| Literature DB >> 35243070 |
Mohammad Afzal Hossain1, Tanvir Ahmed1, Md Sakib Hossain1, Pappu Dey1, Shafaet Ahmed1, Md Monir Hossain1.
Abstract
This research work aimed to optimize the fermentation time, temperature, and relative humidity of the black tea produced from Bangladesh Tea 2 (BT-2) variety by observing their quality parameters. Total theaflavin (TF), thearubigin (TR), the ratio of TF: TR, total liquor color (TLC), high polymeric substances (HPS), and total phenolic content (TPC) were evaluated for quality measurements of BT-2 black tea. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with Box-Behnken design (BBD) was applied to optimize fermentation time, temperature, and relative humidity as well as evaluate the effects of optimized conditions on the quality of made tea. The results obtained from the response surface optimization affirmed that under the optimum conditions of time (80.14 min), temperature (28.76 °C), and relative humidity (92.30%), the model showed the value of TF (0.69%), TR (5.57%), HPS (8.61%), TLC (3.05%), and TPC (7.95 GAE g/100g tea). Moreover, the optimized model found that the TF:TR value was 1:9.13, which is close to black tea's optimum quality. The values observed in experiments were highly congruent with the predicted value by the regression model. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test revealed that the model was significant for TF, TR, HPS, TLC, TPC, and TF:TR values of prepared BT-2 black tea at different levels (p < 0.001 to p < 0.01). The composite desirability of the model was 0.93, which suggests that the developed model could be utilized effectively to maintain the quality parameters of BT-2 black tea during fermentation.Entities:
Keywords: BT-2 black tea; Fermentation; Optimization; TF:TR; Theaflavin (TF); Thearubigin (TR)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35243070 PMCID: PMC8857412 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Independent variables and coded values for the optimization of the extraction process.
| Independent Variables | Code Units | Coded Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Time (min.) | X1 | 70 | 85 | 100 |
| Temperature (°C) | X2 | 25 | 30 | 35 |
| Relative Humidity (%) | X3 | 75 | 85 | 95 |
BBD and response of different parameters at different fermentation conditions.
| Run | Time (min.) X1 | Temperature (°C) X2 | RH (%) X3 | TF (%) | TR (%) | HPS (%) | TLC (%) | TPC (GAE g/100g tea) | TF:TR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 35 | 85 | 0.29 | 6.67 | 9.02 | 3.79 | 6.646 | 1:17.8 |
| 2 | 85 | 35 | 75 | 0.49 | 3.71 | 6.01 | 2.69 | 10.57 | 1:5.37 |
| 3 | 85 | 25 | 95 | 0.86 | 5.56 | 6.47 | 2.72 | 8.95 | 1:6.29 |
| 4 | 70 | 30 | 75 | 1.05 | 4.71 | 6.12 | 2.78 | 12.95 | 1:4.15 |
| 5 | 70 | 30 | 95 | 0.77 | 6.52 | 8.53 | 2.71 | 11.11 | 1:7.50 |
| 6 | 85 | 30 | 85 | 0.67 | 5.25 | 9.89 | 3.81 | 6.8 | 1:9.59 |
| 7 | 100 | 30 | 95 | 0.48 | 4.35 | 6.57 | 2.72 | 5.11 | 1:17.79 |
| 8 | 70 | 35 | 85 | 0.95 | 3.21 | 4.8 | 2.83 | 9.8 | 1:7.41 |
| 9 | 85 | 30 | 85 | 0.81 | 4.58 | 6.35 | 2.69 | 6.49 | 1:10.94 |
| 10 | 70 | 25 | 85 | 0.79 | 3.63 | 6.58 | 3.01 | 14.80 | 1:5.68 |
| 11 | 85 | 25 | 75 | 0.45 | 6.61 | 9.09 | 3.72 | 12.19 | 1:3.33 |
| 12 | 85 | 30 | 85 | 0.56 | 5.39 | 10.61 | 3.98 | 6.80 | 1:9.63 |
| 13 | 100 | 30 | 75 | 0.46 | 8.62 | 10.52 | 4.17 | 10.65 | 1:4.04 |
| 14 | 85 | 35 | 95 | 0.59 | 5.21 | 10.61 | 3.95 | 5.72 | 1:12.78 |
| 15 | 100 | 25 | 85 | 0.62 | 4.69 | 6.62 | 2.72 | 6.26 | 1:5.24 |
RH: relative humidity; TF: total theaflavin; TR: total thearubigin; HPS: high polymeric substance; TLC: total liquor color; TPC: total phenolic content.
