A P Jarrete1, L T Giollo-Junior2, J F Vilela-Martin3, I P Novais4, M A Delbin1, A Zanesco5. 1. Departamento de Biologia Estrutural e Funcional, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil. 2. Posto Médico Garrison - 5a Brigada de Cavalaria Blindada, Exército Brasileiro, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brasil. 3. Departamento de Medicina, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil. 4. Departamento de Saúde I, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Jequié, BA, Brasil. 5. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Meio-ambiente, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos, SP, Brasil.
Abstract
Evidence has shown that women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a greater risk of cardiovascular complications compared with men, but this sex difference is not clearly understood. This study assessed the microvascular function and circulatory biomarkers in postmenopausal women (PMW) with T2DM compared with diabetic men and their non-diabetic counterparts. Sixty participants were divided into nondiabetic PMW, PMW with T2DM, non-diabetic men, and diabetic men. Microvascular function was assessed using non-invasive equipment (EndoPAT®) and reported as reactive hyperemia index (RHI). Anthropometric and cardiovascular parameters were also measured. Two-way ANOVA was performed using sex (women or men) and T2DM (non-diabetic and diabetic) as the two factors. RHI impairment (1.97±0.14) was detected in diabetic PMW compared with women without T2DM (2.5±0.13) accompanied by lower adiponectin levels (T2DM: 9.3±1.2 and CTL: 13.8±1.8 ug/mL, P<0.05). An increase in the Nε-carboxymethyllysine (CML), nitrate/nitrite, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were observed in diabetic PMW compared to the other groups. Although a poor glycemia control was seen in diabetic men, neither RHI nor circulatory biomarkers were affected by T2DM. Multiple linear regression stratified by sex and T2DM identified some variables with RHI only in PMW with T2DM: HbA1c (P=0.003), body mass index (P=0.029), CML (P=0.032), and CRP (P=0.006). Diabetic PMW were more susceptible to the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia than men, showing microvascular dysfunction with high levels of pro-inflammatory mediators (CML and CRP) and a lower adiponectin concentration.
Evidence has shown that women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a greater risk of cardiovascular complications compared with men, but this sex difference is not clearly understood. This study assessed the microvascular function and circulatory biomarkers in postmenopausal women (PMW) with T2DM compared with diabetic men and their non-diabetic counterparts. Sixty participants were divided into nondiabetic PMW, PMW with T2DM, non-diabetic men, and diabetic men. Microvascular function was assessed using non-invasive equipment (EndoPAT®) and reported as reactive hyperemia index (RHI). Anthropometric and cardiovascular parameters were also measured. Two-way ANOVA was performed using sex (women or men) and T2DM (non-diabetic and diabetic) as the two factors. RHI impairment (1.97±0.14) was detected in diabetic PMW compared with women without T2DM (2.5±0.13) accompanied by lower adiponectin levels (T2DM: 9.3±1.2 and CTL: 13.8±1.8 ug/mL, P<0.05). An increase in the Nε-carboxymethyllysine (CML), nitrate/nitrite, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were observed in diabetic PMW compared to the other groups. Although a poor glycemia control was seen in diabetic men, neither RHI nor circulatory biomarkers were affected by T2DM. Multiple linear regression stratified by sex and T2DM identified some variables with RHI only in PMW with T2DM: HbA1c (P=0.003), body mass index (P=0.029), CML (P=0.032), and CRP (P=0.006). Diabetic PMW were more susceptible to the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia than men, showing microvascular dysfunction with high levels of pro-inflammatory mediators (CML and CRP) and a lower adiponectin concentration.
