| Literature DB >> 35259182 |
Xulin Huang1, Chenping Han1, Mingkang Ma1.
Abstract
Chinese commercial pedestrian streets have developed rapidly in recent years. However, people's preferences were not sufficiently considered and reflected in the outdoor space and landscape design. With the outdoor landscapes along commercial pedestrian streets in the region south of the Five Ridges as the research objects, this study revealed the public's different preference evaluations of the landscapes under the reciprocal effects of street characteristics. The main results were as follows: (a) When arcade spaces were available, people prefer streets with taller trees and a lower planting density (50 plants/km or less). Conversely, they preferred streets with relatively low trees (3-6 m), a higher planting density (100-200 plants/km) and two or more vertical layers of plants. People did not like the way that plants are lined in the middle of a street. (b) When there were only one or two types of signage hanging, people preferred streets with a moderate planting density (50-100 plants/km); and there were three or more types of signage hanging, people preferred the plants with low linear density (50 plants/km or less) and that were arranged along one or two sides of the street. (c) When benches were available, people preferred streets with plants on one or both sides, fewer plant colours (one or two kind of colours) and better plant growth status. Specifically, the richer the vertical structure and the bigger number of colours were, the higher the preference score. This study provided design schemes to enhance the visual quality of landscapes by improving landscape characteristics in similar outdoor spaces.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35259182 PMCID: PMC8903252 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Measurement scale of outdoor spatial characteristics.
| Outdoor spatial characteristics of commercial pedestrian streets | The value of variables denoting different characteristics |
|---|---|
| Arcade space | available = 1 and unavailable = 2 |
| Number of street sequences | one sequence = 1, two sequences = 2, and three or more sequences = 3 |
| Number of signage hanging types | one type = 1, two types = 2, and three or more types = 3 |
| Benches | available = 1 and unavailable = 2 |
Measurement scale of plant characteristics.
| Plant characteristics | The value of variables denoting different characteristics |
|---|---|
| Vertical structure of plants | One layer = 1, two layers = 2, and three or more layers = 3 |
| Arrangement of plants | Along one side of the street = 1, along two sides = 2, and in the middle of the street = 3 |
| Height of trees | 3–6 m = 1, 6–12 m = 2, and 12 m or higher = 3 |
| Growth status of plants | poor = 1, intermediate = 2, and good = 3 |
| Number of colours | one kind of colour = 1, two kinds of colour = 2, and three or more kinds of colour = 3 |
| Linear density of planting | low(50 plants/km or less) = 1, intermediate(50–100 plants/km) = 2, and high(100–200 plants/km) = 3 |
Fig 1The photographs with the lowest preference scores and highest preference scores.
Correlations between landscape preferences and pedestrian street characteristics.
| Preference evaluation score | Arcade space | Number of street sequences | Number of signage hanging types | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arcade space | coefficient | -0.362 | |||
| significance | 0.028 | ||||
| Number of street sequences | coefficients | 0.021 | 0.236 | ||
| significance | 0.693 | 0.071 | |||
| Number of signage hanging types | coefficients | 0.487 | 0.051 | -0.216 | |
| significance | 0.009 | 0.634 | 0.198 | ||
| Benches | coefficients | -0.851 | 0.124 | -0.175 | -0.194 |
| significance | 0.001 | 0.258 | 0.316 | 0.067 | |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Significant predictors (outdoor space characteristics) for 25 photos’ mean preference score of each participant emerging from the stepwise multiple linear regression analysis.
| Model | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity Statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Std. Error | Beta | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
| (Constant) | 4.121 | 0.350 | 11.788 | 0.000 | ||||
| arcade space | -0.565 | 0.223 | -0.389 | -2.528 | 0.004 | 0.880 | 1.136 | |
| number of signage hanging types | 0.407 | 0.155 | 0.624 | 3.672 | 0.013 | 0.796 | 1.342 | |
| benches | -0.478 | 0.197 | -0.519 | -3.076 | 0.008 | 0.832 | 1.216 | |
a. Dependent Variable: Mean preference score.
Analysis of the relationship between plant characteristics and outdoor spatial characteristics.
| Dependent | Independent | Unstandardized | Standardized | Collinearity Statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tolerance | VIF | ||||||
| Preference evaluation (with arcade space) | Height of trees | 0.542 | 0.323 | 1.363 | 0.017 | 0.756 | 1.347 |
| Linear density of planting | -0.413 | -0.285 | -1.417 | 0.037 | 0.629 | 1.472 | |
| Preference evaluation (without arcade space) | Height of trees | -0.691 | -0.527 | -1.607 | 0.014 | 0.876 | 1.141 |
| Vertical structure of plants | 0.838 | 0.653 | 1.952 | 0.002 | 0.898 | 1.121 | |
| Arrangement of plants | -0.429 | -0.310 | -1.246 | 0.042 | 0.981 | 1.038 | |
| Linear density of planting | 0.597 | 0.481 | 1.317 | 0.012 | 0.673 | 1.376 | |
| Preference evaluation (with only one type of signage hanging) | Linear density of planting | -0.719 | -0.585 | -1.712 | 0.006 | 0.882 | 1.132 |
| Preference evaluation (with two types of signage hanging) | Linear density of planting | -0.846 | -0.583 | -1.952 | 0.003 | 0.852 | 1.163 |
| Preference evaluation (with three or more types of signage hanging) | Arrangement of plants | -0.429 | -0.261 | -1.451 | 0.024 | 0.812 | 1.421 |
| Linear density of planting | -0.856 | -0.523 | -1.746 | 0.005 | 0.842 | 1.276 | |
| Preference evaluation | Arrangement of plants | -0.617 | -0.485 | -2.374 | 0.013 | 0.841 | 1.121 |
| Number of colours | -0.319 | -0.291 | -2.105 | 0.043 | 0.823 | 1.142 | |
| Growth status of plant | 0.561 | 0.417 | 2.413 | 0.024 | 0.792 | 1.267 | |
| Preference evaluation | Vertical structure of plants | 0.518 | 0.593 | 1.852 | 0.011 | 0.719 | 1.390 |
| Number of colours | 0.592 | 0.637 | 1.246 | 0.027 | 0.683 | 1.465 | |
Fig 2Height of trees and linear density of planting.
Fig 3Arrangement of plants and vertical structure of plants.
Fig 4Linear density of planting and arrangement of plant.
Fig 5Preference evaluation under the influence of benches and plant factors Ⅰ.
Fig 6Preference evaluation under the influence of benches and plant factors Ⅱ.