| Literature DB >> 35250776 |
Bo Pu1,2, Siyu Ji2, Wenyuan Sang2, Zhiwei Tang1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of entrepreneurial leadership on entrepreneurial performance in start-ups. Specifically, a moderated serial mediation model was developed to investigate the mediating role of tacit knowledge sharing and job embeddedness and the moderating effect of career growth opportunities. Data was collected from 376 start-up employees via an online survey platform. Using hierarchical multiple regression and Hayes' PROCESS Macro by SPSS 21.0, and structural equation modeling by AMOS 23.0, support was found for both mediation and moderation effects. Results showed that entrepreneurial leadership significantly positively affects entrepreneurial performance by mediating with tacit knowledge sharing and job embeddedness. Moreover, career growth opportunities moderate the serial mediating effect of tacit knowledge sharing and job embeddedness between entrepreneurial leadership and entrepreneurial performance. This study provides theoretical guidance for entrepreneurial leadership to improve entrepreneurial performance.Entities:
Keywords: career growth opportunities; entrepreneurial leadership; entrepreneurial performance; job embeddedness; tacit knowledge sharing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35250776 PMCID: PMC8895199 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Conceptual model.
Confirmatory factor analysis results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single-factor | EL+TKS+CGO+JE + EP | 922.848 | 170 | 5.429 | 0.768 | 0.713 | 0.790 | 0.109 | 0.765 |
| Two-factor | EL, TKS+CGO + JE + EP | 701.282 | 169 | 4.150 | 0.818 | 0.774 | 0.851 | 0.092 | 0.833 |
| Three-factor | EL, TKS+CGO + JE, EP | 555.931 | 167 | 3.329 | 0.850 | 0.811 | 0.891 | 0.079 | 0.876 |
| Four-factor | EL, TKS+CGO, JE, EP | 381.991 | 164 | 2.329 | 0.904 | 0.877 | 0.939 | 0.060 | 0.930 |
| Five-factor | EL, TKS, JE, EP, CGO | 281.076 | 160 | 1.757 | 0.931 | 0.909 | 0.966 | 0.025 | 0.960 |
n = 376.
Correlation and descriptive statistics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||||||||
| Age | −0.025 | |||||||||
| Monthly salary | −0.191 | 0.297 | ||||||||
| Number of employee | −0.032 | 0.195 | 0.238 | |||||||
| Corporate tenure | 0.000 | 0.398 | 0.309 | 0.347 | ||||||
| EL | −0.021 | 0.092 | 0.195 | 0.159 | 0.237 | |||||
| TKS | 0.088 | 0.031 | 0.125 | 0.184 | 0.232 | 0.541 | ||||
| JE | −0.070 | 0.211 | 0.288 | 0.210 | 0.380 | 0.569 | 0.496 | |||
| EP | 0.003 | 0.103 | 0.165 | 0.285 | 0.333 | 0.606 | 0.472 | 0.543 | ||
| CGO | −0.035 | 0.089 | 0.303 | 0.292 | 0.330 | 0.587 | 0.585 | 0.603 | 0.551 | |
| Mean | 0.638 | 2.282 | 2.965 | 2.763 | 2.713 | 5.271 | 5.316 | 4.812 | 4.699 | 5.179 |
| Standard deviation | 0.481 | 1.033 | 1.005 | 0.903 | 1.008 | 0.696 | 1.124 | 1.124 | 1.101 | 1.146 |
| AVE | 0.576 | 0.559 | 0.526 | 0.495 | 0.577 | |||||
| CR | 0.871 | 0.791 | 0.847 | 0.796 | 0.803 |
Gender: 0 = male, 1 = female; Age: 1 = 22–25 years old, 2 = 26–30 years old, 3 = 31–35 years old, 4 = 36–40 years old, 5 = 41 years old and above; Monthly salary: 1 = ¥3,000 and below, 2 = ¥3,001–¥5,000, 3 = ¥5,001–¥8,000, 4 = ¥8,001–¥15,000, 5 = above ¥15,000; Number of staff: 1 = below 10 persons, 2 = 10-50 persons, 3 = 50–100 persons, 4 = above 100 persons; Corporate Tenure: 1 = below 1 year, 2 = 1–2 years, 3 = 2–3 years, 4 = 3–5 years; n = 376;
p < 0.05 (two-tailed),
p < 0.01 (two-tailed),
p < 0.001 (two-tailed).
Hypothesis test results.
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| Gender | 0.240 | 0.202 | −0.089 | −0.149 | −0.128 | 0.034 | 0.028 | −0.007 |
| Age | −0.083 | −0.044 | 0.053 | 0.074 | 0.094 | −0.042 | −0.045 | −0.033 |
| Monthly salary | 0.017 | −0.064 | 0.113 | 0.109 | 0.061 | −0.018 | −0.044 | −0.081 |
| Number of employees | 0.099 | 0.045 | 0.032 | 0.008 | −0.034 | 0.183 | 0.165 | 0.169 |
| Corporate tenure | 0.122 | 0.051 | 0.227 | 0.197 | 0.160 | 0.188 | 0.126 | 0.112 |
|
| ||||||||
| EL | 0.821 | −0.089 | 0.794 | 0.591 | 0.458 | 0.866 | 0.609 | −0.229 |
|
| ||||||||
| TKS | 0.247 | 0.146 | 0.106 | 0.046 | ||||
| JE | 0.214 | 0.177 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| CGO | −0.195 | 0.315 | −0.665 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| EL × CGO | 0.117 | −0.005 | 0.160 | |||||
|
| 0.324 | 0.427 | 0.405 | 0.446 | 0.489 | 0.425 | 0.469 | 0.495 |
| 29.484 | 34.167 | 41.854 | 42.366 | 38.929 | 45.496 | 40.591 | 35.771 | |
| Δ | 0.324 | 0.103 | 0.405 | 0.041 | 0.043 | 0.425 | 0.044 | 0.026 |
|
| 29.484 | 32.917 | 41.854 | 27.443 | 15.342 | 45.496 | 15.299 | 9.219 |
n = 376;
p < 0.001,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.05.
Figure 2Main effects. n = 376; ***p < 0.001.
Mediating effect.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total effect | 0.866 | 0.065 | (0.739, 0.994) | |
| Direct effect | 0.609 | 0.079 | (0.455, 0.764) | 70.323% |
| Indirect effect | 0.257 | 0.058 | (0.144, 0.372) | 29.677% |
b, unstandardized regression coefficients; SE, standard errors; CI, confidence intervals.
Figure 3Analysis of moderating effect.
Conditional process analysis.
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| TKS and JE | EL → TKS → JE → EP | Low | 0.025 | 0.011 | (0.007, 0.049) |
| Middle | 0.034 | 0.012 | (0.014, 0.060) | ||
| High | 0.043 | 0.016 | (0.017, 0.079) | ||
| TKS | EL → TKS → EP | Low | 0.050 | 0.026 | (0.004, 0.104) |
| Middle | 0.069 | 0.031 | (0.008, 0.131) | ||
| High | 0.087 | 0.040 | (0.010, 0.168) | ||
| JE | EL → JE → EP | None | 0.172 | 0.046 | (0.088, 0.269) |
b, unstandardized regression coefficients; SE, standard errors; CI, confidence intervals.