Literature DB >> 35261080

In-hospital mortality in SARS-CoV-2 stratified by gamma-glutamyl transferase levels.

Moudhi Alroomi1, Rajesh Rajan2, Ahmad Alsaber3, Jiazhu Pan3, Mohammed Abdullah1, Hassan Abdelnaby4,5, Wael Aboelhassan6, Noor AlNasrallah7, Bader Al-Bader8, Haya Malhas9, Maryam Ramadhan10, Soumoud Hussein11, Naser Alotaibi7, Mohammad Al Saleh8, Kobalava D Zhanna12, Farah Almutairi8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigates in-hospital mortality amongst patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its relation to serum levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT).
METHODS: Patients were stratified according to serum levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (GGT<50 IU/L or GGT≥50 IU/L).
RESULTS: A total of 802 participants were considered, amongst whom 486 had GGT<50 IU/L and a mean age of 48.1 (16.5) years, whilst 316 had GGT≥50 IU/L and a mean age of 53.8 (14.7) years. The chief sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission were contact (366, 45.7%) and community (320, 40%). Most patients with GGT≥50 IU/L had either pneumonia (247, 78.2%) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (85, 26.9%), whilst those with GGT<50 IU/L had hypertension (141, 29%) or diabetes mellitus (DM) (147, 30.2%). Mortality was higher amongst patients with GGT≥50 IU/L (54, 17.1%) than amongst those with GGT<50 IU/L (29, 5.9%). More patients with GGT≥50 required high (83, 27.6%) or low (104, 34.6%) levels of oxygen, whereas most of those with GGT<50 had no requirement of oxygen (306, 71.2%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that GGT≥50 IU/L (odds ratio [OR]: 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-3.45, p=0.009), age (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.07, p<0.001), hypertension (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.19-3.63, p=0.011), methylprednisolone (OR: 2.96, 95% CI: 1.74-5.01, p<0.001) and fever (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.15-3.68, p=0.016) were significant predictors of all-cause cumulative mortality. A Cox proportional hazards regression model (B = -0.68, SE =0.24, HR =0.51, p = 0.004) showed that patients with GGT<50 IU/L had a 0.51-times lower risk of all-cause cumulative mortality than patients with GGT≥50 IU/L.
CONCLUSION: Higher levels of serum GGT were found to be an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; gamma-glutamyl transferase; in-hospital mortality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35261080      PMCID: PMC8993645          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


INTRODUCTION

Amongst cases of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19), 60% of patients have deranged liver diseases.  Many studies have shown that 2–11% of patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) have an underlying liver disease. In SARS‐CoV‐2, deranged liver function is considered a marker of the severity of the disease. , ,  Gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) is considered a specific diagnostic biomarker of hepatic cholangiocytic activity. , SARS‐CoV‐2‐related liver injury in relation to cholangiocytic activity can be assessed by analysing GGT serum levels. GGT levels are elevated in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, which is mostly attributed to the immune‐mediated response and cytotoxicity. ,

METHODS

Study design and subjects

This study examined 802 patients with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, including both Kuwaitis and non‐Kuwaitis aged 18 years or older. Patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study between 26 February and 8 September 2020. [Figure 1.] All the data were obtained from electronic medical records from two tertiary care hospitals in Kuwait: Jaber Al‐Ahmed Hospital and Al Adan General Hospital. , , An electronic case‐record form (CRF) was used for data entry.
FIGURE 1

