Literature DB >> 35257294

Infectious SARS-CoV-2 is rarely present in the nasopharynx samples collected from Swedish hospitalized critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Jiaxin Ling1, Rachel A Hickman2,3, Robert Frithiof4, Michael Hultström4,5, Josef D Järhult3, Åke Lundkvist2, Miklos Lipcsey6,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35257294      PMCID: PMC8901093          DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-02961-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


× No keyword cloud information.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is still rapidly spreading. It is still unclear to what extent patients with COVID-19 treated at the intensive care unit (ICU) shed infectious severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Yet, this has important implications for infection control and disease management as well as for the understanding of the pathobiology of COVID-19 at the ICU [1]. Consequently, in a prospective study, we isolated SARS-CoV-2 from nasopharynx (NPH) samples from COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU with severe respiratory failure at the Uppsala University Hospital, between December 2020 and June 2021 (including the second half of the second wave, and the third wave). The study was approved by the National Ethical Review Agency (EPM; No. 2020–05,730). Informed consent was obtained from each patient, or next of kin if the patient was unable to give consent. The Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions were followed. In brief, NPH samples were collected consequently from the patients twice a week during the first 2 weeks at the ICU, and then once a week until discharge from the ICU or death. We collected 199 NPH samples from 124 patients. The NPH samples were immediately stored in 2 mL of viral transfer media (HBSS supplemented with 2% FBS, 100 µg/mL gentamicin, and 0.5 µg/mL amphotericin B) and delivered on ice to the Zoonosis Science Center the same day [2]. A total of 280μL of each sample was used for a viral qRT-PCR test based on the N and E genes of SARS-CoV-2, and 100 μL was used for virus isolation in our biosafety level 3 laboratory, as described previously [3]. Infected cells were checked for development of cytopathic effect (CPE) as compared to uninfected control cells for at least two passages. Once CPE was observed, the supernatant was collected and put in TRIzol® (Thermo Fisher, USA) for inactivation and further analysis by qRT-PCR as described earlier [4, 5]. We isolated four SARS-CoV-2 strains from four individual patients (3.2% of the cohort) as confirmed by both CPE development in Vero E6 cells and by a qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) value below 20. For data analysis, we used the lower of the two Ct values obtained by the qPCRs targeting the N and E genes, respectively, for each sample. These four culturable samples had a lower Ct median values of 22.5 (interquartile range (IQR), 21–25; Fig. 1) as compared to 32.5 (IQR, 27–36) (p < 0.01) for the non-culturable NPH samples, which was in line with other studies [6-8]. According to the recommendation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, transmission-based precautions should be taken for non-immunocompromised patients for at least 10 days from the first positive test [9]. In a previous report, 17.8% (23/129) of high-dependency or ICU patients had culturable SARS-CoV-2 virus at some time-point, and it was approximated that less than 5% have culturable virus 15 days after onset of symptoms [10]. Our findings of culturable virus in 4/124 ICU patients at least 10 days after the onset of the symptoms were similar or lower than previously reported, possibly explained by differences in case mix and the sampling time during the disease course.
Fig. 1

qRT-PCR data in patients with and without positive virus cultures of SARS-CoV-2. The lower Ct value from N gene- and E gene-based qPCR examination was plotted for each sample. The Student t test was used for comparing the groups

No differences in duration of COVID-19, demography, previous medical history, or organ function were found between the group of patients with culturable infection and the group of patients with non-culturable infections (Table 1). However, blood hemoglobin levels and red blood cell counts on ICU admission were lower (p < 0.01) among patients with culturable virus potentially resulting from SARS-CoV-2-induced hemoglobin denaturation, and aggravating hypoxemia [11]. We acknowledge that the study was limited by the low statistical power given the low number of cases with culturable SARS-CoV-2.
Table 1

Patient characteristics in patients with and without positive virus cultures of SARS-CoV-2. Data presented as median (IQR) unless otherwise stated

Virus could not be cultured (n = 120)Virus could be cultured (n = 4)
Female n (%)37 (31)1 (25)
Age (yrs)64 (54–71)74 (58–78)
Body weight92 (82–105)81 (72–102)
BMI (kg/cm2)30 (27–35)26 (24–34)
Previous medical history
   Pulmonary disease29 (24)-
   Hypertension67 (56)2 (50)
   Ischemic heart disease12 (10)-
   Diabetes mellitus31 (25)2 (50)
Organ support in the ICU
   Renal replacement therapy2 (2)-
   Invasive ventilation66 (55)1 (25)
   PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission17.3 (15.9–20.7)18 (12.4–20.2)
   Lowest PaO2/FiO2 ratio during ICU stay11.0 (8.7–12.8)10.6 (8.7–13.8)
   Vital signs on admission to the ICU
   Breathing rate (/min)28 (22–33)23 (10–29)
   Heart rate (/min)85 (75–96)67 (65–105)
   Mean arterial pressure (mmHg)90 (78–103)97 (71–102)
   Body temperature (°C)37.4 (36.9–37.9)37.8 (37.6–37.9)
   SAPS353 (47–58)37 (37–37)
   Days after symptoms onset10 (9–12)10 (7–26)
Laboratory values on ICU admission
   Blood Hemoglobin (g/L)132 (121–144)110 (96–126)*
   Plasma CRP (mg/L)129 (65–200)132 (50–259)
   Plasma Procalcitonin (µg/L)0.3 (0.1–0.6)0.1 (0.1–7.9)
   Blood WBC (× 109)7.6 (5.6–10.6)8.7 (5.7–11.8)
   Blood RBC (× 1012)4.5 (4.1–4.8)3.9 (3.3–4.2)*
   Blood Platelets (× 109)245 (182–292)197 (136–314)
   Plasma Creatinine (µmol/L)73 (61–93)72 (70–446)
Maximal laboratory values during ICU stay
   Blood Hemoglobin (g/L)145 (132–154)125 (111–139)
   Plasma CRP (mg/L)195 (130–275)224 (156–297)
   Plasma Procalcitonin (µg/L)0.5 (0.2–1)7.3 (0.4–15)
   Blood WBC (× 109)14.2 (11–17.7)16 (10.2–20.5)
   Blood RBC (× 1012)4.7 (4.3–5)4.2 (3.5–4.3)*
   Blood Platelets (× 109)444 (355–513)353 (230–588)
   Plasma Creatinine (µmol/L)80 (68–105)91 (73–588)

