Literature DB >> 35242666

Better clinical benefits and potential cost saving of an enhanced recovery pathways for laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Yue Yan1,2, Jie Cheng1, Kang Chen1, Ting-Fang Liu2, Guang Ning1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have been demonstrated to be clinically and economically effective for colorectal surgery. However, data are lacking to support the cost-effectiveness of ERPs for laparoscopic adrenalectomy, as well as potential economic loss. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of ERPs vs. conventional care (CC) for patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy.
METHODS: A single centered retrospective case-control study was performed. Patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy from January 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled. One inpatient ward used ERPs, whereas the other did not. Case control was used for matching (53 patients for each group). Postoperative outcomes were recorded up to 30 days after surgery. ERPs-specific costs were integrated into the model. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative real costs were collected for each patient via the hospital administration, which were reported in Renminbi. A bootstrap independent t-test was used for comparison.
RESULTS: The two groups were matched in terms of demographics and surgical details. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERPs group (2.54 days, P<0.001). The rate of complications was lower in the ERPs group (1 vs. 7 patients, P=0.031), there was no severe complications or morbidity. ERPs-specific costs were ¥656 per patient. The self-payment cost difference per patient between the two groups was ¥3,154.52 in favor of the ERPs group, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.113). The mean direct saving per patient in the ERPs group was ¥8,326.00, the total costs saving including indirect and potential overhead per patient was ¥18,247.60.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced recovery is cost-effective compared with conventional perioperative management for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Savings were noted in disposable materials, medicine and medical services, radiology and laboratory costs, with no increase in morbidity or duration. 2022 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy; cost-effectiveness; day surgery; enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); enhanced recovery pathway (ERP)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35242666      PMCID: PMC8825523          DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  32 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy with ileal urinary diversion: a multi-institutional, randomized, controlled trial from the Chinese bladder cancer consortium.

Authors:  Tianxin Lin; Kaiwen Li; Hao Liu; Xueyi Xue; Ning Xu; Yong Wei; Zhiwen Chen; Xiaozhou Zhou; Lin Qi; Wei He; Shiyu Tong; Fengshuo Jin; Xudong Liu; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Xin Gou; Weiyang He; Xu Zhang; Guoqiang Yang; Zhoujun Shen; Tianyuan Xu; Xin Xie; Wei Xue; Ming Cao; Jin Yang; Jianyun Hu; Fubao Chen; Peijun Li; Guangyong Li; Tong Xu; Ye Tian; Wenying Wang; Dongkui Song; Lei Shi; Xiaoming Yang; Yang Yang; Benkang Shi; Yaofeng Zhu; Xigao Liu; Jinchun Xing; Zhun Wu; Kaiyan Zhang; Wei Li; Chaozhao Liang; Cheng Yang; Wei Li; Jinchun Qi; Chuanliang Xu; Weidong Xu; Liqun Zhou; Lin Cai; En'ci Xu; Weizhong Cai; Minggao Weng; Yiming Su; Fangjian Zhou; Lijuan Jiang; Zhuowei Liu; Qiuhong Chen; Tiejun Pan; Bo Liu; Yu Zhou; Xin Gao; Jianguang Qiu; Jie Situ; Cheng Hu; Shan Chen; Yupeng Zheng; Jian Huang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Enhanced Recovery after Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Carmen Pozo; Shahrokh F Shariat; David D'Andrea; Harun Fajkovic; Mohammad Abufaraj
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity score is associated with treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Theresa M Koppie; Angel M Serio; Andrew J Vickers; Kinjal Vora; Guido Dalbagni; S Machele Donat; Harry W Herr; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Economic impact of an enhanced recovery pathway for oesophagectomy.

Authors:  L Lee; C Li; N Robert; E Latimer; F Carli; D S Mulder; G M Fried; L E Ferri; L S Feldman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Enhanced recovery pathway for urgent colectomy.

Authors:  Didier Roulin; Catherine Blanc; Mirza Muradbegovic; Dieter Hahnloser; Nicolas Demartines; Martin Hübner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Cost analysis of the very elderly admitted to intensive care units.

Authors:  Nicolas Chin-Yee; Gianni D'Egidio; Kednapa Thavorn; Daren Heyland; Kwadwo Kyeremanteng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  A challenging case of laparoscopic synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing's disease. Case report.

Authors:  Umberto Maestroni; Simona Cataldo; Valentina Moretti; Marco Baciarello; Giada Maspero; Francesco Ziglioli
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-08

8.  Impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia on healthcare cost and length of stay in hospital: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stacie Attrill; Sarahlouise White; Joanne Murray; Sue Hammond; Sebastian Doeltgen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chunhua Lin; Fengchun Wan; Youyi Lu; Guojun Li; Luxin Yu; Meng Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 10.  Cost of postoperative complications: How to avoid calculation errors.

Authors:  Roberto De la Plaza Llamas; José M Ramia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.