Study flowchart

Study flowchart SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was confirmed by a positive result of reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) using a swab of the nasopharynx. The care of all patients was standardized according to a protocol established by the Ministry of Health in Kuwait. SARS‐CoV‐2 patients were stratified according to serum levels of GGT (GGT<50 IU/L and GGT≥50 IU/L). The Standing Committee For the Coordination of Health and Medical Research at the Ministry of Health in Kuwait waived the requirement of informed consent and approved the study (Institutional review board number 2020/1422). GGT measurement was carried out in biochemistry laboratories in Jaber Al‐Ahmed and Al Adan General Hospitals. Patient serum and plasma samples were handled by the laboratory technicians. Quantitative measurement of GGT is reported by Beckman Coulter AU analysers, which is a kinetic colour test. Method of the machine based on the guidelines of the International Federation for Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). The lowest measurable value of the test, representing the tests’ sensitivity, was approximated at 2 U/L. Estimates of precision are according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidance; the coefficient of variation was less than 5%. According to the study hospital protocol, biochemistry laboratory results would usually be reported in the electronic medical records on the first days of admission. Blood samples were collected by a nurse on the same day of the report. We documented this one‐time point result for each study participant admitted with a confirmed COVID‐19 diagnosis. Hence, the GGT results in our study reflect the baseline laboratory profile. Our study analysed GGT on admission as a predictor for COVID‐19‐related mortality. Other GGT‐related predictors, such as those related to the treatment effect or effect of hospitalization, were beyond the scope of the study.

Definitions

The primary outcome measured was SARS‐CoV‐2‐related mortality as defined by ICD‐10 code U07.1. The secondary outcome measures were the duration of hospital stay and the need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). The following clinical and laboratory variables were collected: sociodemographic determinants, co‐morbidities, clinical presentations, laboratory results, medications received in hospital, oxygen requirement and durations of ICU and in‐hospital stays. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of restrictive or obstructive disease were considered in the chronic lung disease category. The immunosuppression category was defined as patients on immunosuppressive therapy. The requirement of oxygen was considered ‘none’, ‘low’, or ‘high'. Patients who were on oxygen via a nasal cannula or a nonrebreather mask were classified as the low requirement category. Those who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), invasive ventilation, noninvasive ventilation or high‐flow oxygen were grouped in the high requirement category.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data in the form of the frequency, percentage, mean ± standard deviation (SD) and median ±interquartile range (IQR). Pearson's χ2 test was performed to determine the factors associated with the GGT cohorts (GGT<50 IU/L, GGT≥50 IU/L). Multivariable logistic regression was used to check the impacts of GGT, age, hypertension, methylprednisolone and fever on mortality. The relationship between GGT (GGT<50 IU/L, GGT≥50 IU/L) and mortality was assessed using Cox regression analysis and a Kaplan–Meier survival curve. An alpha level of 5% was used to check the significance of the results. SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) were used to conduct the statistical analyses of the data.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the COVID‐19 patients are shown in Table 1. A total of 802 hospitalized patients were enrolled in the study and stratified based on GGT<50 IU/L and GGT≥50 IU/L. The ratio of females to males was 297:504. The average age of patients with GGT≥50 IU/L was 53.8 ± 14.7 years, opposed to that of patients with GGT <50 IU/L (48.1 ± 16.5 years).
TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics of COVID‐19 patients stratified by serum GGT levels

[ALL]GGT <50 IU/LGGT ≥50 IU/L p value N
N = 802 N = 486 N = 316
Age, mean ± SD, years50.3 (16.0)48.1 (16.5)53.8 (14.7)<0.001802
BMI, mean ± SD, kg/m2 29.2 (6.47)28.8 (6.65)29.9 (6.09)0.090482
Sex:
Female297 (37.1%)193 (39.8%)104 (32.9%)0.058801
Male504 (62.9%)292 (60.2%)212 (67.1%)
Smoking:
Current smoker31 (19.5%)21 (20.2%)10 (18.2%)0.898159
Ex‐smoker16 (10.1%)11 (10.6%)5 (9.09%)
Never smoked112 (70.4%)72 (69.2%)40 (72.7%)
Source of transmission:
Community320 (40.0%)160 (32.9%)160 (50.8%)<0.001801
Contact366 (45.7%)236 (48.6%)130 (41.3%)
Health care worker22 (2.75%)14 (2.88%)8 (2.54%)
Hospital acquired11 (1.37%)5 (1.03%)6 (1.90%)
Imported82 (10.2%)71 (14.6%)11 (3.49%)
Hypertension274 (34.2%)141 (29.0%)133 (42.1%)<0.001802
DM273 (34.0%)147 (30.2%)126 (39.9%)0.006802
CVD66 (8.23%)46 (9.47%)20 (6.33%)0.148802
Chronic lung disease72 (8.98%)38 (7.82%)34 (10.8%)0.195802
Chronic kidney disease40 (4.99%)21 (4.32%)19 (6.01%)0.363802
Immunocompromised host15 (1.87%)6 (1.23%)9 (2.85%)0.167802
Pneumonia444 (55.4%)197 (40.5%)247 (78.2%)<0.001802
ARDS128 (16.0%)43 (8.85%)85 (26.9%)<0.001802
ICU admission131 (16.3%)44 (9.05%)87 (27.5%)<0.001802
ICU duration of stay (days) IQR14.0 [2.00;65.2]14.0 [2.00;66.2]13.5 [1.18;62.0]0.615132
Admission to discharge (days) IQR16.0 [3.00;52.2]16.0 [3.00;49.0]17.0 [3.00;60.8]0.028793
Mortality83 (10.3%)29 (5.97%)54 (17.1%)<0.001802

