| Literature DB >> 35244069 |
Haitao Huang1, Hao Chen2, Xiao Liang2, Xiuting Chen1, Xiaoxin Chen1, Can Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown miR-328-3p increased in atrial fibrillation (AF), but some researches indicated no difference or even decreased. This inconsistent result confuses researchers, and it is urgent to know the truth. This study is to assess the association between miR-328-3p levels in plasma/atrial tissue and patients with AF.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35244069 PMCID: PMC8896476 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Flow diagram of literature search and selection.
Characteristics of the included studies.
| First Author | Sample size | Age | Gender (male/female) | |||||||||
| (Ref. No.) | Year | Country | Sample type | SR | AF | SR | AF |
| SR | AF | Methods | NOS |
| Liu et al[ | 2014 | China | LAA | 6 | 6 | 47.5 ± 8.4 | 49.4 ± 11.9 | .79 | 3/3 | 2/4 | Microarray | 7 |
| da Silva et al[ | 2018 | Brazil | Plasma | 15 | 21 | 55.0 ± 12 | 57.7 ± 10.5 | .8 | 7/8 | 15/6 | RT-qPCR | 8 |
| Liu et al[ | 2016 | China | Plasma | 40 | 40 | 52.3 ± 11 | 53.9 ± 13.4 | .56 | 29/11 | 29/11 | RT-qPCR | 8 |
| Lu et al[ | 2010 | China | RAA | 10 | 12 | 38.8 ± 11.3 | 55.6 ± 7.4 | .00 | 5/5 | 4/8 | RT-qPCR | 5 |
| McManus et al[ | 2014 | American | whole blood | 2185 | 153 | 65.6 ± 8.7 | 72.7 ± 8.2 | .00 | 932/1253 | 93/60 | RT-qPCR | 5 |
| Soeki et al[ | 2016 | Japan | Plasma | 10 | 30 | 65 ± 3 | 63 ± 2 | .02 | 6/4 | 22/8 | RT-qPCR | 7 |
| Zhelankin et al[ | 2020 | Russian | Plasma | 30 | 30 | 47.3 ± 5.6 | 67.6 ± 10 | <.01 | 15/15 | 15/15 | RT-qPCR | 6 |
| Masè et al[ | 2019 | Italy | RAA | 21 | 9 | 74.1 ± 10.1 | 74 ± 4.4 | .98 | 18/3 | 6/3 | RT-qPCR | 6 |
| Biliczki et al[ | 2019 | Germany | Atrial tissue | 8 | 14 | 55 ± 11 | 70 ± 9 | .00 | 5/3 | 9/5 | RT-qPCR | 8 |
| Xu et al[ | 2021 | China | Plasma | 96 | 109 | 60.3 ± 5.1 | 62.6 ± 7.7 | .01 | 39/57 | 40/69 | RT-qPCR | 7 |
| Sieweke et al[ | 2020 | Germany | Plasma | 60 | 21 | 58.2 ± 19 | 71.8 ± 11.3 | .00 | 42/18 | 14/7 | RT-qPCR | 7 |
| Galenko et al[ | 2019 | American | Plasma | 48 | 110 | 57.8 ± 11.5 | 63.3 ± 10.5 | .00 | 21/27 | 66/44 | RT-qPCR | 7 |
AF = atrial fibrillation, LAA = left atrial appendage, NOS = The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale score, RAA = right atrial appendage, RT-qPCR = quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, SR = sinus rhythm.
Quality assessment based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
| Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Total score | Quality |
| Liu et al, 2014 | ♦♦♦ | ♦♦ | ♦♦ | 7 | High |
| da Silva et al, 2018 | ♦♦♦♦ | ♦♦ | ♦♦ | 8 | High |
| Liu et al, 2016 | ♦♦♦♦ | ♦♦ | ♦♦ | 8 | High |
| Lu et al, 2010 | ♦♦♦ | – | ♦♦ | 5 | Low |
| McManus et al, 2014 | ♦♦♦ | – | ♦♦♦ | 6 | Low |
| Soeki et al, 2016 | ♦♦♦♦ | ♦ | ♦♦ | 7 | High |
| Zhelankin et al, 2020 | ♦♦♦♦ | ♦ | ♦ | 6 | Low |
| Masè et al, 2019 | ♦♦♦ | ♦ | ♦♦ | 6 | Low |
| Biliczki et al, 2019 | ♦♦♦♦ | ♦♦ | ♦♦ | 8 | High |
| Xu et al, 2021 | ♦♦♦♦ | ♦ | ♦♦ | 7 | High |
| Sieweke et al, 2020 | ♦♦♦♦ | ♦ | ♦♦ | 7 | High |
| Galenko et al, 2019 | ♦♦♦♦ | ♦ | ♦♦ | 7 | High |
Selection, representativeness of studies (score 0–4); Comparability, comparability of studies (score 0–2); Outcome, assessment of outcome and follow up (score 0–3). Low, high risk of bias (total score 0–6); High, low risk of bias (total score 7–9).
