Literature DB >> 35250342

Energetics and Biomechanics of Uphill, Downhill and Level Running in Highly-Cushioned Carbon Fiber Midsole Plated Shoes.

Iain Hunter1, Charles Bradshaw1, Aubree McLeod1, Jared Ward1, Tyler Standifird2.   

Abstract

Road-racing shoes recently experienced major changes. In the recent past, lightweight, thin midsole shoes were thought to help runners maximize their performance. But, in 2017, Nike released the Vaporfly shoe which transformed the thinking about racing shoe design. Incorporating a curved carbon fiber plate embedded in a thick, compliant and resilient midsole resulted in a reduced metabolic cost across a range of running speeds. We hypothesized the new style of shoes would be less effective uphill than downhill due to the larger ground reaction forces and hence greater elastic energy storage in the shoe during downhill running. Eighteen runners completed two days of testing, each comprising two trials of two shoe models (Saucony Endorphin Pro (EP) and Type A) and three grade conditions (uphill, level and downhill), i.e. 12 trials per day. Oxygen uptake, ground reaction forces, and lower-body kinematics were captured during each condition. Comparisons of the percent metabolic benefit were made between shoes for each grade. Stride rate, ground time, peak vertical force, and flight time were regressed with the percent metabolic benefit of the EP over the Type A shoe across grades. Metabolic benefits of the Endorphin Pro were similar across the three grade conditions (p = 0.778). No significant correlations were observed between how much benefit one runner got over another specific to grade. The new style of road-racing shoes effectively decreases metabolic cost equally across grades. Differences in running mechanics between runners did not explain greater individual metabolic benefits between shoe conditions during uphill or downhill running. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Marathon; economy; footwear; performance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35250342      PMCID: PMC8851112          DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2022.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  15 in total

1.  Kinematic and postural characteristics of sprint running on sloping surfaces.

Authors:  G P Paradisis; C B Cooke
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.337

2.  Running economy, mechanics, and marathon racing shoes.

Authors:  Iain Hunter; Aubree McLeod; Dru Valentine; Tyler Low; Jared Ward; Ron Hager
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  The Biomechanics of Competitive Male Runners in Three Marathon Racing Shoes: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Shalaya Kipp; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Ground reaction force profiles during inclined running at iso-efficiency speeds.

Authors:  Lauren R Williams; Tyler W Standifird; Andrew Creer; Hailey B Fong; Douglas W Powell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Oxygen consumption and energy expenditure of level versus downhill running.

Authors:  R A Robergs; D R Wagner; K M Skemp
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  The role of elastic energy storage and recovery in downhill and uphill running.

Authors:  Kristine L Snyder; Rodger Kram; Jinger S Gottschall
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  A Randomized Crossover Study Investigating the Running Economy of Highly-Trained Male and Female Distance Runners in Marathon Racing Shoes versus Track Spikes.

Authors:  Kyle R Barnes; Andrew E Kilding
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Implications of sample size and acquired number of steps to investigate running biomechanics.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Cristina Ioana Pirscoveanu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Longitudinal bending stiffness does not affect running economy in Nike Vaporfly Shoes.

Authors:  Laura A Healey; Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 13.077

10.  Metabolic cost of level, uphill, and downhill running in highly cushioned shoes with carbon-fiber plates.

Authors:  Clarissa S Whiting; Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 13.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.