| Literature DB >> 35251587 |
Engy Ahmed Hamed1, May Fathy Abdelaty1, Hend Karam Sorour1, Dalia M A Elmasry2, Marwa Ali Abdelmagid1, Mohammed Ahmed Maher Saleh1, Mona Aly Abdelhalim AbdelRahman1.
Abstract
Multidrug resistance poses a global threat to the poultry industry and public health, so the direction towards eliminating the use of antibiotics and finding alternatives is a vital step to solve this problem. Thyme microemulsion (10% oil/water) had nanodrop size 28.65 ± 0.89 nm, with a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.28 with greater homogeneity. It showed IC50 > 100 ug/ml on cytotoxicity assay and 14 active components by GC-Mass. The study was carried out using 210 Cobb chicks divided into fourteen groups. The infected groups were challenged using two Salmonella Enteritidis multidrug resistance (MDR) and Salmonella Enteritidis sensitive strains to the sulpha-trimethoprim antibiotic. The challenged inoculum was 1 × 109 CFU of Salmonella Enteritidis by oral route. The MIC treatments doses were 1 ml/liter water for thyme oil and thyme microemulsion and 33.34 mg/kg b.wt sulfadiazine for 5 days. The results showed that both thymol oil (0.1%) and microemulsion (0.01%) are able to decrease the count of Salmonella Enteritidis in cecal content and fecal dropping and the mortality rates after five days of treatment. In addition, thyme oil and microemulsion had no pathological alteration on chickens' tissues that were collected two weeks after giving the treatment. By the robust HPLC method, the SDZ and TMP residues in tissues of infected groups treated with Cotrimazine® + thyme oil microemulsion had a slight significant economic impact (P < 0.05) compared to Cotrimazine® alone. In conclusion, thymol oil and microemulsion could be an alternative economic choice for multidrug resistance Salmonella Enteritidis treatment in poultry farms.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35251587 PMCID: PMC8894032 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3647523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Identification of groups of chicken in the in vivo challenge.
| GP1 | Inoculated with |
| GP2 | Inoculated with |
| GP3 | Strain 1 + sulpha-trimethoprim antibiotic |
| GP4 | Strain 2 + sulpha-trimethoprim antibiotic |
| GP5 | Strain 1 + sulpha-trimethoprim antibiotic + microemulsion |
| GP6 | Strain 2 + sulpha-trimethoprim antibiotic + microemulsion |
| GP7 | Only thymol oil |
| GP8 | Strain 1 + thymol oil |
| GP9 | Strain 2 + thymol oil |
| GP10 | Only microemulsion |
| GP11 | Strain 1 + microemulsion |
| GP12 | Strain 2 + microemulsion |
| GP13 | Negative control |
| GP14 | Only antibiotic |
Reagents, equipment, and chromatographic conditions for detection of the antibiotic residues.
| Injection volume | 100 |
| Flow rate | 1 mL/min |
| Mobile phase | Acetonitrile: 10 mM phosphoric acid (16:84 v/v) |
| Column temp | Ambient temperature |
| UV | 271 nm |
| Injection volume | 100 |
Figure 1(a) TEM of thymol microemulsion. (b): Cell viability % of thymol microemulsion effect on Vero cells.
Total number and percentage of mortality rates in each group.
| Groups | Number of dead chicken in each group | Percentage of mortality rates |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 6 | 40 |
| Group 2 | 4 | 26.70 |
| Group 3 | 3 | 20 |
| Group 4 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 5 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 6 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 7 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 8 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 9 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 10 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 11 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 12 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 13 | 1 | 6.70 |
| Group 14 | 1 | 6.70 |
(n = 15) total mean of chicken in each group.
