Literature DB >> 33891447

Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm.

B Abi1, T Albahri2, S Al-Kilani3, D Allspach4, L P Alonzi5, A Anastasi6, A Anisenkov7, F Azfar1, K Badgley4, S Baeßler8, I Bailey9, V A Baranov10, E Barlas-Yucel11, T Barrett12, E Barzi4, A Basti6,13, F Bedeschi6, A Behnke14, M Berz15, M Bhattacharya16, H P Binney5, R Bjorkquist12, P Bloom17, J Bono4, E Bottalico6,13, T Bowcock2, D Boyden14, G Cantatore18,19, R M Carey20, J Carroll2, B C K Casey4, D Cauz21,22, S Ceravolo23, R Chakraborty24, S P Chang25,26, A Chapelain12, S Chappa4, S Charity4, R Chislett3, J Choi25, Z Chu27, T E Chupp28, M E Convery4, A Conway29, G Corradi23, S Corrodi30, L Cotrozzi6,13, J D Crnkovic31,11,16, S Dabagov23, P M De Lurgio30, P T Debevec11, S Di Falco6, P Di Meo32, G Di Sciascio33, R Di Stefano32,34, B Drendel4, A Driutti18,22,24, V N Duginov10, M Eads14, N Eggert12, A Epps14, J Esquivel4, M Farooq28, R Fatemi24, C Ferrari6,35, M Fertl36,5, A Fiedler14, A T Fienberg5, A Fioretti6,35, D Flay29, S B Foster20, H Friedsam4, E Frlež8, N S Froemming14,5, J Fry8, C Fu27, C Gabbanini6,35, M D Galati6,13, S Ganguly4,11, A Garcia5, D E Gastler20, J George29, L K Gibbons12, A Gioiosa6,37, K L Giovanetti38, P Girotti6,13, W Gohn24, T Gorringe24, J Grange30,28, S Grant3, F Gray39, S Haciomeroglu25, D Hahn4, T Halewood-Leagas2, D Hampai23, F Han24, E Hazen20, J Hempstead5, S Henry1, A T Herrod2, D W Hertzog5, G Hesketh3, A Hibbert2, Z Hodge5, J L Holzbauer16, K W Hong8, R Hong30,24, M Iacovacci32,40, M Incagli6, C Johnstone4, J A Johnstone4, P Kammel5, M Kargiantoulakis4, M Karuza18,41, J Kaspar5, D Kawall29, L Kelton24, A Keshavarzi42, D Kessler29, K S Khaw27,43,5, Z Khechadoorian12, N V Khomutov10, B Kiburg4, M Kiburg4,17, O Kim25,26, S C Kim12, Y I Kim25, B King2, N Kinnaird20, M Korostelev9, I Kourbanis4, E Kraegeloh28, V A Krylov10, A Kuchibhotla11, N A Kuchinskiy10, K R Labe12, J LaBounty5, M Lancaster42, M J Lee25, S Lee25, S Leo11, B Li30,27, D Li27, L Li27, I Logashenko7, A Lorente Campos24, A Lucà4, G Lukicov3, G Luo14, A Lusiani6,44, A L Lyon4, B MacCoy5, R Madrak4, K Makino15, F Marignetti32,34, S Mastroianni32, S Maxfield2, M McEvoy14, W Merritt4, A A Mikhailichenko12, J P Miller20, S Miozzi33, J P Morgan4, W M Morse31, J Mott20,4, E Motuk3, A Nath32,40, D Newton2, H Nguyen4, M Oberling30, R Osofsky5, J-F Ostiguy4, S Park25, G Pauletta21,22, G M Piacentino33,37, R N Pilato6,13, K T Pitts11, B Plaster24, D Počanić8, N Pohlman14, C C Polly4, M Popovic4, J Price2, B Quinn16, N Raha6, S Ramachandran30, E Ramberg4, N T Rider12, J L Ritchie45, B L Roberts20, D L Rubin12, L Santi21,22, D Sathyan20, H Schellman46, C Schlesier11, A Schreckenberger20,11,45, Y K Semertzidis25,26, Y M Shatunov7, D Shemyakin7, M Shenk14, D Sim2, M W Smith6,5, A Smith2, A K Soha4, M Sorbara33,47, D Stöckinger48, J Stapleton4, D Still4, C Stoughton4, D Stratakis4, C Strohman12, T Stuttard3, H E Swanson5, G Sweetmore42, D A Sweigart12, M J Syphers4,14, D A Tarazona15, T Teubner2, A E Tewsley-Booth28, K Thomson2, V Tishchenko31, N H Tran20, W Turner2, E Valetov9,15,43, D Vasilkova3, G Venanzoni6, V P Volnykh10, T Walton4, M Warren3, A Weisskopf15, L Welty-Rieger4, M Whitley2, P Winter30, A Wolski2, M Wormald2, W Wu16, C Yoshikawa4.   

