Literature DB >> 35262685

Reply: Risk of contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in ART.

I Demeestere1,2, E Van den Abbeel3, A Delbaere1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35262685      PMCID: PMC9383612          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.353


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We thank Vajta for raising an important point regarding the conclusion of our manuscript (Kteily ). Out of the context of the paper, we agree that the sentence ‘no additional measures to prevent staff or cross-patient contamination need to be implemented in the IVF and andrology laboratories’ could be considered as too reassuring in the general context of the pandemic. In our discussion, we discussed the need for the implementation of additional procedures for asymptomatic patients, assuming that all IVF centers already apply the ‘good manufacturing practice’ principles, independently of the COVID-19 pandemic (www.eshre.eu/guidelines). The risk of cross-contamination during ART procedures, including the risk of accidental or external contamination of liquid nitrogen (LN2), is present for many viruses and is extensively discussed in the literature. However, we would note that the use of sterile LN2 and straw decontamination before semen warming mentioned by Vajta et al. are considered as ‘other precautions that can be taken to avoid or limit contamination’ if standard precautions such as the use of high secure straws or vapor N2 cannot be secured (World Health Organization, 2021). Similarly, Pomeroy and Schiewe (2020) suggested the use of UV disinfected LN2 in case of open devices systems. Finally, the opinion paper published by international laboratory managers actually questioned the use of sterile LN2 for sample washing at warming (Hickman ). Nevertheless, we agree that the risk of contamination of LN2 through SARS-CoV-2 survival on surfaces and aerosol remains uncertain and requires further investigation. To reduce this risk, prevention measures have been implemented in all health institutions, including IVF centers, to reduce the risk of patients–staff and staff–staff contamination. Several scientific societies including ESHRE provide guidance regarding sanitary measures in IVF clinics. ESHRE published recommendations on triage questionnaire and testing strategies with updates according to the pandemic evolution as well as general sanitary measures such as the room disinfection procedures, distancing and the wearing of masks and gloves (https://www.eshre.eu/Europe/Position-statements/COVID19). Regarding IVF laboratory activities, the main principle is to strictly follow good laboratory practice (www.eshre.eu/guidelines) such as the use of high security straws and/or vapor phase storage tanks and pay particular attention to reduce exposure to native follicular fluid and sperm as much as possible by dilution and by using of individual closed containers (https://www.eshre.eu/Europe/Position-statements/COVID19). Our study confirmed that no additional measures should be taken to insure the safely handling of human material from asymptomatic patients in the IVF laboratory.

Conflict of interest

A.D. and I.D. received a grant from Ferring for the study.
  4 in total

1.  Managing the IVF laboratory during a pandemic: international perspectives from laboratory managers.

Authors:  Cristina Hickman; Shaun Rogers; Guoning Huang; Steven MacArthur; Marcos Meseguer; Daniela Nogueira; Rafael Portela; Laura Rienzi; Timothy Sharp; Hong Ye
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Risk of contamination of semen, vaginal secretions, follicular fluid and ovarian medulla with SARS-CoV-2 in patients undergoing ART.

Authors:  K Kteily; D Pening; P Diaz Vidal; M Devos; J Dechene; A Op de Beeck; A Botteaux; S Janssens; E Van den Abbeel; O Goldrat; A Delbaere; I Demeestere
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Risk of contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in ART.

Authors:  Gábor Vajta; Catello Scarica; Lodovico Parmegiani
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.353

4.  Cryopreservation and IVF in the time of Covid-19: what is the best good tissue practice (GTP)?

Authors:  Kimball O Pomeroy; Mitchel C Schiewe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.412

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.