Analysis of variance for effects of time, temperature, and relative humidity on the biochemical parameters in made tea.
| Source | TF | TR | HPS | TLC | TPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 0.0016∗∗ | 0.0007∗∗ | 0.0063∗∗ | 0.0003∗∗ | <0.0001∗∗ |
| X2 | 0.0440∗ | <0.0001∗∗ | 0.0002∗∗ | 0.0007∗∗ | <0.0001∗∗ |
| X3 | <0.0001∗∗ | <0.0001∗∗ | 0.0017∗∗ | 0.0036∗∗ | <0.0001∗∗ |
| X1X2 | 0.5649 | <0.0001∗∗ | 0.0671 | 0.0012∗∗ | 0.0002∗∗ |
| X1X3 | 0.5649 | <0.0001∗∗ | 0.0534 | 0.0126∗ | 0.0011∗∗ |
| X2X3 | 0.4191 | 0.0013∗∗ | 0.1107 | 0.0032∗∗ | 0.0250∗ |
| X12 | 0.4509 | <0.0001∗∗ | 0.0068∗∗ | 0.0013∗∗ | <0.0001∗∗ |
| X22 | 0.1753 | 0.0016∗∗ | 0.0010∗∗ | 0.0005∗∗ | 0.0005∗∗ |
| X32 | 0.4966 | <0.0001∗∗ | <0.0001∗∗ | 0.0005∗∗ | <0.0001∗∗ |
| R2 | 0.9742 | 0.9975 | 0.9857 | 0.9875 | 0.9974 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.9278 | 0.9931 | 0.9599 | 0.9651 | 0.9927 |
| Predicted R2 | 0.7296 | 0.9695 | 0.8578 | 0.8467 | 0.9646 |
| Adeq. precision | 15.574 | 56.718 | 17.610 | 16.412 | 46.151 |
| F value | 21 | 225.53 | 38.19 | 43.98 | 211.60 |
| Prob > F | 0.0019 | <0.0001 | 0.0004 | 0.0003 | <0.0001 |
| CV (%) | 8.66 | 2.23 | 5.03 | 3.43 | 2.83 |
| Lack of fit | 1.00 | 1.90 | 0.84 | 1.81 | 3.03 |
Data are significant at different level: ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; Adeq.: adequate; TF: total theaflavin; TR: total thearubigin; HPS: high polymeric substance; TLC: total liquor color; TPC: total phenolic content.
Figure 1Response surface plots of interaction effects of fermentation time, temperature, and relative humidity on TF: Theaflavin (A, B, C); TR: Thearubigin (D, E, F); HPS: High Polymeric Substance (G, H, I); TLC: Total Liquor Color (J, K, L); TPC: Total Phenolic Content (M, N, O); TF:TR (P, Q, R).
Target values and Fit values of different parameters to achieve the optimum conditions.
| Parameters | TF:TR | TPC (GAE g/100g tea) | TLC (%) | HPS (%) | TR (%) | TF (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Max. | Max. | Max. | Max. | Max. | Max. |
| Predicted value | 1: 9.38 | 7.89 | 3.17 | 8.69 | 5.41 | 0.76 |
| Actual value | 1: 9.13 | 7.95 ± 0.51 | 3.05 ± 0.08 | 8.61 ± 0.25 | 5.57 ± 0.42 | 0.69 ± 0.07 |
Actual values expressed as mean ± standard deviation of the mean (n = 3).
Figure 2Graphical presentation of response optimization (where, y = predicted value, d = individual desirability out of 1, D = overall desirability out of 1).