Results of effect of total Salmonella Enteritidis count in in vivo challenge.
| Groups | Count of | Count of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd week PI (postinoculation) (age of chicken 35 days) | 4th week PI (postinoculation) (age of chicken 49 days) | 3rd week PI (postinoculation) (age of chicken 42 days) | 4th week PI (postinoculation) (age of chicken 49 days) | |
| GP1 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 |
| GP2 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 |
| GP3 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 |
| GP4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GP5 | 10 × 102 | Less than 1 × 101 | 19 × 102 | 5 × 102 |
| GP6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GP8 | Over 300 × 102 | 18 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | 20 × 102 |
| GP9 | Over 300 × 102 | 10 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | 25 × 102 |
| GP11 | 12 × 102 | 8 × 102 | Over 300 × 102 | 15 × 102 |
| GP12 | 0 | 0 | 8× 102 | 0 |
Statistical analysis of total Salmonella Enteritidis count in groups challenged with MDR (log of mean ± SD).
| Group | 2nd week PI | 4th week PI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.48 ± 0 | 4.48 ± 0 |
| 3 | 4.48 ± 0 | 4.48 ± 0 |
| 5 | 1.67 ± 1.52 | 0 |
| 8 | 4.48 ± 0 | 2.03 ± 1.77 |
| 11 | 1.73 ± 1.53 | 1.03 ± 1.77 |
There is a highly significant difference between groups having at the same column at P value ≤ 0.05.
Statistical analysis of total Salmonella Enteritidis total count in groups challenged with SXT (log of mean ± SD).
| Group | 2nd week PI | 4th week PI |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4.48 ± 0 | 4.48 ± 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 4.22 ± 0.44 | 1 ± 1.73 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 |
There is a highly significant difference between groups having at the same column at P value ≤ 0.05.
Results of sulfadiazine concentrations (μg/gm) in different boiler tissues after administration of 33.34 mg/kg b.wt. for 5 days.
| Tissue | Groups | 1st day | 2nd day | 3rd day | 4th day | 5th day | MRL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muscle | Antibiotic in normal healthy group | 110 ± 9 | 47.3 ± 3.1 | ND | ND | ND | 100 |
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group | 86 ± 6 | 31 ± 3 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group | 88 ± 6 | 33 ± 3 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 84 ± 5 | 29 ± 2 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 83 ± 6 | 27 ± 2 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Liver | Antibiotic in normal healthy group | 196 ± 8 | 119 ± 10 | 86 ± 7 | 63 ± 10 | 36 ± 5 | |
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group | 142 ± 11 | 99 ± 7 | 72 ± 4 | 45 ± 4 | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group | 144 ± 10 | 100 ± 8 | 72 ± 3 | 47 ± 3 | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 139 ± 11 | 97 ± 6 | 67 ± 2 | 43 ± 4 | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group fed on thyme oil microemulsion | 134 ± 9 | 94 ± 6 | 66 ± 3 | 40 ± 2 | ND | ||
| Kidney | Antibiotic in normal healthy group | 515 ± 53 | 342 ± 26 | 294 ± 13 | 128 ± 11 | 66 ± 6 | |
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group | 391 ± 10 | 195 ± 14 | 110 ± 11 | 78 ± 4 | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group | 395 ± 16 | 193 ± 14 | 112 ± 6 | 81 ± 6 | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 387 ± 13 | 188 ± 6 | 104 ± 12 | 74 ± 5 | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 386 ± 19 | 187 ± 12 | 103 ± 10 | 75 ± 4 | ND |
ND: not detected. Significant with normal healthy group given antibiotic only at the same column using ANOVA at P ≤ 0.05.