The values are n (%) unless specified otherwise.

Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; BMI, body mass index; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.

Baseline characteristics of COVID‐19 patients stratified by serum GGT levels The values are n (%) unless specified otherwise. Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; BMI, body mass index; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation. The key source of COVID‐19 transmission amongst patients was either the community (320, 40%) or direct contact (366, 45.7%). More patients with GGT<50 IU/L (236, 48.6%) were affected by COVID‐19 due to contact than patients with GGT ≥50 IU/L (130, 41.3%). It is worth noting that more patients with GGT ≥50 IU/L had pneumonia (247, 78.2%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (85, 26.9%), whereas those with GGT<50 IU/L had higher rates of hypertension (141, 29%) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (147, 30.2%). More patients with GGT ≥50 IU/L had to be admitted to the ICU than patients with GGT<50 IU/L. The mortality rate of patients with GGT ≥50 IU/L (54, 17.1%) was also higher than that of patients with GGT<50 IU/L (29, 5.9%). The major significant symptoms (p < 0.001) of patients with higher GGT levels were fever (227, 71.8%) and shortness of breath (132, 41.8%), whilst those of patients with lower GGT levels were no symptoms (119, 24.5%) and dry cough (203, 41.8%) (Table 2).
TABLE 2

Signs and symptoms of COVID‐19 stratified by serum GGT levels

[ALL]GGT <50 IU/LGGT ≥50 IU/L p valueN
N = 802 N = 486 N = 316
Asymptomatic138 (17.2%)119 (24.5%)19 (6.01%)<0.001802
Headache91 (11.3%)56 (11.5%)35 (11.1%)0.935802
Sore throat82 (10.2%)52 (10.7%)30 (9.49%)0.666802
Fever448 (55.9%)221 (45.5%)227 (71.8%)<0.001802
Dry cough385 (48.0%)203 (41.8%)182 (57.6%)<0.001802
Productive cough48 (5.99%)29 (5.97%)19 (6.01%)>0.999802
SOB229 (28.6%)97 (20.0%)132 (41.8%)<0.001802
Fatigue or myalgia182 (22.7%)107 (22.0%)75 (23.7%)0.630802
Diarrhoea106 (13.2%)67 (13.8%)39 (12.3%)0.629802
Nausea55 (6.86%)28 (5.76%)27 (8.54%)0.167802
Vomiting50 (6.23%)27 (5.56%)23 (7.28%)0.403802
Change of taste or smell29 (3.62%)22 (4.53%)7 (2.22%)0.129802

The values are n (%) unless specified otherwise.

Abbreviations: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase; SOB, shortness of breath.

