| Literature DB >> 35256896 |
Chethana Sridhar1, Piyush Kumar Pareek2, R Kalidoss3, Sajjad Shaukat Jamal4, Prashant Kumar Shukla5, Stephen Jeswinde Nuagah6.
Abstract
Medical diagnosis is always a time and a sensitive approach to proper medical treatment. Automation systems have been developed to improve these issues. In the process of automation, images are processed and sent to the remote brain for processing and decision making. It is noted that the image is written for compaction to reduce processing and computational costs. Images require large storage and transmission resources to perform their operations. A good strategy for pictures compression can help minimize these requirements. The question of compressing data on accuracy is always a challenge. Therefore, to optimize imaging, it is necessary to reduce inconsistencies in medical imaging. So this document introduces a new image compression scheme called the GenPSOWVQ method that uses a recurrent neural network with wavelet VQ. The codebook is built using a combination of fragments and genetic algorithms. The newly developed image compression model attains precise compression while maintaining image accuracy with lower computational costs when encoding clinical images. The proposed method was tested using real-time medical imaging using PSNR, MSE, SSIM, NMSE, SNR, and CR indicators. Experimental results show that the proposed GenPSOWVQ method yields higher PSNR SSIMM values for a given compression ratio than the existing methods. In addition, the proposed GenPSOWVQ method yields lower values of MSE, RMSE, and SNR for a given compression ratio than the existing methods.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35256896 PMCID: PMC8898112 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2354866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Experimental images.
Analysis of PSNR, MSE, SSIM, NMSE, and SNR of GenPSOWVQ approach along with 25% CR ratio.
| Dataset | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compression approaches | |||||
| Metrics | OFFNN | VQFFNN | VQOFFNN | IntOPMICM | GenPSOWVQ |
| PSNR | 36.80 | 48.12 | 49.65 | 52.4227 | 60.64 |
| SSIM | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.6736 | 0.86 |
| MSE | 13.57 | 8.86 | 6.19 | 1.4164 | 0.83 |
| RMSE | 3.68 | 0.001 | 2.48 | 1.1901 | 0.0099 |
| SNR | 21.42 | 16.96 | 10.65 | 7.42 | 5.63 |
Figure 2Analysis of PSNR, MSE, SSIM, NMSE, and SNR of GenPSOWVQ approach along with 25% CR ratio.
Figure 3Analysis performance of best chromosome particles.
Figure 4Analysis performance of best chromosome particles with 100 iterations.
Figure 5Analysis performance of best chromosome particles with population size of 50.