Literature DB >> 35262670

Risk of contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in ART.

Gábor Vajta1,2, Catello Scarica3, Lodovico Parmegiani4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35262670      PMCID: PMC9383554          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.353


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We read with interest the article by Kteily and colleagues regarding the non-detectability of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA in semen, follicular fluid, vaginal secretions and residual medulla in asymptomatic patients who undergo ART (Kteily ). Their study focused only on the presence of viruses in patients’ residual material samples. However, based on their findings, they curiously concluded that ‘no additional measures to prevent staff or cross-patient contamination need to be implemented in the IVF and andrology laboratories’. This statement is far too general, not justified by the specific finding of authors, and may create a false and dangerous feeling of security both for patients and the staff. Cross-contamination issues in assisted reproduction are not restricted to physical contact with infected samples but involve other standard processes and activities. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic aggravated these dangers considerably, including but not restricted to standard procedures of cryopreservation applied in the majority of IVF cycles. As already discussed in this journal (Parmegiani and Vajta, 2021), contamination of liquid nitrogen and nitrogen vapour (LN2/NV) may occur at any step from manufacturing to final use, including transport, storage, distribution, preparation for cryopreservation and all stages of the procedure. Airborne contaminants such as SARS-CoV-2 can come into contact with LN2/NV and remain cryopreserved (Parmegiani ). Irrespective of a possible impact directly on gametes and embryos, the risk of cross-contamination from LN2/NV exists and may cause general symptoms, serious disease, death and further spreading (Scarica ). This fact has been acknowledged recently by many authors; they suggested implementing ‘good manufacturing’ practices in ART, including the use of single-personalized-disposable vitrification containers (Maggiulli ); the sterilization of liquid nitrogen before use (Arav, 2020; Alteri ); and the washing of cryopreserved specimens with sterile LN2 before thawing/warming (Hickman ; Shapiro ). Even the Sixth Edition (June 2021) of the “WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen” suggests (i) the sterilization of LN2, (ii) the decontamination of cryopreserved specimens before warming and (iii) the periodic refilling of dewars/tanks with sterile LN2 (World Health Organization, 2021). Last but not least, some scientists cited by Kteily et al. for articles published a decade ago have since changed their minds regarding the negligibility of contamination risk. They now suggest taking precautions for the safe use of liquid nitrogen (Pomeroy and Schiewe, 2020). Accordingly, while we congratulate the authors for the interesting research article, we suggest reconsidering their general conclusion and focusing their statement on the area that has been investigated in their present work.

Conflict of interest

L.P. reports fees from Origio-Coopersurgical and is a shareholder of Nterilizer Srl. G.V. is a shareholder and CSO at VitaVitro Biotech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
  10 in total

1.  Covid-19: Airborne transmission is being underestimated, warn experts.

Authors:  Owen Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-07-07

2.  COVID-19 in liquid nitrogen: a potential danger still disregarded.

Authors:  Lodovico Parmegiani; Gábor Vajta
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Managing and preventing blood-borne viral infection transmission in assisted reproduction: a Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Heather Shapiro; Laila Zaman; V Logan Kennedy; Nicola Dean; Mark H Yudin; Mona Loutfy
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Managing the IVF laboratory during a pandemic: international perspectives from laboratory managers.

Authors:  Cristina Hickman; Shaun Rogers; Guoning Huang; Steven MacArthur; Marcos Meseguer; Daniela Nogueira; Rafael Portela; Laura Rienzi; Timothy Sharp; Hong Ye
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  SARS-CoV-2 persistence at subzero temperatures.

Authors:  Catello Scarica; Lodovico Parmegiani; Laura Rienzi; Attilio Anastasi; Danilo Cimadomo; Francesca Gioia Klinger; Emanuele Licata; Laura Sosa Fernandez; Lucia De Santis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Risk of contamination of semen, vaginal secretions, follicular fluid and ovarian medulla with SARS-CoV-2 in patients undergoing ART.

Authors:  K Kteily; D Pening; P Diaz Vidal; M Devos; J Dechene; A Op de Beeck; A Botteaux; S Janssens; E Van den Abbeel; O Goldrat; A Delbaere; I Demeestere
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Assessment and management of the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in an IVF laboratory.

Authors:  Roberta Maggiulli; Adriano Giancani; Gemma Fabozzi; Lisa Dovere; Luisa Tacconi; Maria Giulia Amendola; Danilo Cimadomo; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Cryopreservation and IVF in the time of Covid-19: what is the best good tissue practice (GTP)?

Authors:  Kimball O Pomeroy; Mitchel C Schiewe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  A recommendation for IVF lab practice in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Amir Arav
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Reply: COVID-19 in liquid nitrogen: a potential danger still disregarded.

Authors:  Alessandra Alteri; Valerio Pisaturo; Edgardo Somigliana; Paola Viganò
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The actual impact of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic on IVF activity: a survey across Italian ART centers.

Authors:  Giulia Scaravelli; Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti; Gianluca Gennarelli; Luca Mencaglia; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Roberto De Luca; Danilo Cimadomo; Roberta Spoletini; Vincenzo Vigiliano; Pier Paolo Sileri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Reply: Risk of contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in ART.

Authors:  I Demeestere; E Van den Abbeel; A Delbaere
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.353

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.