Abstract

We present the first results of the Fermilab National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly a_{μ}≡(g_{μ}-2)/2. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency ω_{a} between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in a magnetic storage ring. The storage ring magnetic field is measured using nuclear magnetic resonance probes calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency ω[over ˜]_{p}^{'} in a spherical water sample at 34.7 °C. The ratio ω_{a}/ω[over ˜]_{p}^{'}, together with known fundamental constants, determines a_{μ}(FNAL)=116 592 040(54)×10^{-11} (0.46 ppm). The result is 3.3 standard deviations greater than the standard model prediction and is in excellent agreement with the previous Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) E821 measurement. After combination with previous measurements of both μ^{+} and μ^{-}, the new experimental average of a_{μ}(Exp)=116 592 061(41)×10^{-11} (0.35 ppm) increases the tension between experiment and theory to 4.2 standard deviations.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33891447     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  14 in total

1.  Prediction for magnetic moment of the muon informs a test of the standard model of particle physics.

Authors:  Harvey B Meyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  What's next for physics' standard model? Muon results throw theories into confusion.

Authors:  Davide Castelvecchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  How the revamped Large Hadron Collider will hunt for new physics.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gibney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Physicists spellbound by deepening mystery of muon particle's magnetism.

Authors:  Davide Castelvecchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Observation of supersymmetry and its spontaneous breaking in a trapped ion quantum simulator.

Authors:  M-L Cai; Y-K Wu; Q-X Mei; W-D Zhao; Y Jiang; L Yao; L He; Z-C Zhou; L-M Duan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  BHLS 2 upgrade: τ spectra, muon HVP and the [ π 0 , η , η ' ] system.

Authors:  M Benayoun; L DelBuono; F Jegerlehner
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.991

7.  Kaon electromagnetic form factors in dispersion theory.

Authors:  D Stamen; D Hariharan; M Hoferichter; B Kubis; P Stoffer
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.991

8.  Holographic QCD and the muon anomalous magnetic moment.

Authors:  Josef Leutgeb; Jonas Mager; Anton Rebhan
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.590

9.  Probing the explanation of the muon (g-2) anomaly and thermal light dark matter with the semi-visible dark photon channel.

Authors:  C Cazzaniga; P Odagiu; E Depero; L Molina Bueno; Yu M Andreev; D Banerjee; J Bernhard; V E Burtsev; N Charitonidis; A G Chumakov; D Cooke; P Crivelli; A V Dermenev; S V Donskov; R R Dusaev; T Enik; A Feshchenko; V N Frolov; A Gardikiotis; S G Gerassimov; S Girod; S N Gninenko; M Hösgen; V A Kachanov; A E Karneyeu; G Kekelidze; B Ketzer; D V Kirpichnikov; M M Kirsanov; V N Kolosov; I V Konorov; S G Kovalenko; V A Kramarenko; L V Kravchuk; N V Krasnikov; S V Kuleshov; V E Lyubovitskij; V Lysan; V A Matveev; Yu V Mikhailov; D V Peshekhonov; V A Polyakov; B Radics; R Rojas; A Rubbia; V D Samoylenko; D Shchukin; H Sieber; V O Tikhomirov; I V Tlisova; D A Tlisov; A N Toropin; A Yu Trifonov; B I Vasilishin; G Vasquez Arenas; P V Volkov; V Yu Volkov; P Ulloa
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.590

10.  Short-distance constraints for the longitudinal component of the hadronic light-by-light amplitude: an update.

Authors:  G Colangelo; F Hagelstein; M Hoferichter; L Laub; P Stoffer
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.