Literature DB >> 29777042

Rates of infection after colonoscopy and osophagogastroduodenoscopy in ambulatory surgery centres in the USA.

Peiqi Wang1,2, Tim Xu3, Saowanee Ngamruengphong1, Martin A Makary4,5, Anthony Kalloo1, Susan Hutfless1,2,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Over 15 million colonoscopies and 7 million osophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs) are performed annually in the USA. We aimed to estimate the rates of infections after colonoscopy and OGD performed in ambulatory surgery centres (ASCs).
DESIGN: We identified colonoscopy and OGD procedures performed at ASCs in 2014 all-payer claims data from six states in the USA. Screening mammography, prostate cancer screening, bronchoscopy and cystoscopy procedures were comparators. We tracked infection-related emergency department visits and unplanned in-patient admissions within 7 and 30 days after the procedures, examined infection sites and organisms and analysed predictors of infections. We investigated case-mix adjusted variation in infection rates by ASC.
RESULTS: The rates of postendoscopic infection per 1000 procedures within 7 days were 1.1 for screening colonoscopy, 1.6 for non-screening colonoscopy and 3.0 for OGD; all higher than screening mammography (0.6) but lower than bronchoscopy (15.6) and cystoscopy (4.4) (p<0.0001). Predictors of postendoscopic infection included recent history of hospitalisation or endoscopic procedure; concurrence with another endoscopic procedure; low procedure volume or non-freestanding ASC; younger or older age; black or Native American race and male sex. Rates of 7-day postendoscopic infections varied widely by ASC, ranging from 0 to 115 per 1000 procedures for screening colonoscopy, 0 to 132 for non-screening colonoscopy and 0 to 62 for OGD.
CONCLUSION: We found that postendoscopic infections are more common than previously thought and vary widely by facility. Although screening colonoscopy is not without risk, the risk is lower than diagnostic endoscopic procedures. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory surgery center; ambulatory surgical procedures; bronchoscopy; colonoscopy; cystoscopy; epidemiology; esophagogastroduodenoscopy; healthcare associated infections; mammography; nosocomial infection; prostate cancer screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29777042     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  21 in total

Review 1.  Duodenoscope-associated infections: a review.

Authors:  Gheorghe G Balan; Catalin Victor Sfarti; Stefan Andrei Chiriac; Carol Stanciu; Anca Trifan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Same-Day vs Different-Day Elective Upper and Lower Endoscopic Procedures by Setting.

Authors:  Peiqi Wang; Susan M Hutfless; Eun J Shin; Christian Hartman; Sarah Disney; Christopher C Fain; Kathy P Bull-Henry; Daniel K Daniels; Tsion Abdi; Vikesh K Singh; Anthony N Kalloo; Martin A Makary
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Epidemiology and outcome of occult bacteremia in patients discharged from emergency departments or ambulatory units: one-year study.

Authors:  Fanny Andry; Marion Le Maréchal; Isabelle Pierre; Christine Recule; Yvan Caspar; Caroline Landelle; Olivier Epaulard; Patricia Pavese
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Comparison of patient tolerance and acceptability of magnet-controlled capsule endoscopy and flexible endoscopy in the investigation of dyspepsia.

Authors:  Foong Way David Tai; Hey Long Ching; Marion Sloan; Reena Sidhu; Mark McAlindon
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Issue.

Authors:  Anasua Deb; Abhilash Perisetti; Hemant Goyal; Mark M Aloysius; Sonali Sachdeva; Dushyant Dahiya; Neil Sharma; Nirav Thosani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Development and validation of a CT-based radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of tumor histologic grade in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jia Huang; Huasheng Yao; Yexing Li; Mengyi Dong; Chu Han; Lan He; Xiaomei Huang; Ting Xia; Zongjian Yi; Huihui Wang; Yuan Zhang; Jian He; Changhong Liang; Zaiyi Liu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Duodenoscope-Associated Infections beyond the Elevator Channel: Alternative Causes for Difficult Reprocessing.

Authors:  Gheorghe G Balan; Irina Rosca; Elena-Laura Ursu; Adrian Fifere; Cristian-Dragos Varganici; Florica Doroftei; Ioana-Andreea Turin-Moleavin; Vasile Sandru; Gabriel Constantinescu; Daniel Timofte; Gabriela Stefanescu; Anca Trifan; Catalin Victor Sfarti
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Use of ethylene-oxide gas sterilisation to terminate multidrug-resistant bacterial outbreaks linked to duodenoscopes.

Authors:  Lawrence F Muscarella
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-05

9.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing the VivaSight Double-Lumen Tube and a Conventional Double-Lumen Tube in Adult Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery Involving One-Lung Ventilation.

Authors:  Sara Larsen; Jimmy Højberg Holm; Tove Nørgaard Sauer; Claus Andersen
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2020-03

Review 10.  SFED recommendations for IBD endoscopy during COVID-19 pandemic: Italian and French experience.

Authors:  Federica Furfaro; Lucine Vuitton; Gionata Fiorino; Stephane Koch; Mariangela Allocca; Daniela Gilardi; Alessandra Zilli; Ferdinando D'Amico; Simona Radice; Jean-Baptiste Chevaux; Marion Schaefer; Stanislas Chaussade; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 73.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.