Literature DB >> 35250375

BHLS 2 upgrade: τ spectra, muon HVP and the [ π 0 , η , η ' ] system.

M Benayoun1, L DelBuono1, F Jegerlehner2,3.   

Abstract

The generic hidden local symmetry (HLS) model has recently given rise to its BHLS 2 variant, defined by introducing symmetry breaking mostly in the vector meson sector; the central mechanism is a modification of the covariant derivative at the root of the HLS approach. However, the description of the τ dipion spectra, especially the Belle one, is not fully satisfactory, whereas the simultaneous dealing with its annihilation sector ( e + e - → π + π - / π + π - π 0 / π 0 γ / η γ / K + K - / K L K S ) is optimum. We show that this issue is solved by means of an additional breaking term which also allows us to consistently include the mixing properties of the [ π 0 , η , η ' ] system within this extended BHLS 2 ( EBHLS 2 ) scope. This mechanism, an extension of the usual 't Hooft determinant term, only affects the kinetic energy part of the BHLS 2 Lagrangian. One thus obtains a fair account for the τ dipion spectra which complements the fair account of the annihilation channels already reached. The Belle dipion spectrum is found to provide evidence in favor of a violation of the conserved vector current (CVC) in the τ lepton decay; this evidence is enforced by imposing the conditions < 0 | J μ q | [ q ' q ' ¯ ] ( p ) > = i p μ f q δ q q ' , { [ q q ¯ ] , q = u , d , s } on EBHLS 2 axial current matrix elements. EBHLS 2 is found to recover the usual (completed) formulae for the [ π 0 , η , η ' ] mixing parameters, and the global fits return mixing parameter values in agreement with expectations and better uncertainties. Updating the muon hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP), one also argues that the strong tension between the KLOE and BaBar pion form factors imposes to provide two solutions, namely a μ H V P - L O ( KLOE ) = 687.48 ± 2.93 and a μ H V P - L O ( BaBar ) = 692.53 ± 2.95 , in units of 10 - 10 , rather than some combination of these. Taking into account common systematics, their differences from the experimental BNL-FNAL average value exhibit significance > 5.4 σ (KLOE) and > 4.1 σ (BaBar), with fit probabilities favoring the former.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35250375      PMCID: PMC8884113          DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10096-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields        ISSN: 1434-6044            Impact factor:   4.991


  13 in total

1.  Hidden local symmetry for anomalous processes with isospin- and SU(3)-breaking effects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev D Part Fields       Date:  1996-11-01

2.  Effective hadron dynamics: From meson masses to the proton spin puzzle.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev D Part Fields       Date:  1993-07-01

3.  Radiative corrections to pi l2 decays.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1993-11-29       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Is the rho meson a dynamical gauge boson of hidden local symmetry?

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1985-03-25       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm.

