Literature DB >> 18404699

Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity score is associated with treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Theresa M Koppie1, Angel M Serio, Andrew J Vickers, Kinjal Vora, Guido Dalbagni, S Machele Donat, Harry W Herr, Bernard H Bochner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: By using the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), the authors characterized the impact of age and comorbidity on disease progression and overall survival after radical cystectomy (RC) for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Also evaluated was whether ACCI was associated with clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics.
METHODS: The authors evaluated 1121 patients treated by RC for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder at a single institution (1990-2004). Logistic regression was used to determine the relation between ACCI and clinical features. They evaluated the association between ACCI and overall and progression-free survival by using multivariate survival-time models with pathologic stage and nodal status as covariates.
RESULTS: ACCI scores increased during the study period (P = .009). Extravesical disease was present in 43% of patients with ACCI <or=2, 49% with ACCI 3-5, and 56% with ACCI >5 (P = .051). Despite their higher prevalence of extravesical disease, patients with higher ACCI were less likely to have lymph-node dissection (odds ratio, 0.55 and 0.35, respectively, for ACCI 3-5 and >5 vs <or=2; P = .005), and when it was performed, fewer lymph nodes were evaluated (P < .0005). Patients with higher ACCI were also less likely to have postoperative chemotherapy (odds ratio, 0.70 and 0.66, respectively, for ACCI 3-5 and >5 vs <or=2; P = .04). Higher ACCI was significantly associated with lower overall (P < .005) but not recurrence-free (P = .17) survival after RC.
CONCLUSIONS: Age and comorbidity among patients who underwent RC at a cancer referral hospital increased with time. Both age and comorbidity were associated with treatment selection and survival and should, therefore, be considered when comparing outcomes after RC. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18404699     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  81 in total

Review 1.  Challenging treatment decision-making in older urologic cancer patients.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Gilles Albrand; François Rozet; Hervé Lang; Elena Paillaud; Pierre Mongiat-Artus
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Cementless versus Cemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Usage, Costs, and Complications during the Inpatient Period.

Authors:  Chukwuweike U Gwam; Nicole E George; Jennifer I Etcheson; Samuel Rosas; Johannes F Plate; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  The impact of operative approaches on outcomes of middle and lower third esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ju-Wei Mu; Shu-Geng Gao; Qi Xue; You-Sheng Mao; Da-Li Wang; Jun Zhao; Yu-Shun Gao; Jin-Feng Huang; Jie He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Comorbidity negatively influences prognosis in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mario Fernández-Ruiz; Juan-Manuel Guerra-Vales; Francisco Colina-Ruizdelgado
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Extent of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: is bigger better?

Authors:  Debasish Sundi; Robert S Svatek; Matthew E Nielsen; Mark P Schoenberg; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2014

6.  Comparison of clinical characteristics of tuberculosis between two age groups at an Italian Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Elda Righi; Paola Della Siega; Maria Merelli; Nadia Castaldo; Anna Beltrame; Federico Pea; Chiara Temperoni; Claudio Scarparo; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Significance of age and comorbidity as prognostic indicators for patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Moon Soo Ha; In Ho Chang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Evaluating the utility of a preoperative nomogram for predicting 90-day mortality following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taylor; Andrew Feifer; Caroline J Savage; Alexandra C Maschino; Melanie Bernstein; Harry W Herr; S Machele Donat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Identification of underserved areas for urologic cancer care.

Authors:  Matthew Mossanen; Jason Izard; Jonathan L Wright; Jonathan D Harper; Michael P Porter; Kenn B Daratha; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Bladder cancer.

Authors:  David J Gallagher; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.