Signs and symptoms of COVID‐19 stratified by serum GGT levels The values are n (%) unless specified otherwise. Abbreviations: COVID‐19, coronavirus disease; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase; SOB, shortness of breath. Compared to the patients with GGT<50 IU/L, those with GGT≥50 IU/L had significantly higher platelet, white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil counts and creatinine, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), D‐dimer, high‐sensitivity (HS) serum troponin, ferritin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin and direct bilirubin levels. Moreover, patients with lower GGT (GGT<50 IU/L) had significantly higher lymphocyte counts and albumin levels (Table 3).
TABLE 3

Laboratory findings of COVID‐19 patients stratified by serum GGT levels

[ALL]GGT <50 IU/LGGT ≥50 IU/L p valueN
N = 802 N = 486 N = 316
Haemoglobin (g/L)130 [128;131]131 [128;133]129 [123;131]0.061798
Platelets (10⁹/L)259 [250;269]250 [238;261]279 [262;289]0.009797
WBC (10⁹/L)6.70 [6.50;7.00]6.20 [5.90;6.50]7.65 [7.10;8.30]<0.001796
Neutrophils count4.10 [3.90;4.40]3.60 [3.30;3.80]5.50 [4.90;6.10]<0.001795
Lymphocytes count1.50 [1.40;1.60]1.70 [1.50;1.80]1.20 [1.00;1.40]<0.001795
Creatinine (umol/L)76.0 [74.0;77.0]73.0 [71.0;75.0]81.0 [77.0;84.0]<0.001793
LDH (IU/L)290 [274;306]246 [231;270]344 [322;366]<0.001511
CRP (mg/L)40.5 [32.0;52.0]17.0 [13.0;21.0]87.0 [77.0;99.0]<0.001760
Procalcitonin (ng/mL)0.08 [0.07;0.10]0.06 [0.05;0.07]0.24 [0.18;0.41]<0.001491
D‐Dimer (ng/mL)354 [311;410]264 [250;321]467 [395;518]<0.001502
25 (OH) Vitamin D (nmol/L)40.0 [37.0;44.0]41.0 [37.0;45.0]38.0 [32.0;47.0]0.454224
Troponin I HS (ng/L)9.00 [8.00;12.0]7.00 [6.00;12.0]10.0 [8.00;15.0]0.007308
Ferritin (ng/mL)426 [387;473]322 [282;390]536 [454;659]<0.001477
Creatinine kinase (IU/L)82.5 [59.0;125]81.0 [42.0;208]88.0 [55.0;178]0.76528
ALT (IU/L)32.0 [30.0;35.0]25.0 [23.0;26.0]58.0 [51.0;66.0]<0.001802
AST (IU/L)32.0 [30.0;33.0]26.0 [24.0;27.0]49.2 [47.0;54.0]<0.001802
ALP (IU/L)69.0 [66.0;71.0]61.0 [60.0;63.0]87.0 [83.0;92.0]<0.001801
Albumin (g/L)34.9 [34.1;35.3]36.0 [35.4;36.8]32.7 [31.8;33.5]<0.001799
T. Bilirubin (umol/L)11.7 [11.3;12.1]11.2 [10.5;11.6]12.9 [12.0;13.9]<0.001802
D. Bilirubin (umol/L)2.40 [2.30;2.50]2.12 [2.00;2.20]3.00 [2.80;3.30]<0.001800

The values are median [IQR].

Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease; CRP, C‐reactive protein; D. bilirubin, direct bilirubin; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase; HS, high‐sensitivity; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; T. bilirubin, total bilirubin; WBC, white blood cells.

Laboratory findings of COVID‐19 patients stratified by serum GGT levels The values are median [IQR]. Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease; CRP, C‐reactive protein; D. bilirubin, direct bilirubin; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase; HS, high‐sensitivity; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; T. bilirubin, total bilirubin; WBC, white blood cells. Significantly more patients with GGT ≥50 IU/L had received antibiotics (214, 67.7%), methylprednisolone (84, 26.6%), dexamethasone (39, 12.3%), therapeutic anticoagulation (138, 43.7%), azithromycin (12, 3.8%), hydroxychloroquine (66, 20.9%), kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) (56, 17.7%), hydrocortisone (14, 4.4%) and current use of ACE inhibitors (39, 14.7%) than the patients with GGT<50 IU/L. Moreover, more patients with GGT≥50 IU/L required either high (83, 27.6%) or low levels of oxygen (104, 34.6%). More patients with GGT<50 IU/L had no requirement for oxygen (306, 71.2%) (Table 4).
TABLE 4

