| Literature DB >> 35259281 |
Helen C Fraser1, Valerie Kuan2,3,4, Ronja Johnen5, Magdalena Zwierzyna6, Aroon D Hingorani3,4,6, Andreas Beyer5,7, Linda Partridge1,8.
Abstract
Genetic, environmental, and pharmacological interventions into the aging process can confer resistance to multiple age-related diseases in laboratory animals, including rhesus monkeys. These findings imply that individual mechanisms of aging might contribute to the co-occurrence of age-related diseases in humans and could be targeted to prevent these conditions simultaneously. To address this question, we text mined 917,645 literature abstracts followed by manual curation and found strong, non-random associations between age-related diseases and aging mechanisms in humans, confirmed by gene set enrichment analysis of GWAS data. Integration of these associations with clinical data from 3.01 million patients showed that age-related diseases associated with each of five aging mechanisms were more likely than chance to be present together in patients. Genetic evidence revealed that innate and adaptive immunity, the intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway and activity of the ERK1/2 pathway were associated with multiple aging mechanisms and diverse age-related diseases. Mechanisms of aging hence contribute both together and individually to age-related disease co-occurrence in humans and could potentially be targeted accordingly to prevent multimorbidity.Entities:
Keywords: age-related disease; aging; aging hallmarks; genetics; multimorbidity
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35259281 PMCID: PMC9009120 DOI: 10.1111/acel.13524
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Cell ISSN: 1474-9718 Impact factor: 11.005
FIGURE 1The “Hallmarks of Aging” expanded into a taxonomy. The nine original aging hallmarks were expanded into a taxonomy of 65 related terms and four levels. Figure adapted from Lopez‐Otin et al. (2013). Abbreviations: Table S9
FIGURE 2Summary of the methods. (a) Associating aging hallmarks (AHs) with ARDs using text mining. From 1.85 million scientific abstracts, we extracted sentences mentioning and co‐mentioning aging hallmarks and ARDs to derive a score of their association. We kept scores verified using manual curation. The scores were used to identify the top 30 ranked ARDs linked to each aging hallmark. (b) Confirming ARD‐aging hallmark associations using GWAS data and investigating enrichment of specific signaling pathways across all aging hallmarks. We identified the genes linked to each of the top 30 ARDs associated with an aging hallmark from text mining and took the union of genes, which were mapped to encoded proteins forming nine protein lists. We carried out GSEA to identify whether there was significant enrichment of GO terms related to the same aging hallmark as the ARDs were linked to in text mining. We also assessed whether there were significantly enriched signaling pathways across all aging hallmarks. (c) Association of aging hallmarks with ARD multimorbidities. The input data were the top 30 ARDs per aging hallmark from text mining and four ARD multimorbidity networks from age 50 years. We selected subnetworks of the top 30 ARDs per aging hallmark and compared the network density in these subnetworks to random expectation. (d) Associations of aging hallmarks to ARDs with incompletely understood pathogenesis or pathophysiology. We superimposed the aging hallmark‐ARD scored associations from text mining onto the four ARD multimorbidity networks and iterated until convergence. We selected the top 30 ARDs based on the score of the nodes after network propagation and identified significant subnetworks. We identified ARDs with incompletely understood pathogenesis or pathophysiology newly associated with aging hallmarks (green) in the subnetworks and explored genetic data for links to the same aging hallmark
FIGURE 3Aging hallmark‐ARD associations from text mining. (a) Aging hallmark‐ARD associations based on the logarithm of the updated Ochiai coefficient. The highest ranked ARDs are in red and lowest ranked in yellow. ARDs with no association are shown in white. (b) The top 30 ranked ARDs for each aging hallmark. 1st (dark red) to 30th (light yellow) ranked ARDs for a given aging hallmark are highlighted. ARDs not ranked in the top 30 are shown in white. Abbreviations: Table S9
Number of proteins in each aging hallmark protein list and number of proteins in each list linked to the five significant signaling pathways
| Aging hallmark | a. Total number of proteins in protein list | Number of proteins in protein list linked to signaling pathway(expected number) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b. IFN‐γ | c. T‐cell | d. T‐cell (positive regulation) | e. ERK1/2 (positive regulation) | f. intrinsic apoptotic | ||
| GI | 511 | 9 (2.7)*** | 13 (3.7)*** | 3 (0.4)** | 15 (6.0)** | 7 (1.4)*** |
| TA | 872 | 19 (4.7)**** | 21 (6.3)*** | 5 (0.7)*** | 27 (10.3)**** | 8 (2.4)*** |
| EA | 658 | 14 (3.5)**** | 20 (4.7)**** | 4 (0.5)** | 17 (7.8)** | 7 (1.8)*** |