Cardiovascular complications are common events in patients with type 2 diabetes
mellitus (T2DM) with high morbidity and mortality, with a 2- to 3-fold increased
risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and peripheral artery disease compared with
nondiabetic individuals (1). It has been
shown that women with T2DM are at greater risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) than
men by 4-5-fold (2-
4). Nevertheless, this positive interaction
between T2DM and CVD in women is not conclusive. Women with diabetes have a 44%
higher risk of myocardial infarction compared to men with diabetes (5-
7), whereas other studies showed that rates
of a coronary artery disease event were similar among women and men with T2DM (8), and elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
had a similar adverse effect on myocardial infarction in women and men (9). Therefore, studies that evaluate vascular
function associated with diabetes biomarkers may clarify sex differences and help
the health care system consider this issue and pay special attention to diabetic
women in the prevention of cardiovascular complications.Another issue related to sex differences in the diabetic status is to identify which
risk factor(s) is/are more likely to be associated with CVD in women with T2DM
compared with men. Previous studies have shown that women are more sensitive to risk
factors for CVD than men, such as body mass index (BMI), abdominal circumference,
total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol
(10,11). Additionally, evidence has pointed out the importance of pro- and
anti-inflammatory mediators, sex hormones, and endothelial dysfunction on CVD in
diabetic women (12). Given that women are
more susceptible to CVD after menopause regardless of preexisting conditions (13), assessment of circulatory biomarkers
associated with microvascular function in postmenopausal women with T2DM could
contribute to prevention strategies for women's cardiovascular health. In addition,
women live longer than men, making prevention (primary or secondary) a priority in
women's health care, since healthy aging is essential for maintaining functional
ability and being economically active in old age (14).Therefore, this study aimed at: 1) assessing whether T2DM affects microvascular
function equally in postmenopausal women and men at a similar age compared with
their nondiabetic counterparts; and 2) investigating circulatory biomarkers directly
related to: a) T2DM (glycemia, HbA1c, Nε-carboxymethyllysine (CML), and advanced
glycation end products (AGEs)); b) CVD (nitrate/nitrite, C-reactive protein (CRP),
and lipid profile); and c) pro- and anti-inflammatory adipokines, tumor necrosis
factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and adiponectin.
Material and Methods
Participants
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Campinas
(UNICAMP-CAAE: 53104516.3.0000.5404) following the principles outlined in the
Declaration of Helsinki and the STROBE cross-sectional reporting guidelines
(15). The participants were divided
into four groups: nondiabetic postmenopausal women (control, n=16),
postmenopausal women with T2DM (n=15), nondiabetic men (control, n=15), and men
with T2DM (n=14). The postmenopausal period was determined as the absence of
menstruation for at least one year due to natural or surgical causes. T2DM was
determined based on a previous medical diagnosis. The inclusion criteria were
that women and men be physically inactive and a similar time after menopause for
women. The exclusion criteria were smokers, taking hormone replacement, history
of cardiovascular events, autoimmune diseases, renal dysfunction, and insulin
therapy. According to these criteria, 125 participants were enrolled between
June 2016 and November 2018, but only sixty were eligible for the study. Before
starting the protocol, the participants were informed about the procedures and
risks of the study and signed a consent form in accordance with UNICAMP's Ethics
Committee.
Study design
All groups underwent the same procedures (between 7:00 and 10:00 a.m.), following
a predetermined order. In the first appointment, the medical records were
assessed and the medication inventory, anthropometric parameters, resting heart
rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and
microvascular function were measured. In the second appointment (scheduled
within 7 days after the first appointment), blood samples were collected after a
12-h fast, with participants being instructed to avoid physical activities, not
to take vitamins, supplements, and caffeine and, if possible, avoid using
certain medications such as β-blockers, nitrates, calcium channel blockers,
anti-inflammatories, and aspirin at least 24 h before the evaluations.
Anthropometric and cardiovascular measurements
Body weight and height were measured, BMI was calculated, and the waist
circumference (WC) was taken as described previously (16). After 20 min of seated rest, three consecutive BP
measurements were taken using semiautomatic equipment with oscillometric devices
calibrated periodically (Microlife, MIB-P3BTOA, Brazil). Resting BP was
determined as the average of three measurements. The resting BP values were
included in the information about participants required by the
EndoPAT® software before starting the microvascular function
test. Hypertensive participants were classified according to previous medical
diagnoses.
Microvascular function test
Microvascular function was performed in a quiet and temperature-controlled
(24-27°C) room and obtained using non-invasive equipment (EndoPAT 2000, Itamar
Medical Inc., Israel) as previously described (17). This technique evaluates beat-by-beat plethysmographic
measurements of pulse wave amplitude in the fingers through probes. Briefly, the
protocol included a 10-min baseline record, followed by 5-min inflation of a
blood pressure cuff around the non-dominant arm (tested arm) with a pressure of
60 mmHg above resting SBP. Finally, a 5-min signal was recorded after deflation
of the cuff, representing hyperemic response. Blood pressure cuff occlusion was
not applied to the contralateral arm (control arm). The primary output of the
EndoPAT examination is the reactive hyperemia index (RHI), representing the
microvascular function. RHI is automatically calculated through a computer
algorithm by normalizing the baseline signal and indexing the ratio on the test
arm to that of the control arm, following the equation: [(tested arm-post
occlusion / tested arm-baseline) / (control arm-post occlusion / control
arm-baseline)] × baseline correction factor. As a secondary output of this
device, the mean resting HR was also evaluated concomitantly during the baseline
period.