Medications administered to COVID‐19 patients stratified by serum GGT levels

[ALL]GGT <50 IU/LGGT ≥50 IU/L p valueN
N = 802 N = 486 N = 316
Antibiotics365 (45.5%)151 (31.1%)214 (67.7%)<0.001802
Methylprednisolone130 (16.2%)46 (9.47%)84 (26.6%)<0.001802
Dexamethasone60 (7.48%)21 (4.32%)39 (12.3%)<0.001802
Vitamin C effervescent tablets571 (71.2%)354 (72.8%)217 (68.7%)0.232802
Therapeutic anticoagulation233 (29.1%)95 (19.5%)138 (43.7%)<0.001802
Azithromycin18 (2.24%)6 (1.23%)12 (3.80%)0.032802
Vitamin D:
With Vit‐D299 (37.3%)193 (39.7%)106 (33.5%)0.091802
Without Vit‐D503 (62.7%)293 (60.3%)210 (66.5%)
Hydroxychloroquine111 (13.8%)45 (9.26%)66 (20.9%)<0.001802
Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir)108 (13.5%)52 (10.7%)56 (17.7%)0.006802
Tocilizumab12 (1.50%)4 (0.82%)8 (2.53%)0.072802
Hydrocortisone19 (2.37%)5 (1.03%)14 (4.43%)0.004802
Receiving ACE inhibitors70 (10.5%)31 (7.71%)39 (14.7%)0.006667
Receiving ARBs100 (15.0%)54 (13.5%)46 (17.2%)0.234668
Receiving statin192 (27.6%)107 (25.5%)85 (30.7%)0.161696
Oxygen requirements:
High oxygen requirement125 (17.1%)42 (9.77%)83 (27.6%)<0.001731
Low oxygen requirements186 (25.4%)82 (19.1%)104 (34.6%)
None420 (57.5%)306 (71.2%)114 (37.9%)

The values are n (%), unless specified otherwise.

Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase.

Medications administered to COVID‐19 patients stratified by serum GGT levels The values are n (%), unless specified otherwise. Abbreviations: ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase. The impact of GGT, age, hypertension, methylprednisolone and fever on cumulative all‐cause mortality was assessed using a multivariable logistic regression model (Table 5). Multivariable analysis showed that GGT ≥50 IU/L (odds ratio [OR]: 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20–3.45, p = 0.009), age (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03–1.07, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.19–3.63, p = 0.011), methylprednisolone (OR: 2.96, 95% CI: 1.74–5.01, p < 0.001) and fever (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.15–3.68, p = 0.016) were significantly associated with cumulative all‐cause mortality in COVID‐19 patients (Table 5). A Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to determine whether GGT had a significant effect on the hazard of mortality (Table 6). The ‘no’ category of mortality was used to indicate survival, whilst the ‘yes’ category was used to represent a hazard event. The results of the model were significant based on an alpha value of 0.05, LL =8.70, df =1 and p = 0.003, indicating that GGT was able to adequately predict the hazard of mortality. The coefficients for GGT (B = −0.68, SE =0.24, HR =0.51, p = 0.004) indicate the patients with GGT<50 IU/L had a 0.51‐times lower risk of mortality than the patients with GGT≥50 IU/L.
TABLE 5

Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for in‐hospital death in the overall study cohort

MortalityAliveDeadCrude OR (95% CI, p value)Adjusted OR (95% CI, p value)
GGT (IU/L)GGT ≥50262 (82.9)54 (17.1)3.25 (2.03–5.29, p < 0.001)2.02 (1.20–3.45, p = 0.009)
Age (n, years)Mean (SD)48.8 (15.4)63.5 (15.1)1.06 (1.05–1.08, p < 0.001)1.05 (1.03–1.07, p < 0.001)
HypertensionYes217 (79.2)57 (20.8)5.07 (3.14–8.40, p < 0.001)2.06 (1.19–3.63, p = 0.011)
MethylprednisoloneYes93 (71.5)37 (28.5)5.41 (3.33–8.79, p < 0.001)2.96 (1.74–5.01, p < 0.001)
FeverYes387 (86.4)61 (13.6)2.38 (1.45–4.04, p = 0.001)2.03 (1.15–3.68, p = 0.016)

The percentages are raw percentages. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted using the simultaneous method. The model was adjusted for GGT, age, hypertension, methylprednisolone use and fever.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation.