Figure 2Forest plot of standardized mean difference with corresponding 95% CI of studies on the association between miR-328-3p level and atrial fibrillation. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.
Figure 3The results of sensitivity analysis and publication bias. (A) Heterogeneity analysis with a Galbraith plot. (B) Sensitivity analyses of miR-328-3p level difference between AF and control group by excluding one study at a time. (C) The funnel plot of miR-328-3p level difference between AF and controls. The SMD effect size was estimated using random-effects model. (D) Egger test to detect publication bias. AF = atrial fibrillation, SMD = standardized mean difference.
The results of meta regression.
| Covariates | Coef. | S.E. | 95% CI |
| Adjusted |
|
| Comorbidity | 2.53 | 1.11 | (0.05, 5.01) | 3.082 | 30.13% | .047 |
| Year of publication | –0.37 | 0.2 | (–0.82, –0.08) | 3.577 | 18.93% | .096 |
| Region | 0.88 | 0.71 | (–.070, 2.45) | 4.195 | 4.92% | .243 |
| Specimen type | 0.76 | 0.65 | (–0.70, 2.22) | 4.289 | 2.77% | .274 |
| Sample size | 0.3 | 0.68 | (–1.22, 1.81) | 4.823 | –9.32% | .672 |
| Detection method | 0.38 | 1.61 | (–3.21, 3.96) | 4.94 | –11.98% | .818 |
REML estimate of between-study variance.τ2 = study between the component of variation size, adjusted R 2 = the current covariate can explain the size of heterogeneity, CI = confidence interval, Coef. = regression coefficients, SE = standard error of regression coefficients.
Subgroup analysis of miRNA-328-3p expression levels in AF.
| Random-effects model | Heterogeneity test | ||||||
| Stratification group | N | References | SMD (95% CI) |
|
|
|
|
| Overall | 12 | ALL | 0.82 (0.22, 1.42) | .007 | 134.27 | 91.8 | <0.001 |
| Comorbidity | |||||||
| Consistent | 7 |
[ | 0.15 (–0.20, 0.50) | .398 | 19.81 | 69.7 | 0.003 |
| Variance | 5 |
[ | 2.60 (0.38, 4.81) | .022 | 109.58 | 96.3 | <0.001 |
| Year of publication | |||||||
| 2010∼2018 | 6 |
[ | 1.84 (0.10, 3.57) | .038 | 112.65 | 95.6 | <0.001 |
| 2019∼2021 | 6 |
[ | 0.21 (–0.17, 0.59) | .287 | 18.75 | 73.3 | 0.002 |
| Specimen type | |||||||
| Plasma | 7 |
[ | 0.34 (–0.14, 0.81) | .167 | 45.25 | 86.7 | <0.001 |
| Atrial tissue | 5 |
[ | 1.96 (–0.36, 4.28) | .098 | 78.28 | 94.9 | <0.001 |
| Sample size | |||||||
| <30 | 6 |
[ | 0.58 (–0.58, 1.74) | .33 | 53.76 | 90.7 | <0.001 |
| ≥30 | 6 |
[ | 1.10 (0.35, 1.86) | .004 | 75.19 | 93.3 | <0.001 |
| Study region | |||||||
| Asia | 6 |
[ | 1.77 (0.41, 3.13) | .011 | 112.65 | 95.6 | <0.001 |
| America | 2 |
[ | 0.36 (0.05, 0.66) | .022 | 0.14 | 0 | 0.704 |
| Europe | 4 |
[ | 0.06 (–0.54, 0.67) | .837 | 10.65 | 71.8 | 0.014 |
AF = atrial fibrillation, CI = confidence interval, SMD = standard mean difference, N = number of literatures, I = the variation in SMD attributable to heterogeneity; Ph = P value of Q test for heterogeneity test.