Bram B C Peters1, Pher G Andersson1,2, Somsak Ruchirawat3,4,5, Winai Ieawsuwan3,4. 1. Department of Organic Chemistry, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius väg 16C, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden. 2. School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban 4000, South Africa. 3. Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, Chulabhorn Research Institute, 54 Kamphaeng Phet 6 Road, Bangkok 10210, Thailand. 4. Center of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology (EHT), Office of the Permanent Secretary (OPS), Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI), Bangkok 10400, Thailand. 5. Program in Chemical Sciences, Chulabhorn Graduate Institute, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, 906 Kamphaeng Phet 6 Road, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.
Abstract
A highly efficient N,P-ligated iridium complex is presented for the simple preparation of chiral tetrahydro-3-benzazepine motifs by catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation. Substrates bearing both 1-aryl and 1-alkyl substituents were smoothly converted to the corresponding hydrogenated product with excellent enantioselectivity (91-99% ee) and in isolated yield (92-99%). The synthetic value of this transformation was demonstrated by a gram-scale hydrogenation and application in the syntheses of trepipam and fenoldopam.
A highly efficient N,P-ligated iridium complex is presented for the simple preparation of chiral tetrahydro-3-benzazepine motifs by catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation. Substrates bearing both 1-aryl and 1-alkyl substituents were smoothly converted to the corresponding hydrogenated product with excellent enantioselectivity (91-99% ee) and in isolated yield (92-99%). The synthetic value of this transformation was demonstrated by a gram-scale hydrogenation and application in the syntheses of trepipam and fenoldopam.
Benzazepines represent common
structural motifs in biologically active compounds. Widespread applications
have been found in drug molecules, and various substituted tetrahydro-3-benzazepines
have been evaluated pharmacologically in the past.[1] Among these, several 1-substituted tetrahydro-3-benzazepines
have tested positively as drug candidates against various diseases.
For example, fenoldopam shows blood-pressure-reducing abilities,[2] SCH-23390 is an excellent D1 receptor
antagonist,[3] and lorcaserin acts as an
antiobesity drug (Figure ).[4]
Representative chiral
1-substituted tetrahydro-3-benzazepine drugs.Numerous racemic syntheses of 1-substituted tetrahydro-3-benzazepines
have been developed, enabled mostly by intramolecular Friedel–Crafts-type
alkylation,[5] ring enlargement,[6] reductive cyclization,[7] or arylation.[8] Despite their importance,
fewer enantioselective methods have been developed to access enantioenriched
products. The reported asymmetric methodologies mainly rely on a chiral
pool approach,[9] auxiliary strategy,[10] or catalytic asymmetric synthesis.[11] However, the catalytic asymmetric approaches
that have been developed thus far do not focus on the synthesis of
benzazepine motifs but rather show a single application of the obtained
chiral products in the synthesis of a benzazepine. For example, the
elegant contributions of Wu,[11a] Riera,[11b] and Chen and Zhang[11c] can all yield chiral 1-substituted benzazepine motifs after several
transformations but have only been demonstrated once (Scheme a–c).
Scheme 1
Representative Catalytic
Approaches to Chiral 1-Substituted Tetrahydro-3-benzazepine
Motifs and This Work
Over the past decades,
asymmetric hydrogenation using hydrogen
gas has proven to be one of the most efficient methods for installing
chirality due to the high reactivity, enantioselectivity, and atom
economy.[12] The hydrogenation of cyclic
ene-carbamate precursors, which can be prepared by a pinacol–pinacolone
rearrangement, as outlined in Scheme ,[13] can potentially lead
to the facile synthesis of valuable chiral 3-benzapine structures.
Inspired by our previous success in the hydrogenation of cyclic motifs,[14] we were encouraged to elaborate a novel asymmetric
strategy for the preparation of chiral 3-benzazepines (Scheme d). In addition, the obtained
methodology was applied in the synthesis of biologically relevant
compounds.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of Cyclic Ene-carbamates
Initially, several structurally diverse chiral N,P-ligated
iridium
complexes were evaluated in the hydrogenation of model substrate 1a (Table , entries 1–4). To our delight, catalyst A was
shown to be very efficient and provided full and clean conversion
toward the desired product 2a with 99% ee when 1 mol % of catalyst was used in dichloromethane (DCM) under
100 bar of hydrogen atmosphere. Decreasing the catalyst loading or
the hydrogen pressure negatively affected the conversion, whereas
the high enantioselectivity was retained (entries 5 and 6).
Table 1
Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
entry
deviation from above
conv.
