BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia is not uncommon among pulmonary hypertension (PH) population, and may be associated with disease severity. HYPOTHESIS: To investigate different spectrums and prevalence of arrhythmias in different clinical PH groups in Chinese population. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PH between April 15, 2019, and August 2, 2021, were enrolled prospectively. The prevalence of different types of arrhythmias in PH patients were calculated. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine independent predictors for arrhythmia. RESULTS: One thousand patients were enrolled. The prevalence of any arrhythmia, sinus node dysfunction, sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, other types of atrial tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and ventricular tachycardia is 44.4%, 12.2%, 15.2%, 8.1%, 4.1%, 10.2%, 7.1%, and 2.5%. Logistic regression analyses revealed that older age and larger right ventricle (odds ratio: 1.111 and 1.095, p < .05) were independently related with higher probability of supraventricular arrhythmia; Complicating with coronary artery disease, larger right ventricle, and increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (odds ratio: 19.540, 1.106, and 1.085, p < .05) were independently correlated with sinus node dysfunction/atrioventricular block in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of PH patients experienced at least one type of arrhythmia. The most common seen arrhythmias were supraventricular arrhythmia, sinus tachycardia, and sinus node dysfunction. Older age and larger right ventricle were independently related with higher probability of supraventricular arrhythmia; Complicating with coronary artery disease, larger right ventricle and increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter were independently correlated with higher probability of sinus node dysfunction/atrioventricular block in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia is not uncommon among pulmonary hypertension (PH) population, and may be associated with disease severity. HYPOTHESIS: To investigate different spectrums and prevalence of arrhythmias in different clinical PH groups in Chinese population. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PH between April 15, 2019, and August 2, 2021, were enrolled prospectively. The prevalence of different types of arrhythmias in PH patients were calculated. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine independent predictors for arrhythmia. RESULTS: One thousand patients were enrolled. The prevalence of any arrhythmia, sinus node dysfunction, sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, other types of atrial tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and ventricular tachycardia is 44.4%, 12.2%, 15.2%, 8.1%, 4.1%, 10.2%, 7.1%, and 2.5%. Logistic regression analyses revealed that older age and larger right ventricle (odds ratio: 1.111 and 1.095, p < .05) were independently related with higher probability of supraventricular arrhythmia; Complicating with coronary artery disease, larger right ventricle, and increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (odds ratio: 19.540, 1.106, and 1.085, p < .05) were independently correlated with sinus node dysfunction/atrioventricular block in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of PH patients experienced at least one type of arrhythmia. The most common seen arrhythmias were supraventricular arrhythmia, sinus tachycardia, and sinus node dysfunction. Older age and larger right ventricle were independently related with higher probability of supraventricular arrhythmia; Complicating with coronary artery disease, larger right ventricle and increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter were independently correlated with higher probability of sinus node dysfunction/atrioventricular block in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Authors: Maria J Ruiz-Cano; Ana Gonzalez-Mansilla; Pilar Escribano; Juan Delgado; Fernando Arribas; Juan Torres; Angela Flox; Marta Riva; Miguel A Gomez; Carlos Saenz Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Raymond L Benza; Dave P Miller; Robyn J Barst; David B Badesch; Adaani E Frost; Michael D McGoon Journal: Chest Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Micah R Fisher; Paul R Forfia; Elzbieta Chamera; Traci Housten-Harris; Hunter C Champion; Reda E Girgis; Mary C Corretti; Paul M Hassoun Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sabine Ernst; Konstantinos Dimopoulos; Maria Drakopoulou; Heba Nashat; Aleksander Kempny; Rafael Alonso-Gonzalez; Lorna Swan; Stephen J Wort; Laura C Price; Colm McCabe; Tom Wong; Michael A Gatzoulis Journal: Heart Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Zdenka Fingrova; David Ambroz; Pavel Jansa; Jan Kuchar; Jaroslav Lindner; Jan Kunstyr; Michael Aschermann; Ales Linhart; Stepan Havranek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240