| LOP | 817 | 16 (4.4)**** | 17 (5.9)*** | 4 (0.6)** | 26 (9.7)**** | 6 (2.2)* |
| DNS | 1212 | 20 (6.5)** | 26 (8.7)**** | 4 (1.0)* | 31 (14.3)**** | 7 (3.3)* |
| MD | 1058 | 20 (5.7)**** | 24 (7.6)*** | 5 (0.8)*** | 31 (12.5)**** | 8 (2.9)** |
| CS | 594 | 10 (3.2)** | 17 (4.3)*** | 3 (0.5)** | 16 (7.0)** | 9 (1.6)**** |
| SCE | 680 | 17 (3.7)**** | 17 (4.9)** | 4 (0.5)** | 23 (8.0)**** | 7 (1.8)*** |
| AIC | 809 | 14 (4.3)*** | 19 (5.8)*** | 3 (0.6)* | 24 (9.6)**** | 7 (2.2)** |
| Total (union of encoded proteins) | 25 | 30 | 5 | 40 | 9 | |
| Total (union of mapped ARDs) | 21 | 19 | 9 | 22 | 11 | |
We identified the genes linked to each of the top 30 ARDs associated with an aging hallmark from text mining. We took the union of genes leading to nine gene lists. Protein‐coding genes within each gene list were mapped to proteins forming nine protein lists. (a) Total number of proteins in each protein list. The associated aging hallmark from text mining represents the rows in the “aging hallmark” column (i.e., genomic instability (GI), telomere attrition (TA), epigenetic alterations (EA), loss of proteostasis (LOP), cellular senescence (CS), deregulated nutrient sensing (DNS), mitochondrial dysfunction (MD), stem cell exhaustion (SCE), and altered intercellular communication (AIC)). We next carried out GSEA followed by a search for GO terms mentioning “pathway” or “cascade,” which showed significant enrichment of five pathways across all aging hallmark protein lists represented in (b‐f). The number of proteins in each protein list linked to the GO terms: (b) “IFN‐γ‐mediated signaling pathway,” (c) “T‐cell receptor signaling pathway,” (d) “positive regulation of T‐cell receptor signaling pathway,” (e) “positive regulation of the ERK1/2 cascade,” and (f) “intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathways in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediator,” compared to the expected number (*p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001). The “total” rows show the union of proteins from all nine protein lists and the union of mapped ARDs.
FIGURE 4Significantly enriched signaling pathways across all aging hallmark protein lists. (a) p‐values of enriched signaling pathways across all aging hallmarks. We identified the genes linked to each of the top 30 ARDs associated with an aging hallmark from text mining and took the union of genes. These were mapped to encoded proteins forming nine protein lists. The associated aging hallmark from text mining represents the column labels of the heatmap. We carried out GSEA and searched for GO terms related to signaling pathways. Five signaling pathways were significantly enriched across all aging hallmark protein lists. (b‐f) The union of proteins/ genes associated with each of the five significantly enriched pathways was derived and they were linked to their associated ARDs. These are shown in the circos plots representing: (b) IFN‐γ‐mediated signaling pathway, (c) T‐cell receptor signaling pathway, (d) positive regulation of T‐cell receptor signaling pathway, (e) positive regulation of the ERK1/2 cascade, and (f) the intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediator. Abbreviations: Table S9
Network density of subnetworks of the top 30 ranking ARD nodes compared to random expectation for age categories 50–59 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years, and ≥80 years
| Aging hallmark | ARD network density | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50–59 years | 60–69 years | 70–79 years | ≥80 years | |
| Genomic instability | 0.0805 | 0.0989 | 0.0897 | 0.0782 |
| Telomere attrition | 0.1126 | 0.1218 | 0.1103 | 0.1011 |
| Epigenetic alterations | 0.0851 | 0.0759 | 0.0782 | 0.0713 |
| Loss of proteostasis | 0.0897 | 0.0805 | 0.0828 | 0.0552 |
| Deregulated nutrient sensing | 0.2598**** | 0.2644**** | 0.2368**** | 0.2207**** |
| Mitochondrial dysfunction | 0.1655* | 0.1471* | 0.1356* | 0.1080* |
| Cellular senescence | 0.1379* | 0.1494* | 0.1195* | 0.0989* |
| Stem cell exhaustion | 0.2092*** | 0.2000*** | 0.1724*** | 0.1609**** |
| Altered intercellular comm. | 0.2000*** | 0.1839** | 0.1540** | 0.1333** |
The number of times the network density from permutations (n = 20,000) was greater than or equal to the true network density for that aging hallmark was used to calculate the p‐value. The p‐value was corrected for multiple testing across the 4 age categories per aging hallmark using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure (*p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
FIGURE 5Subnetworks containing nodes representing the top 30 ranked ARDs for each aging hallmark (50–59 year age category). The (a) deregulated nutrient sensing, (b) mitochondrial dysfunction, (c) cellular senescence, (d) stem cell exhaustion, and (e) altered intercellular communication subnetworks. Nodes are colored by ARD ranking for a given aging hallmark: the 1st to 10th ranked in red, the 11th to 20th ranked in orange, and the 21st to 30th ranked in yellow. Abbreviations: Table S9