Literature DB >> 35247926

Neoantigen Identification and Response to Adoptive Cell Transfer in Anti-PD-1 Naïve and Experienced Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

Shoshana T Levi1, Amy R Copeland2, Shirley Nah1, Jessica S Crystal3, Gabriel D Ivey4, Almin Lalani5, Mohammad Jafferji6, Bradley S White1, Neilesh B Parikh1, Vid Leko1, Sri Krishna1, Frank Lowery1, Todd D Prickett1, Jared J Gartner1, Li Jia7, Yong F Li1, Abraham Sachs1, Sivasish Sindiri1, Welles Robinson1, Billel Gasmi1, James C Yang1, Stephanie L Goff1, Steven A Rosenberg1, Paul F Robbins1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) agents and adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are prominent immunotherapies used for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Both therapies rely on activation of lymphocytes that target shared tumor antigens or neoantigens. Recent analysis of patients with metastatic melanoma who underwent treatment with TIL ACT at the NCI demonstrated decreased responses in patients previously treated with anti-PD-1 agents. We aimed to find a basis for the difference in response rates between anti-PD-1 naïve and experienced patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined the tumor mutational burden (TMB) of resected tumors and the repertoire of neoantigens targeted by autologous TIL in a cohort of 112 anti-PD-1 naïve and 69 anti-PD-1 experienced patients.
RESULTS: Anti-PD-1 naïve patients were found to possess tumors with higher TMBs (352.0 vs. 213.5, P = 0.005) and received TIL reactive with more neoantigens (2 vs. 1, P = 0.003) compared with anti-PD-1 experienced patients. Among patients treated with TIL ACT, TMB and number of neoantigens identified were higher in ACT responders than ACT nonresponders in both anti-PD-1 naïve and experienced patients. Among patients with comparable TMBs and predicted neoantigen loads, treatment products administered to anti-PD-1 naïve patients were more likely to contain T cells reactive against neoantigens than treatment products for anti-PD-1 experienced patients (2.5 vs. 1, P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that decreases in TMB and targeted neoantigens partially account for the difference in response to ACT and that additional factors likely influence responses in these patients. See related commentary by Blass and Ott, p. 2980. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35247926      PMCID: PMC9288495          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-4499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  51 in total

1.  Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Caroline Robert; Luc Thomas; Igor Bondarenko; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey Weber; Claus Garbe; Celeste Lebbe; Jean-François Baurain; Alessandro Testori; Jean-Jacques Grob; Neville Davidson; Jon Richards; Michele Maio; Axel Hauschild; Wilson H Miller; Pere Gascon; Michal Lotem; Kaan Harmankaya; Ramy Ibrahim; Stephen Francis; Tai-Tsang Chen; Rachel Humphrey; Axel Hoos; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Development of cancer immunotherapies based on identification of the genes encoding cancer regression antigens.

Authors:  S A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-11-20       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Adoptive cell therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: evaluation of intensive myeloablative chemoradiation preparative regimens.

Authors:  Mark E Dudley; James C Yang; Richard Sherry; Marybeth S Hughes; Richard Royal; Udai Kammula; Paul F Robbins; JianPing Huang; Deborah E Citrin; Susan F Leitman; John Wunderlich; Nicholas P Restifo; Armen Thomasian; Stephanie G Downey; Franz O Smith; Jacob Klapper; Kathleen Morton; Carolyn Laurencot; Donald E White; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006).

Authors:  Jacob Schachter; Antoni Ribas; Georgina V Long; Ana Arance; Jean-Jacques Grob; Laurent Mortier; Adil Daud; Matteo S Carlino; Catriona McNeil; Michal Lotem; James Larkin; Paul Lorigan; Bart Neyns; Christian Blank; Teresa M Petrella; Omid Hamid; Honghong Zhou; Scot Ebbinghaus; Nageatte Ibrahim; Caroline Robert
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Tumor antigens recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes: present perspectives for specific immunotherapy.

Authors:  T Boon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-05-08       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Unique Neoantigens Arise from Somatic Mutations in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Maria R Parkhurst; Paul F Robbins; Eric Tran; Todd D Prickett; Jared J Gartner; Li Jia; Gabriel Ivey; Yong F Li; Mona El-Gamil; Almin Lalani; Jessica S Crystal; Abraham Sachs; Eric Groh; Satyajit Ray; Lien T Ngo; Scott Kivitz; Anna Pasetto; Rami Yossef; Frank J Lowery; Stephanie L Goff; Winifred Lo; Gal Cafri; Drew C Deniger; Parisa Malekzadeh; Mojgan Ahmadzadeh; John R Wunderlich; Robert P T Somerville; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 39.397

7.  Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapy Induces Dynamic Changes in PD-1-CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating T Cells.

Authors:  Sema Kurtulus; Asaf Madi; Giulia Escobar; Max Klapholz; Jackson Nyman; Elena Christian; Mathias Pawlak; Danielle Dionne; Junrong Xia; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Vijay K Kuchroo; Aviv Regev; Ana C Anderson
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Efficacy of adoptive cell transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after lymphopenia induction for metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Shari Pilon-Thomas; Lisa Kuhn; Sabine Ellwanger; William Janssen; Erica Royster; Suroosh Marzban; Ragini Kudchadkar; Jonathan Zager; Geoffrey Gibney; Vernon K Sondak; Jeffrey Weber; James J Mulé; Amod A Sarnaik
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.456

9.  Combination therapy with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 leads to distinct immunologic changes in vivo.

Authors:  Rituparna Das; Rakesh Verma; Mario Sznol; Chandra Sekhar Boddupalli; Scott N Gettinger; Harriet Kluger; Margaret Callahan; Jedd D Wolchok; Ruth Halaban; Madhav V Dhodapkar; Kavita M Dhodapkar
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  CD39 Expression Defines Cell Exhaustion in Tumor-Infiltrating CD8+ T Cells.

Authors:  Fernando P Canale; María C Ramello; Nicolás Núñez; Cintia L Araujo Furlan; Sabrina N Bossio; Melisa Gorosito Serrán; Jimena Tosello Boari; Andrés Del Castillo; Marta Ledesma; Christine Sedlik; Eliane Piaggio; Adriana Gruppi; Eva A Acosta Rodríguez; Carolina L Montes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  1 in total

1.  PD-1 Inhibition-Trouble for Subsequent TIL Therapy in Patients with Melanoma?

Authors:  Eryn Blass; Patrick A Ott
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 13.801

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.