TABLE 6

Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Coefficients for GGT

Variable B SE 95% CI z p HR
GGT:GGT<50−0.680.24[−1.14, −0.22]−2.890.0040.51
Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for in‐hospital death in the overall study cohort The percentages are raw percentages. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted using the simultaneous method. The model was adjusted for GGT, age, hypertension, methylprednisolone use and fever. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transferase; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Coefficients for GGT Kaplan–Meier survival probability plots were obtained for GGT. Each plot represents the survival probabilities for different groups over time. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the cumulative probability of dying in the initial period was higher for patients with GGT≥50 IU/L. [Figure 2].
FIGURE 2

Kaplan–Meier survival plot of mortality according to GGT levels in patients with coronavirus disease [COVID‐19]. X‐axis: Days since admission

Kaplan–Meier survival plot of mortality according to GGT levels in patients with coronavirus disease [COVID‐19]. X‐axis: Days since admission

DISCUSSION

Our study is one of the first to concentrate on in‐hospital mortality in SARS‐CoV‐2 in specific relation to serum GGT levels. The main finding of our study is that higher levels of serum GGT (≥50 IU/L) were an independent predictor of in‐hospital mortality. Other than serum GGT levels, age, hypertension, methylprednisolone use and fever were found to be predictors of in‐hospital mortality. There were more elderly patients with GGT≥50 IU/L. ICU admissions were also higher with GGT≥50 IU/L. Other variables of liver function tests, such as ALP and ALT, were also elevated with GGT levels. The chief source of transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 amongst the patients was contact (366, 45.7%) or the community (320, 40%). Most patients with GGT≥50 IU/L had either pneumonia or ARDS. Those with GGT≥50 U/L more often required high or low levels of oxygen. Abnormal GGT levels during admission predict worse outcomes in critically ill SARS‐CoV‐2 patients. , Higher levels of GGT were associated with elderly patients.  The severity of SARS‐CoV‐2 has been observed to be higher in elderly men who have elevated GGT levels.  Worse SARS‐CoV‐2‐related prognoses and outcomes have been reported in a male cohort with elevated GGT. Elevated GGT and CRP have strong interactions with the outcomes of SARS‐CoV‐2. Elevated GGT is mostly seen in association with elevated ALP and AST in SARS‐CoV‐2. ICU admissions have been seen more often in SARS‐CoV‐2 patients with elevated serum GGT levels. Higher mortality has been reported in patients who were previously known to have had liver disease. , One‐month mortality was seen to be higher in SARS‐CoV‐2 patients with cirrhosis. Altered levels of GGT have been seen in SARS‐CoV‐2 patients and are associated with longer hospital stays. , ,

Limitations

Our study has various limitations. Unmeasured confounding factors, such as clinical comorbidities and medications, could have affected the outcomes. This Kuwaiti study included all the SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that serum GGT≥50 IU/L is an independent predictor of in‐hospital mortality in SARS‐CoV‐2 patients. The incidence of ICU admission was higher with elevated serum GGT levels. More prospective studies are required to better understand the role of serum GGT levels in predicting in‐hospital mortality in COVID‐19.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflict of interest to disclose for any author on this manuscript.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

MAR designed the study. MAR and RR participated in data analysis and wrote the manuscript. AAS and JP performed the statistical analysis and reviewed the manuscript. The remaining authors collected the data. All authors had access to the data and took responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of data analysis. All authors have read and approved the manuscript. The authors thank Dr Danah Alothman, Dr Mohamed Elmetwalli Ghazi, and Dr Dhari Alown for their support in manuscript review.

PATIENT CONSENT STATEMENT

The requirement for patient consent was waived because of the retrospective observational study design.

PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE MATERIAL FROM OTHER SOURCES

No material from other sources was included in this study.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Gamma glutamyl transferase.