Biochemical analyses
Blood samples were centrifuged at 1,000 g for 15 min at room
temperature, and the plasma and serum were stored at -80°C for biochemical
analyses. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glycemia, serum lipid profile, estradiol,
and creatinine were determined using an automated standard method (Fleury
Laboratory, Brazil). Plasma adiponectin (Millipore, USA, catalogue number:
EZHADP-61K), serum C-reactive protein (Cayman Chemical, USA, catalogue number:
10011236), plasma nitrate/nitrite (NOx-) (Cayman Chemical, catalogue
number: 780001), serum Nε-carboxymethyllysine (Cell Biolabs, USA, catalogue
number: STA-816), and serum tumor necrosis factor α (Millipore, catalogue
number: HCYTOMAG-60K) were measured using a commercial kit according to
manufacturers’ instructions. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined
according to the equation (18):
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as means±SE. The normality and homogeneity of the data were
verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests, respectively. The variables
that did not present a normal distribution were standardized using a z-score.
Two-way ANOVA was performed using sex (women or men) and T2DM (non-diabetic and
diabetic) as the two factors followed by Bonferroni's post hoc
test for comparing the differences between groups. A multiple linear regression
model was performed: 1) the RHI was established as the dependent variable and
sex and T2DM as the independent variables. Secondary analyses were stratified by
sex and T2DM; 2) the RHI was established as the dependent variable and the
HbA1c, BMI, CML, adiponectin, and CRP levels as the independent variables (IBM
SPSS 23.0, SPSS Inc., USA). The power of the study was 95% for all analyzed
groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All figures were
constructed using GraphPad Software (Prism 5, USA).
Results
Higher WC, BMI, and GFR values were found in women with T2DM while total cholesterol,
LDL-C, and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C concentrations were lower compared
with non-diabetic women (P<0.05). A lower level in LDL-C concentration was found
in men with T2DM compared with non-diabetic men (P<0.05). No differences were
observed in HDL-C and triglycerides levels in all groups (Table 1). The concentration of creatinine and systolic and
diastolic blood pressure values were higher in both diabetic and non-diabetic men
compared to their respective women's counterpart group (P<0.05), even though the
values were within a normal range. Table 1
summarizes the data.
Table 1
Characteristics of the study participants.
Women
Men
Control (n=16)
T2DM (n=15)
Control (n=15)
T2DM (n=14)
Age (years)
56.7±0.8
57.7±1.0
54.2±1.3
55.8±1.6
BMI (kg/m2)
27.2±0.8
30.7±0.8*
29.1±1.2
29.8±1.0
WC (cm)
92.0±2.5
101.9±2.2*
100.5±2.4†
105.4±2.7
Postmenopausal time (y)
8.1±1.4
9.0±1.1
-
-
Estradiol (ng/mL)
0.88±0.17
0.66±0.08
-
-
Fasting insulin (mU/L)
9.5±0.6
14.6±3.3
13.3±0.8
17.4±3.9
Creatinine (mg/dL)
0.71±0.03
0.72±0.04
1.02±0.04†
1.04±0.12‡
GFR (mL/min)
94.5±3.7
113.9±6.2*
100.3±5.1
110.5±8.6
SBP (mmHg)
115.8±2.8
121.4±2.7
123.8±4.1
130.7±2.8‡
DBP (mmHg)
73.8±2.3
76.5±2.1
81.6±1.9†
82.9±1.8‡
Rest heart rate (bpm)
65.1±1.9
64.9±1.9
66.0±3.1
65.0±2.4
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
214.9±8.8
186.2±6.0*
191.5±7.3†
174.4±7.6
LDL-C (mg/dL)
133.9±6.6
104.9±6.0*
118.7±7.0
96.4±7.1#
HDL-C (mg/dL)
51.7±4.0
53.2±2.9
44.9±2.0
46.5±3.6
Non-HDL (mg/mL)
163.2±8.6
133.0±6.3*
146.5±7.7
125.9±9.4
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
162.5±19.0
154.7±15.1
153.1±18.3
191.1±39.7
BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; GFR: glomerular filtration
rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure;
LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density
lipoprotein cholesterol. Data are reported as means±SE. *P<0.05
vs control women; #P<0.05
vs control men; †P<0.05
vs control women; ‡P<0.05
vs type-2 diabetes (T2DM) women (two-way
ANOVA).
