001#

Notes: *Statistically significant difference: Germany versus Poland for p<0.05, #Statistically significant difference: Patients attended at education programs against obesity versus patients not attended at education program against obesity.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; Me, median.

Both in the German and Polish groups, participation in a specialist obesity-related educational program significantly contributed to the improvement of knowledge about obesity. Among patients participating in educational programs, the percentage of subjects with medium and high level of knowledge was significantly higher than in the group not participating in the educational program (p<0.0001) (Table 2). Only 7.06% of the patients from Poland and 18.57% of the patients from Germany attended a specialist education program supporting a national health promotion campaign against obesity. The most popular educational programs within the scope of obesity prevention and treatment methods, which the surveyed German patients took part in, were as follows: MMK (in German: Multimodales Therapiekonzept; in English: Concept of Multimodal Therapy) (27.27%), AOK (in German: Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse; in English: General regional health insurance) (18.18%), Obesity Balance (18.18%), Weight Watchers (18.18%), Moby Dick (9.09%) and Optifast (9.09%). In Poland, the most popular educational programs within the scope of obesity prevention and treatment methods the surveyed participants took part in were as follows: Fit2Be (60%) and Dare to be healthier – let us fight obesity! (40%).

Illness Perception Assessment

Using the Mann–Whitney U-test it was shown that from the patient’s perspective, the surveyed Polish group exhibited a significantly higher obesity perception level than the German one (43.33 ± 12.17-PL vs 37.98 ± 17.23- DE, p< 0.0001) (Table 3). Additionally, the study showed that in both groups, the level of disease perception increased as the patient’s understanding of obesity improved. In the group of obese Polish patients with an average level of obesity knowledge, the illness perception level was significantly higher than in the group of participants with a low level of knowledge (48.53 ± 11.64 vs 43.21 ± 12.23, p<0.0001). Similarly, in the group of obese patients from Germany, the lowest level of disease perception was recorded in people with low knowledge of obesity, and the highest level of disease perception was observed in people with high knowledge of obesity (35.91 ± 16.44 vs 41.11 ± 8.33, p=0.0006).

Table 3

The Influence of Obesity-Related Knowledge on Illness Perception Among Obese Patients from Poland and Germany (n=564)

Level of Knowledge	Poland (n=354)		Germany (n=210)
	Illness Perception		Illness Perception
	General Mean ± SD, Me	Illness Perception Depends on Level of Knowledge Mean ± SD, Me	General Mean ± SD, Me	Illness Perception Depends on Level of Knowledge Mean ± SD, Me
Poor	43.33 ± 12.17, 44	43.21 ± 11.64, 40 (n=333)	37.98 ± 17.23, 36 p<0.0001*	35.91 ± 16.44, 34 (n=197)
Average		48.53 ± 12.23, 46 (n=21) p<0.0001#		38.91 ± 18.46, 35 (n=9) p<0.0001#
Good		No observed (n=0)		41.11 ± 8.33, 37 (n=4) p = 0.0006#

Notes: *Statistically significant difference: Germany versus Poland for p<0.05, #Statistically significant difference to the poor level of knowledge.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; Me, median.

On the basis of the conducted research, significant differences were found between the level of disease perception and the body mass index for respondents in both the Polish and German groups. In the whole study group, the highest illness perception level was observed for patients with class III obesity (49.96 ± 10.73 PL, 44.07 ± 13.96 DE) and the lowest illness perception level was observed for patients with class I obesity (40.15 ± 11.26 PL, 32.37 ± 25.85 DE).

Identification of Sociodemographic and Clinical Factors Influencing the Levels of Obesity Knowledge

The performed multiple regression analysis for confounders influencing the level of obesity knowledge in both groups of subjects found that this level was associated with the patient’s education, patient’s perception of the illness, age and the number of healthcare professionals involved in the patient’s treatment process (p<0.05) (Table 4). The highest level of knowledge about obesity was possessed by older patients with higher education, a higher level of perception of obesity, and patients treated in specialized obesity treatment centers (where the obesity treatment process was involved: specialist doctors, nutritionists, physiotherapists, and psychologists). Obesity-related knowledge showed no significant dependence on body mass index, gender, duration of obesity nor material situation.