Authors:  B Abi; T Albahri; S Al-Kilani; D Allspach; L P Alonzi; A Anastasi; A Anisenkov; F Azfar; K Badgley; S Baeßler; I Bailey; V A Baranov; E Barlas-Yucel; T Barrett; E Barzi; A Basti; F Bedeschi; A Behnke; M Berz; M Bhattacharya; H P Binney; R Bjorkquist; P Bloom; J Bono; E Bottalico; T Bowcock; D Boyden; G Cantatore; R M Carey; J Carroll; B C K Casey; D Cauz; S Ceravolo; R Chakraborty; S P Chang; A Chapelain; S Chappa; S Charity; R Chislett; J Choi; Z Chu; T E Chupp; M E Convery; A Conway; G Corradi; S Corrodi; L Cotrozzi; J D Crnkovic; S Dabagov; P M De Lurgio; P T Debevec; S Di Falco; P Di Meo; G Di Sciascio; R Di Stefano; B Drendel; A Driutti; V N Duginov; M Eads; N Eggert; A Epps; J Esquivel; M Farooq; R Fatemi; C Ferrari; M Fertl; A Fiedler; A T Fienberg; A Fioretti; D Flay; S B Foster; H Friedsam; E Frlež; N S Froemming; J Fry; C Fu; C Gabbanini; M D Galati; S Ganguly; A Garcia; D E Gastler; J George; L K Gibbons; A Gioiosa; K L Giovanetti; P Girotti; W Gohn; T Gorringe; J Grange; S Grant; F Gray; S Haciomeroglu; D Hahn; T Halewood-Leagas; D Hampai; F Han; E Hazen; J Hempstead; S Henry; A T Herrod; D W Hertzog; G Hesketh; A Hibbert; Z Hodge; J L Holzbauer; K W Hong; R Hong; M Iacovacci; M Incagli; C Johnstone; J A Johnstone; P Kammel; M Kargiantoulakis; M Karuza; J Kaspar; D Kawall; L Kelton; A Keshavarzi; D Kessler; K S Khaw; Z Khechadoorian; N V Khomutov; B Kiburg; M Kiburg; O Kim; S C Kim; Y I Kim; B King; N Kinnaird; M Korostelev; I Kourbanis; E Kraegeloh; V A Krylov; A Kuchibhotla; N A Kuchinskiy; K R Labe; J LaBounty; M Lancaster; M J Lee; S Lee; S Leo; B Li; D Li; L Li; I Logashenko; A Lorente Campos; A Lucà; G Lukicov; G Luo; A Lusiani; A L Lyon; B MacCoy; R Madrak; K Makino; F Marignetti; S Mastroianni; S Maxfield; M McEvoy; W Merritt; A A Mikhailichenko; J P Miller; S Miozzi; J P Morgan; W M Morse; J Mott; E Motuk; A Nath; D Newton; H Nguyen; M Oberling; R Osofsky; J-F Ostiguy; S Park; G Pauletta; G M Piacentino; R N Pilato; K T Pitts; B Plaster; D Počanić; N Pohlman; C C Polly; M Popovic; J Price; B Quinn; N Raha; S Ramachandran; E Ramberg; N T Rider; J L Ritchie; B L Roberts; D L Rubin; L Santi; D Sathyan; H Schellman; C Schlesier; A Schreckenberger; Y K Semertzidis; Y M Shatunov; D Shemyakin; M Shenk; D Sim; M W Smith; A Smith; A K Soha; M Sorbara; D Stöckinger; J Stapleton; D Still; C Stoughton; D Stratakis; C Strohman; T Stuttard; H E Swanson; G Sweetmore; D A Sweigart; M J Syphers; D A Tarazona; T Teubner; A E Tewsley-Booth; K Thomson; V Tishchenko; N H Tran; W Turner; E Valetov; D Vasilkova; G Venanzoni; V P Volnykh; T Walton; M Warren; A Weisskopf; L Welty-Rieger; M Whitley; P Winter; A Wolski; M Wormald; W Wu; C Yoshikawa
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Calculation of the Hadronic Vacuum Polarization Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment.

Authors:  T Blum; P A Boyle; V Gülpers; T Izubuchi; L Jin; C Jung; A Jüttner; C Lehner; A Portelli; J T Tsang
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 7.  Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG).

Authors:  S Aoki; Y Aoki; D Bečirević; C Bernard; T Blum; G Colangelo; M Della Morte; P Dimopoulos; S Dürr; H Fukaya; M Golterman; Steven Gottlieb; S Hashimoto; U M Heller; R Horsley; A Jüttner; T Kaneko; L Lellouch; H Leutwyler; C-J D Lin; V Lubicz; E Lunghi; R Mawhinney; T Onogi; C Pena; C T Sachrajda; S R Sharpe; S Simula; R Sommer; A Vladikas; U Wenger; H Wittig
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.590

8.  Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD.

Authors:  Sz Borsanyi; Z Fodor; J N Guenther; C Hoelbling; S D Katz; L Lellouch; T Lippert; K Miura; L Parato; K K Szabo; F Stokes; B C Toth; Cs Torok; L Varnhorst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Dispersive analysis of the pion transition form factor.

Authors:  M Hoferichter; B Kubis; S Leupold; F Niecknig; S P Schneider
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.590

10.  The [Formula: see text] transition form factor from space- and time-like experimental data.

Authors:  R Escribano; P Masjuan; P Sanchez-Puertas
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.