BMI body mass index, CRP C-reactive protein, COVID-19 coronavirus disease 2019, ICU intensive care unit, SAPS3 Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, WBC white blood cell count, RBC red blood cell count

*p < 0.05

Patient characteristics in patients with and without positive virus cultures of SARS-CoV-2. Data presented as median (IQR) unless otherwise stated BMI body mass index, CRP C-reactive protein, COVID-19 coronavirus disease 2019, ICU intensive care unit, SAPS3 Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, WBC white blood cell count, RBC red blood cell count *p < 0.05 In conclusion, we found 4 of 124 patients were shedding infectious virus up to 26 days after symptom onset, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 is rarely culturable from the nasopharynx in hospitalized critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, we could not identify specific clinical characteristics except the hemoglobin level and the red blood cell counts identifying patients with culturable SARS-CoV-2. qRT-PCR data in patients with and without positive virus cultures of SARS-CoV-2. The lower Ct value from N gene- and E gene-based qPCR examination was plotted for each sample. The Student t test was used for comparing the groups
  10 in total

1.  Predicting Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Diagnostic Samples.

Authors:  Jared Bullard; Kerry Dust; Duane Funk; James E Strong; David Alexander; Lauren Garnett; Carl Boodman; Alexander Bello; Adam Hedley; Zachary Schiffman; Kaylie Doan; Nathalie Bastien; Yan Li; Paul G Van Caeseele; Guillaume Poliquin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019.

Authors:  Roman Wölfel; Victor M Corman; Wolfgang Guggemos; Michael Seilmaier; Sabine Zange; Marcel A Müller; Daniela Niemeyer; Terry C Jones; Patrick Vollmar; Camilla Rothe; Michael Hoelscher; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Rosina Ehmann; Katrin Zwirglmaier; Christian Drosten; Clemens Wendtner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Jason Phua; Li Weng; Lowell Ling; Moritoki Egi; Chae-Man Lim; Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia; Babu Raja Shrestha; Yaseen M Arabi; Jensen Ng; Charles D Gomersall; Masaji Nishimura; Younsuck Koh; Bin Du
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 30.700

5.  Viral RNA load as determined by cell culture as a management tool for discharge of SARS-CoV-2 patients from infectious disease wards.

Authors:  Bernard La Scola; Marion Le Bideau; Julien Andreani; Van Thuan Hoang; Clio Grimaldier; Philippe Colson; Philippe Gautret; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  COVID-19: hemoglobin, iron, and hypoxia beyond inflammation. A narrative review.

Authors:  Attilio Cavezzi; Emidio Troiani; Salvatore Corrao
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2020-05-28

7.  Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Olfert Landt; Marco Kaiser; Richard Molenkamp; Adam Meijer; Daniel Kw Chu; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Marie Luisa Schmidt; Daphne Gjc Mulders; Bart L Haagmans; Bas van der Veer; Sharon van den Brink; Lisa Wijsman; Gabriel Goderski; Jean-Louis Romette; Joanna Ellis; Maria Zambon; Malik Peiris; Herman Goossens; Chantal Reusken; Marion Pg Koopmans; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-01

8.  Duration and key determinants of infectious virus shedding in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Kampen; David A M C van de Vijver; Pieter L A Fraaij; Bart L Haagmans; Mart M Lamers; Nisreen Okba; Johannes P C van den Akker; Henrik Endeman; Diederik A M P J Gommers; Jan J Cornelissen; Rogier A S Hoek; Menno M van der Eerden; Dennis A Hesselink; Herold J Metselaar; Annelies Verbon; Jurriaan E M de Steenwinkel; Georgina I Aron; Eric C M van Gorp; Sander van Boheemen; Jolanda C Voermans; Charles A B Boucher; Richard Molenkamp; Marion P G Koopmans; Corine Geurtsvankessel; Annemiek A van der Eijk
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Viral transport media for COVID-19 testing.

Authors:  Matthew J Mears; Michael J Wallace; Jacob S Yount; Lorri A Fowler; Penny S Jones; Peter J Mohler; Loren E Wold
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Mitigation of the replication of SARS-CoV-2 by nitric oxide in vitro.

Authors:  Dario Akaberi; Janina Krambrich; Jiaxin Ling; Chen Luni; Göran Hedenstierna; Josef D Järhult; Johan Lennerstrand; Åke Lundkvist
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 11.799

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.