Table 4

Multiple Regression Analysis for the Level of Knowledge Regarding Obesity (n=564)

Variable	Coeff.	Std. Err.	Standarized Coeff.	t	p-value
Gender
Female	1.0→(ref)
Male	−0.62	0.51	−0.02	−1.21	0.227
Age	0.07	0.01	0.20	4.65	0.000
Duration of Obesity	0.04	0.02	0.09	1.79	0.079
BMI
I degree of obesity (BMI ≥ 30–34.9 kg/m2)	1.0→(ref)
II degree of obesity (BMI ≥ 35–39.9 kg/m2)	1.87	1.24	0.15	1.51	0.132
III degree of obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2)	2.32	1.23	0.21	1.89	0.060
Education
Primary	1.0→(ref)
Vocational	2.85	1.01	0.26	2.80	0.005
Secondary	4.08	1.16	0.23	3.50	0.001
Higher	4.58	1.06	0.39	4.33	0.000
Financial Situation
Definitely good (income per month:> 3000 EUR)	1.0→(ref)
Good (income per month: 2001–3000 EUR)	0.09	0.66	0.00	0.15	0.885
Average (income per month: 1001–2000 EUR)	−1.69	0.68	−0.15	−2.48	0.014
Bad (income per month: 500–1000 EUR)	−2.17	0.89	−0.13	−2.42	0.016
Definitely bad (income per month: <500 EUR)	0.28	2.02	0.00	0.14	0.89
Illness Perception:	0.05	0.01	0.14	3.26	0.001
Number of Healthcare Professionals Involved in the Patient’s Treatment Process	1.07	0.33	0.13	3.18	0.002

Discussion

The results of the performed study are innovative as they present one of the first international research reports in scientific literature within the scope of illness knowledge and perception among obese individuals treated in developed EU countries.

In the conducted study, the adopted scoring system reflects patients’ knowledge of obesity. A scoring system was adopted, wherein scores of 23–28, 29–37, 38–46 were respectively attributed to low, average and high levels of obesity knowledge. The results of studies conducted in Poland and Germany indicate that the level of patient knowledge within the scope of obesity prevention, treatment methods, and complications is insufficient. The low level of obesity knowledge had the majority of the surveyed patients both in Poland and Germany (94.07% PL vs 93.81% DE, p=0.683). Moreover, 5.93% of the Polish participants and 4.29% of the German ones had an average level of knowledge in obesity. Only 1.90% of the patients from Germany showed a high level of awareness in prevention, treatment methods, and health consequences of obesity. Nonetheless, Polish patients had a significantly lower general obesity knowledge level than their Polish counterparts (19.17 ± 6.59- PL vs 22.01 ± 4.68- DE, p<0.0001). The results obtained are consistent with those of other authors. Research carried out by Swift20 on a population of 104 obese adults from the UK also demonstrated low levels of knowledge regarding obesity’s health risk, despite the patients’ high-risk status. In the opinion by Swift et al. “health education is required to facilitate informed choices and support the use of cognitive approaches educating patients on the health and social/aesthetic consequences of obesity”. Wyleżoł et al21 assessed the knowledge level within the scope of treatment methods and the most common complications of obesity across the entire Polish population. The authors observed a non-uniform level within the measures mentioned above in the studied population. Of the respondents, 91.00% were aware of the most common complications arising from an ineffectively treated obesity, whereas only 39.80% of the surveyed Poles knew about treating obesity. Nevertheless, interesting results come from a study by Winston et al,11 which aimed to measure knowledge of the health consequences of obesity among overweight/obese black and Hispanic adults. The majority of participants were knowledgeable of the risk of hypertension (94%), diabetes (96%), high cholesterol (91%), joint pains/arthritis (89%) and sleep apnea (89%) associated with obesity, except for knowledge of the risk of breast cancer (only 53% of women).

Obesity most often contributes to the development of insulin resistance.22 In the present study, type 2 diabetes was confirmed in 27.11% of the Polish respondents and 28.57% of the German ones. Due to the high prevalence of obesity among people with diabetes, increased efforts are needed to develop and implement educational programs that focus on lifestyle changes. A study conducted by Obirikorang et al23 revealed that almost three-fourths (72%) of obese participants with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes had sufficient knowledge concerning the basic concept of obesity. In addition, nearly all of the patients (98.6%) knew a method of weight measurement, but surprisingly only 4.2% of them were aware of what the ideal body weight is. Education is needed to enable individuals to comprehend the less apparent relationship between obesity and health. Lack of obesity-related knowledge is likely to compromise patients’ abilities to make informed choices about their health.20,24 Disease-related knowledge is very important both for individual patients and for public health.25 It can improve treatment compliance and satisfaction, and reduce treatment costs.26 Obtaining appropriate disease-related knowledge could enable patients to effectively cope with themselves before they visit a doctor.27 The study previously conducted by the authors of the present research showed that appropriate knowledge about arterial hypertension impacts medication adherence and healthy lifestyle behaviors and improves hypertension treatment efficacy.28