(%)
ee (%)
1
no
full
99 (S)
2
Cat. B instead of Cat. A
80
80 (S)
3
Cat. C instead of Cat. A
full
97 (R)
4
Cat. D instead of Cat. A
71
33 (R)
5
0.5 mol % Cat. 4A instead of 1 mol %
73
99 (S)
6
50 bar H2 instead
of 100 bar
94
99 (S)
Reactions were performed using 0.05
mmol 1a in 1 mL of DCM. Conversion was determined using 1H NMR spectroscopy. The enantiomeric excess was determined
by supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) analysis using Chiralcel
OJ-H chiral stationary phase. The stereochemistry was assigned by
a comparison of the optical rotation with reported values after the
reduction of 2a by LiAlH4.
Reactions were performed using 0.05
mmol 1a in 1 mL of DCM. Conversion was determined using 1H NMR spectroscopy. The enantiomeric excess was determined
by supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) analysis using Chiralcel
OJ-H chiral stationary phase. The stereochemistry was assigned by
a comparison of the optical rotation with reported values after the
reduction of 2a by LiAlH4.Having established an effective
catalytic system, we began to investigate
the generality of this iridium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation
of cyclic ene-carbamates (Scheme ). Starting with electron-rich dimethoxy-substituted
benzazepine motifs, both the model substrate 1a and different
para-substituted 1-aryl ene-carbamates (1b–1d) were hydrogenated with excellent enantioselectivity (96–99% ee) and in high isolated yield (>95%). Increasing the
number
of substituents did not give any change in stereoselectivity, and
both phenol- and methoxy-derived benzazepines 2e and 2f were obtained in 99% ee. Changing the
dimethoxy substituent pattern to a 1,3-benzodioxole motif was well
tolerated, giving 95 and 96% ee for the hydrogenation
of 1g and 1h, respectively. Decreasing the
electron density on the benzazepine motif to monomethoxy did not affect
the enantioselectity, and substrates 1i–1k were hydrogenated smoothly. Further decreasing the electronic
properties to a fluorine-substituted core motif slightly decreased
the enantioselectivity to 94% ee (2l); however, introducing a methoxy group to the para position of the
1-aryl substituent enhanced the stereochemical outcome to 96% ee (2m). The size of the carbamate group had
little effect on the reactivity or selectivity, and methyl-, ethyl-,
and benzyl-ene-carbamates 1n–1p were
all hydrogenated with excellent enantioselectivities of 96–99% ee. Changing the ring size had a minor effect, and the eight-membered
cyclic carbamate 2q was obtained with 95% ee. Unfortunately, the hydrogenation of N-methyl enamine 2r was found to inhibit the hydrogenation. The amine most
likely forms a strong chelate with the catalyst, preventing hydrogenation
from occurring. Alternatively, it might deprotonate the acidic iridium–dihydride
complex.[15]
Scheme 3
Asymmetric Hydrogenation
of Aryl-Substituted Ene-carbamates
Reaction conditions:
0.05 mmol
substrate, 1 mol % A, 1 mL of DCM, 100 bar H2, 16 h, rt. The stereochemistry was tentatively assigned by assuming
a similar hydrogenation pathway as that of 1a, the absolute
configuration of which was assigned by comparing the sign of the optical
rotation with the literature value after the reduction of 2a with LiAlH4. Isolated yields. Enantiomeric excess was
determined by SFC analysis using chiral stationary phases.
Asymmetric Hydrogenation
of Aryl-Substituted Ene-carbamates
Reaction conditions:
0.05 mmol
substrate, 1 mol % A, 1 mL of DCM, 100 bar H2, 16 h, rt. The stereochemistry was tentatively assigned by assuming
a similar hydrogenation pathway as that of 1a, the absolute
configuration of which was assigned by comparing the sign of the optical
rotation with the literature value after the reduction of 2a with LiAlH4. Isolated yields. Enantiomeric excess was
determined by SFC analysis using chiral stationary phases.We then further explored substrates having an alkyl
substituent
on the ene-carbamate to access 1-alkyl tetrahydro benzazepine scaffolds
(Scheme ).[16] The methyl-substituted ene-carbamate 3a was hydrogenated with 91% ee. Increasing the alkyl-chain
length to n-butyl enhanced the enantioselectivity
to 99% ee (4b). Both i-butyl- and i-propyl-substituted benzazepines were
obtained with slightly decreased enantioselectivities of 94 and 93% ee, respectively (4c and 4d).
On the contrary, the benzyl-substituted benzazepine 4e was accessed with an excellent enantioselectivity of 99% ee. Satisfactorily, all chiral alkyl-substituted benzazepines 4a–e could be isolated in high yields.
Scheme 4
Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Alkyl-Substituted Ene-carbamates
Reaction conditions: 0.05 mmol
substrate, 1 mol % A, 1 mL of DCM, 100 bar H2, 16 h, rt, unless stated otherwise. The stereochemistry was tentatively
assigned by assuming a similar hydrogenation pathway to 1a, the absolute configuration of which was assigned by comparing the
sign of the optical rotation with the literature value after the reduction
of 2a with LiAlH4. Isolated yields. Enantiomeric
excess was determined by SFC analysis using chiral stationary phases.