Authors:  J B Whitfield
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.250

2.  Influence of age and body mass index on gamma-glutamyltransferase activity: a 15-year follow-up evaluation in a community sample.

Authors:  J B Daeppen; T L Smith; M A Schuckit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  High rates of 30-day mortality in patients with cirrhosis and COVID-19.

Authors:  Massimo Iavarone; Roberta D'Ambrosio; Alessandro Soria; Michela Triolo; Nicola Pugliese; Paolo Del Poggio; Giovanni Perricone; Sara Massironi; Angiola Spinetti; Elisabetta Buscarini; Mauro Viganò; Canio Carriero; Stefano Fagiuoli; Alessio Aghemo; Luca S Belli; Martina Lucà; Marianna Pedaci; Alessandro Rimondi; Maria Grazia Rumi; Pietro Invernizzi; Paolo Bonfanti; Pietro Lampertico
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Xiaobo Yang; Yuan Yu; Jiqian Xu; Huaqing Shu; Jia'an Xia; Hong Liu; Yongran Wu; Lu Zhang; Zhui Yu; Minghao Fang; Ting Yu; Yaxin Wang; Shangwen Pan; Xiaojing Zou; Shiying Yuan; You Shang
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 30.700

5.  In-hospital mortality in SARS-CoV-2 stratified by hemoglobin levels: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Jarallah; Rajesh Rajan; Ahmad Al Saber; Jiazhu Pan; Ahmad T Al-Sultan; Hassan Abdelnaby; Moudhi Alroomi; Raja Dashti; Wael Aboelhassan; Farah Almutairi; Mohammed Abdullah; Naser Alotaibi; Mohammad Al Saleh; Noor AlNasrallah; Bader Al-Bader; Haya Malhas; Maryam Ramadhan; Mahdy Hamza; Kobalava D Zhanna
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 6.  Liver injury during highly pathogenic human coronavirus infections.

Authors:  Ling Xu; Jia Liu; Mengji Lu; Dongliang Yang; Xin Zheng
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 8.754

7.  Liver injury in COVID-19: management and challenges.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Lei Shi; Fu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  COVID-19: Abnormal liver function tests.

Authors:  Qingxian Cai; Deliang Huang; Hong Yu; Zhibin Zhu; Zhang Xia; Yinan Su; Zhiwei Li; Guangde Zhou; Jizhou Gou; Jiuxin Qu; Yan Sun; Yingxia Liu; Qing He; Jun Chen; Lei Liu; Lin Xu
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 25.083

9.  Clinical Features of COVID-19-Related Liver Functional Abnormality.

Authors:  Zhenyu Fan; Liping Chen; Jun Li; Xin Cheng; Jingmao Yang; Cheng Tian; Yajun Zhang; Shaoping Huang; Zhanju Liu; Jilin Cheng
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Clinical characteristics of non-ICU hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and liver injury: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Hansheng Xie; Jianming Zhao; Ningfang Lian; Su Lin; Qunfang Xie; Huichang Zhuo
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 8.754

View more
  2 in total

1.  In-hospital mortality in SARS-CoV-2 stratified by the use of corticosteroid.

Authors:  Naser Alotaibi; Moudhi Alroomi; Wael Aboelhassan; Soumoud Hussein; Rajesh Rajan; Noor AlNasrallah; Mohammad Al Saleh; Maryam Ramadhan; Kobalava D Zhanna; Jiazhu Pan; Haya Malhas; Hassan Abdelnaby; Farah Almutairi; Bader Al-Bader; Ahmad Alsaber; Mohammed Abdullah
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-29

2.  In-hospital mortality in SARS-CoV-2 stratified by gamma-glutamyl transferase levels.

Authors:  Moudhi Alroomi; Rajesh Rajan; Ahmad Alsaber; Jiazhu Pan; Mohammed Abdullah; Hassan Abdelnaby; Wael Aboelhassan; Noor AlNasrallah; Bader Al-Bader; Haya Malhas; Maryam Ramadhan; Soumoud Hussein; Naser Alotaibi; Mohammad Al Saleh; Kobalava D Zhanna; Farah Almutairi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.