Research to date indicate the need for health education and intervention program to increase health awareness and preventive practices against obesity. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first qualitative study in Poland and Germany examining the impact of the organization of educational programs on the increase in the level of patients’ awareness of the health risks associated with obesity. The obtained results confirmed that the participation of patients in the educational program significantly improved their level of knowledge. Patients from Germany were significantly more likely to participate in educational programs on obesity prevention and effective treatment methods. An obesity clinic in Germany which was part of that research initiated a program called “Obesity Balance” of its own accord 20 “Obesity Balance” is a 6-month obesity therapy program, made up of different modules, dedicated to patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 with comorbidities. “Obesity Balance” includes modules such as nutrition therapy (6 meetings), movement therapy (12 sessions), and psychoeducation (6 meetings). A doctor oversees the program. Specialists from various fields involved with the program are constantly in touch with one another.29 WHO has identified patient education and counseling as leading obesity intervention strategies as a direct approach and an adjunct to medical and surgical methods. Many studies clearly showed that medical professionals who care for obese individuals feel obligated to emphasize the health consequences of excessive body mass.30,31 In many countries, health care professionals’ duty to educate obese patients on the methods of treatment and health risks associated with obesity is clearly outlined in The Management Obesity Care Pathway.32

The present study revealed that the level of obesity-related knowledge was associated with patient education, patient participation in therapeutic educational programs, patient perception of the illness, age and the number of healthcare professionals involved in the patients’ treatment process. This study represents the first reliable compendium of scientific knowledge on identifying multiple sociodemographic and clinical factors significantly affecting patients’ obesity knowledge. Research carried out by Winston11 has shown that obesity risk knowledge was not associated with past weight loss. Winston et al11 claimed that being aware of health risks helps initiate the weight loss process, although it does not indicate which patient would be successful in reducing weight. The study showed that the risk knowledge score was strongly associated with racial/ethnic factors, age, and gender. The present study and this mentioned above revealed that the most important factors contributing to patient obesity-related knowledge are patient participation in a therapeutic educational program and involvement of health care professionals in the patient education process. Increasing the number of healthcare professionals involved in treating patients increases the patient’s chances of receiving health advice.

The performed study has shown that the level of illness perception was significantly higher for obese patients from Poland as compared to obese German participants. This means that Polish patients felt more threatened by the illness than German ones. The level of illness perception was associated with patient’s obesity-related knowledge and body mass index. Patient awareness of health risks associated with excess body weight gives rise to anxiety associated with the loss or acute deterioration of health. A lower level of illness perception among obese patients from Germany than patients from Poland may stem from the fact that there are support groups for obese patients in German obesity treatment centers where the study was conducted. The “Obesity Balance” therapeutic program, implemented at the Charite hospital, also includes psychoeducation on changing patients’ behavior and learning to cope with various emotional situations.29 According to the Health Belief Model, illness perception is a crucial predictor of health behavior change. Based on this model, the development of tailored behavior change strategies requires understanding patients’ perceived risk of disease.11,12 Studies to date have shown that the number of weight loss attempts increases together with an increase in illness perception.9,10

However, our study has some limitations. The most important limitation is the fact that to assess the obesity-related knowledge, a validated, custom-made questionnaire meeting the research hypotheses was used. The questionnaire was developed following a standardized protocol that consisted of literature review, focused group discussions, and expert opinion. Nevertheless, independent Cronbach’s α was 0.82 and 0.84 for the total score of the German and Polish versions of the questionnaire, respectively, indicating good internal consistency. Another limitation of the study is a lack of homogeneity of the study group’s gender. Women predominated in both groups of respondents, which is most probably caused by the fact that more women than men tend to undergo weight loss surgery and enter any type of obesity treatment in general.33 However, this paper is a reliable and comprehensive source of knowledge regarding the impact of health policy on patients’ awareness of the risks associated with obesity. Therefore, it can meet the extensive information needs of health care decision-makers and the broader medical community (including doctors, pharmacists, nutritionists, physiotherapists, and psychologists).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the level of obesity-related knowledge among both Polish and German patients was unsatisfactory. Obesity-related knowledge was associated with patient participation in therapeutic, educational programs, patients’ perception of the illness, age, and the number of healthcare professionals involved in a patient’s treatment process.

This study suggests that health education is required to facilitate informed choices and support the use of cognitive approaches educating patients on the health consequences of obesity. The research provides a scientific basis for health care decision-makers in Poland about the need to increase the number of professional educational programs for patients organized by health care in proper nutrition, treatment methods, prevention, and complications of obesity. In Germany, existing educational programs should be improved to increase patient awareness.