Results of trimethoprim concentrations (μg/gm) in different boiler tissues after administration of 6.67 mg/kg b.wt. for 5 days.
| Tissue | Groups | 1st day | 2nd day | 3rd day | 4th day | 5th day | MRL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muscle | Antibiotic in normal healthy group | 41 ± 4 | 18 ± 1 | ND | ND | ND | 50 |
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group | 26 ± 2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group | 26 ± 1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 26 ± 3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 25 ± 1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Liver | Antibiotic in normal healthy group | 68.6 ± 3 | 42 ± 4 | 30 ± 3 | 22 ± 4 | ND | |
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group | 50 ± 5 | 28 ± 1 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group | 52 ± 2 | 28 ± 1 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 50 ± 7 | 27 ± 3 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 51 ± 4 | 27 ± 3 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Kidney | Antibiotic in normal healthy group | 346 ± 35 | 230 ± 19 | 195 ± 11 | 86 ± 6 | 44 ± 4 | |
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group | 219 ± 9 | 134 ± 9 | 87 ± 3 | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group | 219 ± 9 | 132 ± 10 | 88 ± 4 | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + MDR infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 217 ± 6 | 134 ± 10 | 88 ± 3 | ND | ND | ||
| Antibiotic + SS infected group fed on thyme microemulsion | 380 ± 19 | 187 ± 12 | 90 ± 3 | ND | ND |
ND: not detected. Significant with normal healthy group given antibiotic only at the same column using ANOVA at P ≤ 0.05.
Pathological lesions in groups infected with MDR strain 2 weeks after inoculation.
| Organ | Lesion | Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR1 | GR3 | GR5 | GR8 | GR11 | ||
| Heart | Edema | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | +++ |
| Hemorrhage | +++ | ++ | +++ | — | +++ | |
| Necrosis | ++ | ++ | + | — | + | |
| Heterophilic infiltration | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | ++ | |
| Pericarditis | + | + | — | — | — | |
|
| ||||||
| Liver | Heterophilic infiltration | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | ++ |
| Congestion of blood vessels and sinusoids | ++ | ++ | +++ | + | +++ | |
| Hepatocytic degeneration | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | |
| Necrosis | + | ++ | — | — | — | |
|
| ||||||
| Spleen | Lymphocytic depletion | + | + | ++ | + | ++ |
| Vasculitis | + | ++ | +++ | + | +++ | |
| 2ry follicle | + | + | — | — | + | |
| Necrosis | — | + | — | — | — | |
|
| ||||||
| Proventriculus | Heterophilic infiltration | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
| Mucosal degeneration | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | ++ | |
| Necrosis | ++ | ++ | ++ | — | ++ | |
|
| ||||||
| Cecum | Thickening wall | +++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ |
| Heterophilic infiltration | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | |
| Necrosis | ++ | — | + | — | + | |
(+ = mild, ++ = moderate, +++ = severe).
Pathological lesions in groups treated with SXT strain 2 weeks after inoculation.
| Organ | Lesion | Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR2 | GR4 | GR6 | GR9 | GR12 | ||
| Heart | Edema | +++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ |
| Hemorrhage | +++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | |
| Necrosis | ++ | — | — | — | ++ | |
| Heterophilic infiltration | ++ | + | + | + | ++ | |
| Pericarditis | + | — | ++ | — | — | |
|
| ||||||
| Liver | Heterophilic infiltration | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
| Congestion of blood vessels and sinusoids | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | |
| Hepatocytic degeneration | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | |
| Necrosis | + | ++ | ++ | + | +++ | |
|
| ||||||
| Spleen | Lymphocytic depletion | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | + |
| Vasculitis | ++ | +++ | +++ | + | + | |
| 2ry follicle | + | — | +++ | + | + | |
| Necrosis | ++ | +++ | — | — | — | |
|
| ||||||
| Proventriculus | Heterophilic infiltration | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | ++ |
| Mucosal degeneration | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | +++ | |
| Necrosis | ++ | ++ | +++ | — | + | |
|
| ||||||
| Cecum | Thickening wall | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
| Heterophilic infiltration | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | |
| Necrosis | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | |
(+ = mild, ++ = moderate, +++ = severe).
Figure 2Microscopic picture of infected groups with MDR Salmonella Enteritidis strain.
Figure 3Microscopic picture of infected groups with SXT Salmonella Enteritidis sensitive strain.