| Literature DB >> 35250414 |
V S Uma1, Zeba Usmani2, Minaxi Sharma2, Deepti Diwan3, Monika Sharma4, Miao Guo5, Maria G Tuohy6, Charalampos Makatsoris5, Xiaobin Zhao7, Vijay Kumar Thakur8,9, Vijai Kumar Gupta8,10.
Abstract
Algal biomass is a promising feedstock for sustainable production of a range of value-added compounds and products including food, feed, fuel. To further augment the commercial value of algal metabolites, efficient valorization methods and biorefining channels are essential. Algal extracts are ideal sources of biotechnologically viable compounds loaded with anti-microbial, anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancerous and several therapeutic and restorative properties. Emerging technologies in biomass valorisation tend to reduce the significant cost burden in large scale operations precisely associated with the pre-treatment, downstream processing and waste management processes. In order to enhance the economic feasibility of algal products in the global market, comprehensive extraction of multi-algal product biorefinery is envisaged as an assuring strategy. Algal biorefinery has inspired the technologists with novel prospectives especially in waste recovery, carbon concentration/sequestration and complete utilisation of the value-added products in a sustainable closed-loop methodology. This review critically examines the latest trends in the algal biomass valorisation and the expansive feedstock potentials in a biorefinery perspective. The recent scope dynamics of algal biomass utilisation such as bio-surfactants, oleochemicals, bio-stimulants and carbon mitigation have also been discussed. The existing challenges in algal biomass valorisation, current knowledge gaps and bottlenecks towards commercialisation of algal technologies are discussed. This review is a comprehensive presentation of the road map of algal biomass valorisation techniques towards biorefinery technology. The global market view of the algal products, future research directions and emerging opportunities are reviewed. © Crown 2022.Entities:
Keywords: Algal biomass; Algal biomass valorisation; Algal metabolites; Biorefinery; Circular bioeconomy; Value added products
Year: 2022 PMID: 35250414 PMCID: PMC8889523 DOI: 10.1007/s11101-022-09805-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phytochem Rev ISSN: 1568-7767 Impact factor: 5.374
Fig. 1Feedstock potentials of algal metabolites and its biotechnological applications
Fig. 2Biomass valorisation and its plausible biorefinery channels
Variable lipid content of algal genera and its biotechnological applications
| No. | Name of the algae | Total Lipid yield (dry wt) | Biotechnological application | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Up to 83% | Biofuels and bioremediation | Hena et al. ( |
| 2 |
| Up to 80% | Dietary lipids and biofuels | Sajjadi et al. ( |
| 3 |
| Up to 75% | Hydrocarbons | Kleinart and Griehl ( |
| 4 |
| 50–77% | Biofuels and supplements | Schlagermannet et al. ( |
| 5 |
| 25–75% | Biofuels | Schlagermannet et al. ( |
| 6 |
| 36–68% | Biofuels and aquafeeds | Schlagermannet et al. ( |
| 7 |
| 45% | CO2 mitigation, commercial production of pigments and lipids | Thawechai et al. ( |
| 8 | 45–50% | Biofuels | Schlagermannet et al. ( | |
| 9 |
| 35–45% | CO2 bio-fixation and biodiesel | Razzak ( |
| 10 |
| 35–74% | Biodiesel | Schlagermannet et al. ( |
| 11 |
| 55% | Biofuels and aquafeeds | Sajjadi et al. ( |
| 12 |
| 47% | Pharmaceutical and aquaculture applications | Gharajeh et al. ( |
| 13 |
| 10–40% | Biofuels | Milledge et al. ( |
| 14 |
| 35% (PUFA) | Therapeutics and dietary supplements | Aboal et al. ( |
| 15 |
| 31.5% | Liquid biofuels | Bogen et al. ( |
| 16 |
| 30% | Biofuels | Shokravi et al. ( |
| 17 |
| 24% | Biodiesel | Nirmala ( |
| 18 |
| Up to 20% | Biodiesel and biocalcification | Uma et al. ( |
| 19 |
| 19% | Biodiesel | Uma et al. ( |
| 20 |
| Up to 15% | Human Health foods and animal feeds | Moustafa and Batran ( |
Fig. 3Transesterification of algal biomass (in-situ). With Permission from Elsevier. Copyright© 2021. License Number: 5107730473664 (Karpagam et al. 2021)
Emerging trends in algal biomass valorisation and biorefinery potentials
| No. | Valorisation method | Organism | Target bio-product | Biorefinery approach | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anaerobic digestion (AD) | A 14% higher biomethane and waste recovery | I. Waste utilisation II. Substrate complementarity | Assemany et al. ( | |
| 2 | Anaerobic digestion | Enhanced biomethane recovery of 185 mL CH4/g VS at 150 °C | Hydrothermal carbonisation integrated AD | Brown et al. ( | |
| 3 | Anaerobic digestion | A significant 42% biocrude yield and 200 mL/gVS biomethane | Sequential hydro pyrolysis integrated AD | Choudhary et al. ( | |
| 4 | Constant magnetic field applied AD | Cyanoprocayota, Chlorophyta, and Bacillariophyceae | Biogas production 281.1 L of biogas/kg VS with a 41% Biomethane yield | Nil | Dębowski et al. ( |