BMI: body mass index; WC: waist circumference; GFR: glomerular filtration
rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure;
LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C: high-density
lipoprotein cholesterol. Data are reported as means±SE. *P<0.05
vs control women; #P<0.05
vs control men; †P<0.05
vs control women; ‡P<0.05
vs type-2 diabetes (T2DM) women (two-way
ANOVA).All the participants with T2DM were on oral hypoglycemic medication. Regarding oral
antidiabetic medication, most of the women with T2DM were taking biguanides (86%),
followed by sulphonylureas (40%), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4, 34%),
sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2, 13.4%), and thiazolidinedione (TZD, 7%).
Similarly, biguanides were the major class of oral antidiabetic treatment in men
with T2DM (86%), followed by sulphonylureas (50%) and DPP-4 inhibitors (21%).
Approximately 54 and 64% of women and men with T2DM were hypertensive,
respectively.
Circulatory biomarkers and microvascular function
To examine the circulatory biomarkers in T2DM groups and to detect the
differences between the sexes, we evaluated biomarkers directly related to this
disorder and their associations with microvascular function. As expected,
participants with T2DM presented higher glycemia (43 and 85% for women and men,
respectively) and HbA1c values (28 and 40% for women and men, respectively)
compared to their nondiabetic counterparts (Figure 1A and B). A striking sex difference was found between the
two diabetic groups regarding glycemia, with a worse glycemic control in men,
approximately 32% (P<0.05) (Figure 1A).
Surprisingly, women with T2DM had significant impairment in vascular function
(P<0.05) measured indirectly by RHI, approximately 21% (control: 2.51±0.13
vs T2DM: 1.97±0.14), while diabetes did not affect RHI in
men (control: 2.05±0.08 and T2DM: 2.00±0.13) (Figure 1C). Another difference between the sexes was found when
comparing RHI in the control groups; healthy women had a greater RHI (2.51±0.13)
compared to men (2.00±0.13), approximately 19%, (P<0.05) (Figure 1C).
Figure 1
Microvascular function and glycemic profile of groups. Groups:
non-diabetic postmenopausal women (control women), postmenopausal women
with type-2 diabetes (T2DM women), non-diabetic men (control men), and
men with T2DM (T2DM men). A, Glycemia; B,
Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c); C, Reactive hyperemia
index (RHI, a.u. arbitrary unit). Data are reported as means±SE.
*#‡P<0.05 (two-way ANOVA).
Figure 2 shows the circulatory anti- and
pro-inflammatory mediators in all studied groups. The presence of T2DM
significantly affected the concentration of adiponectin in postmenopausal women,
about 32% of reduction (control: 13.8±1.8 and T2DM women: 9.3±1.2 ug/mL,
P<0.05), whereas this anti-inflammatory adipokine was not altered in men
(control men: 6.2±0.6 vs T2DM men: 5.4±0.7 ug/mL, P>0.05).
As expected, a sex difference was observed in adiponectin level both in
nondiabetic and diabetic groups (Figure
2A).
Figure 2
Circulatory biomarkers. Groups: nondiabetic postmenopausal women
(control women), postmenopausal women with type-2 diabetes (T2DM women),
non-diabetic men (control men), and men with T2DM (T2DM men).
A, Adiponectin; B, Nε-carboxymethyllysine
(CML); C, C-reactive protein (CRP); D,
Nitrate/nitrite; E, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).
Data are reported as means±SE. *‡P<0.05 (two-way
ANOVA).
The concentrations of CML were markedly higher in postmenopausal women with T2DM
(P<0.05), approximately 156% compared with their non-diabetic counterparts
(Figure 2B). Additionally, CRP levels
were markedly higher (56%) in women with T2DM compared with diabetic men (Figure 2C). Overall, diabetic status did not
affect the levels of these pro-inflammatory mediators in men (Figure 2B and C). Confirming the sex
difference in the susceptibility of the pro-inflammatory response, the
NOx- levels were also increased in diabetic postmenopausal women,
approximately 46% (Figure 2D). The TNF-α
levels were not different between the groups (Figure 2E).The multiple linear regression model identified the independent variables for
RHI: sex (P=0.009) and T2DM (P=0.018), data not shown. In addition, the multiple
linear regression stratified by sex and T2DM identified some variables with RHI
only in women with T2DM: HbA1c (P=0.003), BMI (P=0.029), CML (P=0.032), and CRP
(P=0.006) (Table 2).
