| Literature DB >> 35252839 |
Bing Wang1, Xingang Zhao1, Boyan Zhang1, Yimeng Cui1, Muzaipaier Nueraihemaiti1, Qifang Kou2, Hailing Luo1.
Abstract
Two untargeted metabolomics approaches based on gas chromatography mass spectrometry and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry were used to identify the effects of different feeding regimes (concentrate, corn silage, alfalfa silage, mulberry leaf silage) on the potential meat flavor and taste components of Tan-lamb. Among 31 identified volatiles, hexanal was affected by the alfalfa silage diet, and 3-hydroxydodecanoic acid was changed by the mulberry leaf silage diet. l-Pipecolic acid (area under the curve = 1, fold change = 0.18-0.48) and trimethylamine N-oxide (area under the curve = 1, fold change = 5.26-22.84) was the potential best discriminant biomarker under alfalfa silage and concentrate feeding, respectively. The hydrophilic components were more readily changed by feeding regimes than volatile flavor compounds. Our findings are helpful for the illustration of Tan-lamb meat chemistry and producing high-quality lamb meat with improved flavor and taste by corn silage, alfalfa silage, or mulberry leaf silage.Entities:
Keywords: AS, alfalfa silage-based diet; AUC, area under the curve; CON, concentrate-based diet; CS, corn silage-based diet; DFMs, differential metabolites; DVCs, differential volatile metabolites; ESI, electrospray ionization; FC, fold change; Foodomics; GC-MS, gas chromatograph-mass spectrograph; IDA, information dependent acquisition; IMF, intramuscular fat; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; MS, mulberry leaf silage-based diet; OPLS-DA, orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis; PCA, principal component analysis; PLS-DA, partial least squares discriminant analysis; QC, quality control; RI, retention index; SPME, solid-phase microextraction; TMAO, Trimethylamine N-oxide; Tan lamb meat; UHPLC-QTOF-MS; UHPLC-QTOF-MS, ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry; VIP, variable importance in the projection; Volatiles; Water-soluble flavor precursors
Year: 2022 PMID: 35252839 PMCID: PMC8892073 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem X ISSN: 2590-1575
Effect of different feed regimes on meat nutritional composition in raw lambs.
| Items, dry matter basis | Treatments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | CS | AS | MS | SEM | ||
| Crude protein, % | 81.4 | 81.0 | 82.1 | 82.4 | 1.206 | 0.85 |
| IMF | 11.0 | 9.85 | 7.41 | 6.95 | 1.154 | 0.08 |
| Ash, % | 4.72ab | 4.52b | 4.75ab | 5.04a | 0.116 | 0.06 |
a-bMeans within a row with different subscripts differ when p-value < 0.05.
2CON, concentrate diet; CS, corn silage; AS, alfalfa silage; MS, mulberry leaf silage.
IMF = intramuscular fat.
Fig. 1Effect of different feed regimes on volatile compounds of raw lamb based on GC–MS. Principal component analysis (PCA) score plots of the individual metabolites from the four groups with the quality control (a). Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) score plots of volatile compounds from every two groups’ comparisons (b-g). CON, concentrate diet; CS, corn silage; AS, alfalfa silage; MS, mulberry leaf silage.
Fig. 2The detected volatile compounds profiles of raw lamb muscle of Tan-lamb among the four groups (n = 6). Heatmap of the detected volatile compounds profiles from the four groups (a). Percentages of volatile categories identified in raw lamb (b). Heatmap of the significantly correlated volatile compounds (p-value < 0.01, c). CON, concentrate diet; CS, corn silage; AS, alfalfa silage; MS, mulberry leaf silage.
Effect of different feed regimes on differential volatile compounds of raw lamb based on GC–MS.
| Item | Formula | Class | Retention Time | Relative abundance, μg/kg meat | log2FC | FDR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS-CON | CS | CON | ||||||
| 2′-Hexyl-1,1′-bicyclopropane-2-octanoic acid methyl ester | C21H38O2 | Esters | 20.98 | 0.87 | 3.82 | −2.14 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
| 14-Octadecenal | C18H34O | Aldehydes | 25.75 | 5.34 | 0.87 | 2.61 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
| Dodecane | C12H26 | Alkanes | 9.2 | 27.30 | 19.18 | 0.51 | 0.02 | 0.15 |
| AS-CON | AS | CON | ||||||
| Hexanal | C6H12O | Aldehydes | 6.31 | 8.91 | 165.51 | −4.22 | 0.05 | 0.73 |
| MS-CON | MS | CON | ||||||
| 3-Hydroxydodecanoic acid | C12H24O3 | Alcohols | 20.97 | 8.26 | 3.48 | 1.25 | 0.03 | 0.75 |
| MS-CS | MS | CS | ||||||
| 10,13-Octadecadiynoic acid, methyl ester | C19H30O2 | Esters | 20.03 | 0.66 | 6.61 | −3.32 | 0.02 | 0.47 |
| MS-AS | MS | AS | ||||||
| Octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether | C28H58O9 | Esters | 25.39 | 24.38 | 0.39 | 5.95 | 0.02 | 0.72 |
CON, concentrate diet; CS, corn silage; AS, alfalfa silage; MS, mulberry leaf silage; FC, fold change; FDR, false discovery rate.
Fig. 3Venn diagram illustrating overlap of the four group-associated differential metabolites (DFMs) (e.g., CS-associated DFMs means the mutual DFMs between CS and other three groups) based on LC-MS in the raw lamb. CON-associated DFMs (a); CS-associated DFMs (b); AS-associated DFMs (c); MS-associated DFMs. CON, concentrate diet; CS, corn silage; AS, alfalfa silage; MS, mulberry leaf silage.
Overlap of the diet-associated potential biomarkers in discriminating it from others (e.g., AS associated biomarkers mean the mutual biomarkers between CS and other at least two groups) based on LC-MS in the raw lamb meat.
| Item | Comparisons | No. | Discriminant compounds |
|---|---|---|---|
| CON associated biomarkers | CON-AS, CON-MS | 2 | Trimethylamine |
| AS associated biomarkers | AS-CON, AS-CS, AS-MS | 2 | |
| AS-CS, AS-MS | 1 | Salicyluric acid | |
| MS associated biomarkers | MS-CON, MS-CS | 1 | Pro-Arg |
| MS-AS, MS-CON | 2 | ||
| MS-AS, MS-CS | 1 | Propyl cinnamate |
CON, concentrate diet; CS, corn silage; AS, alfalfa silage; MS, mulberry leaf silage.