2 mol % A was
used.
Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Alkyl-Substituted Ene-carbamates
Reaction conditions: 0.05 mmol
substrate, 1 mol % A, 1 mL of DCM, 100 bar H2, 16 h, rt, unless stated otherwise. The stereochemistry was tentatively
assigned by assuming a similar hydrogenation pathway to 1a, the absolute configuration of which was assigned by comparing the
sign of the optical rotation with the literature value after the reduction
of 2a with LiAlH4. Isolated yields. Enantiomeric
excess was determined by SFC analysis using chiral stationary phases.2 mol % A was
used.To demonstrate the scalability of this
asymmetric protocol, we
carried out the gram-scale hydrogenation of ene-carbamate 1a with the same reactivity and selectivity, and the desired chiral
benzazepine 2a was obtained in 98% yield with 99% ee (Scheme a). Treating the obtained hydrogenated product 2a with
an excess of LiAlH4 in MeOH reduced the carbamate group
to methylamine to elaborate (S)-trepipam in 92% yield,
exemplifying the synthetic utility of this asymmetric hydrogenation
methodology. Further application was demonstrated by the synthesis
of blood-pressure-reducing agent (S)-fenoldopam (Scheme b). The hydrogenation
of 1s proceeded smoothly, giving the corresponding tetrahydro-3-benzazepine 2s with 99% ee. Subsequent hydrogenation
of the isolated product in the presence of Pd/C led to the cleavage
of the Cbz-group. Thereafter, 2t could be transformed
to (S)-fenoldopam, as previously described.[2b] To the best of our knowledge, no asymmetric
synthesis of fenoldopam was previously disclosed.[2b,17]
Scheme 5
Gram-Scale Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Applications
Because the absolute configuration of trepipam is reported,
we
were able to confirm the stereochemical outcome of the hydrogenation
by comparing the sign of optical rotation of our synthetic trepipam
with that reported. This confirmed the absolute configuration of product 2a to be the (S)-enantiomer. On the basis of computational
and experimental studies, a quadrant model has been developed to predict
the stereochemical outcome in the iridium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation
of olefins using bidentate N,P-ligands.[18] It is suggested that olefins preferentially coordinate trans to
phosphorus and that steric interactions between the ligand and the
olefin are the origin of the enantioselection (Figure a). As a consequence of the encumbered chiral
ligand around the iridium center, the coordinated olefin experiences
steric hindrance from either the lower or the upper left quadrant.
To minimize steric interactions, the smallest hydrogen substituent
of the olefin arranges itself to point toward the bulk of the ligand,
which in this case occupies the lower left quadrant iii. Thereby,
the coordinated enantiotopic face is locked. The quadrant model, where
the hydride is delivered from the bottom, then predicts the enantiomerical
outcome of the hydrogenation (Figure b). Because the absolute configuration of 2a was confirmed to be the (S)-enantiomer, we were able to validate
the developed quadrant model that indeed predicted the stereochemical
outcome for the hydrogenation of this class of cyclic ene-carbamates
correctly (Figure c).
Figure 2
Stereoselectivity model. (a) Coordination of oxazole ligand and
olefin to the iridium center. (b) Quadrant model based on the steric
influence of the ligand seen from the olefin. (c) Predicted and experimental
stereochemical outcomes for the hydrogenation of ene-carbamates.
Stereoselectivity model. (a) Coordination of oxazole ligand and
olefin to the iridium center. (b) Quadrant model based on the steric
influence of the ligand seen from the olefin. (c) Predicted and experimental
stereochemical outcomes for the hydrogenation of ene-carbamates.In summary, we herein described the straightforward
and operationally
simple synthesis of chiral 3-benzazepines by the iridium-catalyzed
asymmetric hydrogenation of cyclic ene-carbamates. A series of 1-aryl-
and 1-alkyl-substituted benzazepines were accessed with excellent
enantioselectivity (91–99% ee) and in high
isolated yield (92–99%). The methodology was shown to be scalable
to at least a gram scale. Furthermore, the synthetic utility was highlighted
in the enantioselective preparation of trepipam and fenoldopam.
Authors: Ivana Gazic Smilovic; Jerome Cluzeau; Frank Richter; Sven Nerdinger; Erwin Schreiner; Gerhard Laus; Herwig Schottenberger Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: J Weinstock; J W Wilson; D L Ladd; C K Brush; F R Pfeiffer; G Y Kuo; K G Holden; N C Yim; R A Hahn; J R Wardell; A J Tobia; P E Setler; H M Sarau; P T Ridley Journal: J Med Chem Date: 1980-09 Impact factor: 7.446