Table 2
Multiple linear regression for reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and
related variables.
Variables
Control
T2DM
Coefficients
95%CI
P-value
Coefficients
95%CI
P-value
Women
HbA1c
0.523±0.730
-1.160 to 2.206
0.494
-0.332±0.075
-0.510 to -0.154
0.003
BMI
-0.017±0.057
-0.149 to 0.115
0.770
-0.085±0.031
-0.159 to -0.012
0.029
CML
0.101±0.249
-0.473 to 0.674
0.697
0.031±0.012
0.004 to 0.059
0.032
Adiponectin
-0.001±0.022
-0.051 to 0.049
0.957
0.020±0.026
-0.041 to 0.082
0.460
CRP
-0.032±0.040
0.123 to 0.059
0.439
0.054±0.014
0.021 to 0.087
0.006
Intercept
-0.179±3.821
-8.992 to 8.633
0.964
5.974±1.030
3.539 to 8.409
0.001
Men
HbA1c
0.143±0.300
-0.536 to -0.822
0.646
-0.091±0.080
-0.280 to 0.098
0.291
BMI
0.006±0.021
-0.041 to 0.052
0.793
0.127±0.089
-0.084 to 0.338
0.198
CML
0.016±0.040
-0.075 to 0.108
0.700
-0.044±0.026
-0.106 to 0.017
0.133
Adiponectin
-0.015±0.045
-0.117 to 0.087
0.748
0.062±0.064
-0.088 to 0.213
0.360
CRP
0.021±0.021
-0.068 to 0.026
0.333
-0.034±0.029
-0.102 to 0.033
0.271
Intercept
1.157±1.890
-3.119 to 5.433
0.556
-1.039±2.610
-7.210 to 5.133
0.703
HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin A1c; BMI: body mass index; CML:
Nε-carboxymethyllysine; CRP: C-reactive protein.
HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin A1c; BMI: body mass index; CML:
Nε-carboxymethyllysine; CRP: C-reactive protein.
Discussion
The main finding of this study was that postmenopausal women with T2DM without
previous CVD events had impaired microvascular function that was accompanied by a
high plasma concentration of two pro-inflammatory mediators, CML and CRP, and a
lower level of anti-inflammatory adipokine, adiponectin, even though glycemia was
significantly lower compared to diabetic men at a similar age.It has been systematically shown that several pathways explain the cardiovascular
complications associated with T2DM in the general population (7,12,19), but no studies have examined the impact of
T2DM on microvascular function in postmenopausal women comparing them to nondiabetic
counterparts and males. In addition, anthropometric parameters, BP, GFR, and lipid
profile are considered important risk factors for cardiovascular complications for
both men and women with T2DM (10). WC was
significantly higher in diabetic women (10%) even though this anthropometric
parameter was above the normal values in the female groups, according to the WHO
guidelines (14). Indeed, it is well known
that women after menopause show a significant change in anthropometric parameters
because of sex hormone deficiencies (20).
Additionally, fat distribution and metabolic rate differ between men and women
throughout life, depending on genetics, the amount of skeletal muscle mass, and the
density of adrenergic receptor subtypes in fat depots (20). Given that GFR is considered a gold standard indicator of
renal function, we measured this parameter in all groups to exclude interfering
factors in the circulating biomarkers of interest. Although postmenopausal women
with T2DM showed higher values for GFR compared with their non-diabetic
counterparts, the values were still within normal range, so this parameter can be
excluded as a confounding factor (21).Previous studies have demonstrated a pathological link between obesity, lower
adiponectin level, and insulin resistance in both men and women (22-
24). Conversely, a study showed no
association between trunk fat and adiponectin level in middle-aged and older women
with or without diabetes (25). Accordingly,
we found no correlation between WC and the anti-inflammatory mediator, adiponectin,
in postmenopausal women with T2DM (P=0.16, data not shown). The multiple linear
regression indicated a statistical relationship between BMI and RHI in women with
T2DM, and a significant decrease in the concentration of adiponectin was detected in
diabetic women. Accordingly, a population-based cohort examining 2,400 men and women
reported that high adiponectin levels is associated with a lower incidence of T2DM,
and this association is stronger in women than in men (26). Adiponectin also plays an antiatherogenic role in
modulating macrophage to foam cell transformation preventing vascular damage during
the atherogenesis process (27). Taken
together, the lower concentration of adiponectin observed in postmenopausal diabetic
women may contribute to an impairment of vascular function in this population. It
should also be emphasized that the sex differences between the groups have already
been published by our group, where women had higher adiponectin levels compared to
men in a healthy population (28).Chronic inflammation, and subsequent oxidative stress, plays a key role in diabetic
status and its complications, which are characterized by a marked increase in
pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, and other
IL-1β dependent cytokines (19). Moreover, the