| 5 | Hydrothermal treated AD | Microalgal consortia | Biochar and biomethane | Hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic digestion | Marin-Batista et al. ( |
| 6 | Anaerobic hybrid reactor |
| Enhanced energy (biomethane) recovery compared to the pre-treated biomass | Nil | Assemany et al. ( |
| 7 | Anaerobic digestion of residual algal cake |
| 48% enhanced methane yield from wet biodiesel extracted biomass | Biodiesel coupled biomethane generation | Kinnunen et al. ( |
| 8 | Anaerobic digestion | 49.87% and 22.26% enhanced biomethane and 10–12% lipid recovery | Biodiesel recovery defatted microalgae by AD | Srivastava et al. ( | |
| 9 | Anaerobic digestion of the lipid extraction biomass by super critical CO2 extraction |
| Enhanced lipid and methane yield— | Extraction of different biofuels from algal biomass | Hernández et al. ( |
| 10 | Biochemical extraction of lipids, proteins and pigments and AD of the residual biomass |
| Methane yield were consistent with residual and raw microalgal biomass (207–237 mL CH4/g volatile solids) | Value added metabolites and biogas production | Markou et al. ( |
| 11 | AD of de-oiled biomass and co-digestion with glycerol |
| Enhanced methane yield from 173.78 ± 9.57 to 438.46 ± 40.50mL of methane per gram of volatile solids using defatted biomass | Residual biomass used for enhanced biomethane recovery | Santos-Ballardo et al. ( |
| 12 | Fe2O3 nano catalyst aided transesterification |
| Enhanced biodiesel (81%) as compared to conventional methods (64%) | Post biodiesel recovery- defatted biomass used for dark-bio-hydrogen production and bio-ethanol by AD along with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (INVSC-1) | Banerjee et al. ( |
| 13 | Carbon sequestration and transesterification using a bubble column reaction |
| Obtained a biodiesel suitable FAME profile and sequestered 1.503 g of CO2 from air | Biodiesel and concomitant CO2 Sequestration | Banerjee et al. ( |
| 14 | Direct transesterification and acid hydrolysis |
| FAME yield—256 g/kg-biomass; coproduction of sugars, proteins and pigments | Zero waste biorefinery approach for biofuel and fine chemicals | Mandik et al. ( |
| 15 | Carbon capture aided transesterification |
| CO2 fixation rate—56.4 mg C/L/d; Lipid content—12.7% and bio calcite removal | Carbon sequestered biomass for biodiesel and bio-calcification | Dineshbabu et al. ( |
| 16 | Base catalysed transesterification coupled acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation with different pre-treatments |
| Biobutanol recovery—10.31% g/g cdw; Biodiesel yield—3.82% g/g cdw | Bio-butanol and biodiesel from algal biomass | Figueroa-Torres et al. ( |
| 17 | Enzyme catalysed direct transesterification followed by ethanol fermentation |
| Total FAME yield—92%; bioethanol—86% and glycerol recovery—93% | Algal feedstock for multiproduct recovery | Sivaramakrishnan and Incharoensakdi ( |
| 18 | Dark fermentation for biohydrogen production | Mixed microalgal consortia | Significant enhancement in biohydrogen yield | De-oiled algal biomass (DAB) for bio-hydrogen and recovery of volatile fatty acids | Subhash and Mohan ( |
| 19 | Algal fermentation of de-oiled algal biomass (DAB) with hybrid pre-treatment (PT) method |
| Higher sugar yield in hybrid PT—0.590 g/g DAB Biopolymer PHB—0.43 ± 0.20 g PHB/g DCW | Bioethanol and biopolymer production in a biorefinery framework from DAB | Kumar et al. ( |
| 20 | Acid and alkali catalysed transesterification coupled anaerobic fermentation |
| Recovery rate—7.8% biodiesel and 83.4% bioethanol | Integrated biofuel generation from marine macroalgae | Ashokkumar et al. ( |
| 21 | Valorisation of industrial waste and industrial flue for algal biomass production |
| Enhanced nutrient removal up to 75%; up tp 5% CO2 captured, elevated lipid accumulation up to 34% | Waste mitigation coupled carbon sequestration | Yadav et al. ( |
| 22 | Individual valorisation of algal metabolites |
| I. Supercritical fluid extraction with CO2—bioethanol generation II. Hydrothermal processing—for extraction of fucoidan and phlorotannin compounds | Various valorisation process for extraction of viable biotechnological products in a biorefinery viewpoint | Balboa et al. ( |
| 23 | Waste treatment and lipid production |
| I. Up to 80% clean odourless water with reduced COD obtained II. Enhanced lipid productivity | Bioremediation of dairy waste and lipid recovery in a biodiesel viewpoint | Kumar et al. ( |
| 24 | Effluent treatment of Palm Oil Mill effluent and biomass production for industrial applications |
| I. Integrated system showed pronounced nutrient uptake and carbon capture II. Lipid profile ideal for industrial usage | Bioremediation, carbon capture and exploitation of biomass—closed loop approach | Hariz et al. ( |
| 25 | Enhanced protein recovery using pulse electric field cyclic protein extraction |
| Extracted free protein during cultivation—96.6 ± 4.8% | A closed loop-biorefinery approach by continuous extraction of protein in the cultivation phase | Buchmann et al. ( |