| Literature DB >> 35252760 |
Ujjal Kumar Sur1, Chittaranjan Santra2.
Abstract
The deadly novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for COVID-19, which was first recognized in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Rapid identification at primary stage of the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, is important to restrict it and prevent the pandemic. Real-time RT-PCR assays are the best diagnostic tests presently available for SARS-CoV-2 detection, which are highly sensitive, even though expensive equipment and trained technicians are necessary. Furthermore, the method has moderately long time bound. This deadly viral infection can also be detected by applying various spectroscopic techniques as spectroscopy can provide fast, precise identification and monitoring, leading to the overall understanding of its mutation rates, which will further facilitate antiviral drug development as well as vaccine development. It is an innovative and non-invasive technique for combating the spread of novel coronavirus. This review article demonstrates the application of various spectroscopic techniques to detect COVID-19 rapidly. Different spectroscopy-based detection protocols and additional development of new, novel sensors and biosensors along with diagnostic kits had been described here stressing the status of sensitive diagnostic systems to handle with the COVID-19 outbreak. Graphical abstract: Spectroscopy: A versatile sensing tool for cost-effective and rapid detection of novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). © Qatar University and Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Diagnostics; RT-PCR; Raman spectroscopy; Spectroscopy; Surface-enhanced Raman scattering; Vibrational spectroscopy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35252760 PMCID: PMC8883019 DOI: 10.1007/s42247-022-00358-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emergent Mater ISSN: 2522-5731
Fig. 1TEM image (Reprinted with permission from Goldsmith et al. [3], Copyright (2004) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA) and schematic picture of COVID-19 virus
The various detection kits used for detection of COVID-19 along with advantages and drawbacks
| Diagnostic test | Developer | Advantage | Drawback |
|---|---|---|---|
Real time reverse transcriptase PCR assays | University of Hong Kong | High sensitivity and specificity | Not useful for detection COVID-19 cases with high viral loads |
| Coronavirus gene detection kit | Amoy Diagnostics (Xiamen, China) | 99.8% accuracy with limit of detection 500 copies/mL | Low sensitivity |
| Nucleic acid assay | Chinese national institute for viral disease control and prevention | Comparable sensitivity and specificity to commercial qRT-PCR kits in terms of operation and turnaround time | Moderate sensitivity |
| Real-time PCR assay | Altona Diagnostics (Hamburg, Germany) | Comparable with various real-time PCR platforms | For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures |
Real-time fluorescent RT-PCR kit | BGI Group (Beijing) | Highly sensitive with limit of detection 100 copies/mL. Highly specific with no cross-reactivity with 54 human respiratory pathogens. High throughput | Stored at a temperature below − 20 °C |
| Nucleic acid detection kit | BGI Group | High sensitivity, wide linear range | Did not cross-react with other circulating coronaviruses |
| COVID-19 Go-Strips | Biomeme | Portable on-site testing with high sensitivity | For in vitro diagnostic use only |
| TaqMan 2019-nCoV Assay Kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | High-throughput, low cost, high-sensitive commercial diagnostic kit | Stored at a temperature below − 20 °C |
| DiAGSure Ncov-19 detection assay | GCC Biotech limited, Kolkata, India | Low-priced COVID-19 testing kit with nearly 100% accuracy in a short span of 90 min | It cannot provide information on other diseases or infection |
| Feluda CRISPR test kit | IGIB, New Delhi, India | The test kit had 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity | The virus may only be detectable in sputum or nasopharyngeal swab but not necessarily at both locations at the same time |
| Real-time COVID-19 breath test analyzer | Breathonix, Singapore | Real-time COVID-19 breath test analyzer to detect COVID-19 within 60 s with 90% accuracy and 93% sensitivity | Not useful for detection COVID-19 cases with low viral loads |
Fig. 2The schematic diagram exhibiting sequential FT-IR-based assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, which consisted of sample collection, RNA extraction, FTIR analysis, and subsequent machine learning. (Reprinted with permission from Kitane et al. [26]. Copyright (2021) Nature Portfolio)
Fig. 3The SERS spectra of (a) the N protein, (b) the S protein, and (c) the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virion particles. (Reprinted with permission from Sanchez et al. [27]. Copyright (2021) Royal Society of Chemistry)
Fig. 4The theoretical DFT simulation of portions of the Raman spectra of components of the protein N. (Reprinted with permission from Sanchez et al. [27]. Copyright (2021) Royal Society of Chemistry)
Fig. 5The SERS spectra of ACE2 proteins and 23 tested water samples by the SERS assay (mean value) using a portable Raman spectrometer. (Reprinted with permission from Zhang et al. [28]. Copyright (2021) Elsevier Inc.)