activation of the AGEs/RAGE/NFkB pathway is strongly associated with cardiovascular
complications in both types of DM (29-
31). The AGEs are a group of heterogeneous
substances, and CML is one of the most studied among them. Our findings clearly
showed that the pro-inflammatory mediators CRP and CML were markedly elevated in
postmenopausal women with T2DM compared with non-diabetic counterparts and diabetic
and non-diabetic men. It is intriguing that no differences were found in TNF-α
levels in all studied groups. Collectively, our findings showed that postmenopausal
women were more susceptible to diabetic status with significant alterations in pro-
and anti-inflammatory mediators that are accompanied by microvascular dysfunction
even though glycemia and HbA1c were lower than those in men. These results revealed
an important clinical characteristic; in addition to the classical glucose
regulation, the biomarkers AGEs, CRP, and adiponectin are good predictors of
vascular function in postmenopausal women. Accordingly, a previous study has shown
that the early detection of AGEs is an important prognostic factor for diabetic
nephropathies, and increased serum levels of CML in diabetic subjects indicated
ongoing glycemia damage and their susceptibility to developing renal complications
(19). Most studies involving AGEs and
vascular function have been carried out in experimental diabetes models (32) or isolated cells (33). Our study is the first to examine this important biomarker
directly involved in the CVD complication in diabetic postmenopausal women and the
differences between the sexes. Another point that should be addressed is the lack of
changes in vascular function in diabetic men, as well as the circulatory pro- and
anti-inflammatory biomarkers. An early study has demonstrated that CML is associated
with an increased risk of coronary heart disease in older populations, but they
examined women and men altogether, and 64.4% of the studied population were women
(34). Conversely, when men were studied
separately, there were no significant differences in the concentration of AGEs,
including CML, in older men with (n=455) or without diabetes (n=2,566) even though
the fasting glycemia was higher in patients with diabetes (35). Accordingly, our study clearly shows that the
concentration of CML is not affected by diabetes in men, but it is in women.Regarding the NOx- level, results were controversial. Data from our
laboratory showed that in experimental diabetes models that used male rats, a
significant reduction in nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability takes place (36), whereas this parameter showed great
variability in human studies, ranging from 10±0.9 up to 25±1.4 µM (16,35).
In the present study, we found an increase in NOx- level (46%) in
postmenopausal women with T2DM, indicating an overproduction of NO that could
reflect an inflammatory condition in this population. Accordingly, a meta-analysis
found that both T1DM and T2DM participants showed an increased level of
NOx- compared with the control group with up-regulation of inducible
NO synthase (iNOS) and a massive generation of NO in response to inflammation and
oxidative stress (37).A limitation of this study was the small number of participants. Nevertheless, our
study focused on a narrow age bracket since a significant disparity between the
early and late postmenopausal periods has been reported, affecting data integrity.
Thus, the narrowness of the inclusion/exclusion criteria was important to get a
homogenous population.
Conclusion
Our findings showed that vascular dysfunction was associated with two pathways,
lower production of the anti-inflammatory agent adiponectin and overproduction
of the pro-inflammatory mediators AGEs and CRP in diabetic postmenopausal women,
even though the classical biomarker for T2DM (glycemia) was lower than in men. A
graphical abstract illustrates this conclusion (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Graphical abstract showing that vascular dysfunction is associated
with lower production of adiponectin and overproduction of the
pro-inflammatory mediators advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and
C-reactive protein (CRP) in diabetic postmenopausal women, even though
glycemia was lower than in men.
Authors: Lydia S Lamb; Helman Alfonso; Paul E Norman; Timothy M E Davis; Josephine Forbes; Gerald Müench; Felix Irrgang; Osvaldo P Almeida; Jonathan Golledge; Graeme J Hankey; Leon Flicker; Bu B Yeap Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S G Wannamethee; O Papacosta; D A Lawlor; P H Whincup; G D Lowe; S Ebrahim; N Sattar Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2011-08-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Pedro R Zaros; Carla E M Romero Pires; Mauricio Bacci; Camila Moraes; Angelina Zanesco Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2009-06-19 Impact factor: 2.809