Literature DB >> 15786424

Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures.

S D Killeen1, M J O'Sullivan, J C Coffey, W O Kirwan, H P Redmond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncological procedures may have better outcomes if performed by high-volume providers.
METHODS: A review of the English language literature incorporating searches of the Medline, Embase and Cochrane collaboration databases was performed. Studies were included if they involved a patient cohort from 1984 onwards, were community or population based, and assessed health outcome as a dependent variable and volume as an independent variable. The studies were also scored quantifiably to assess generalizability with respect to any observed volume-outcome relationship and analysed according to organ system; numbers needed to treat were estimated where possible.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight relevant studies were identified and a total of 41 were included, of which 13 were based on clinical data. All showed either an inverse relationship, of variable magnitude, between provider volume and mortality, or no volume-outcome effect. All but two clinical reports revealed a statistically significant positive relationship between volume and outcome; none demonstrated the opposite.
CONCLUSION: High-volume providers have a significantly better outcome for complex cancer surgery, specifically for pancreatectomy, oesphagectomy, gastrectomy and rectal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15786424     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  41 in total

1.  Institutional patient accrual volume and the treatment quality of I‑125 prostate seed implantation in a Japanese nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katsumasa Nakamura; Saiji Ohga; Atsunori Yorozu; Shiro Saito; Takashi Kikuchi; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  The reporting of randomized clinical trials using a surgical intervention is in need of immediate improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabelle Jacquier; Isabelle Boutron; David Moher; Carine Roy; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Redefining quality of care.

Authors:  Erik K Mayer; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Asvin M Ganapathi; Xiaofei Wang; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The 61st Annual Scientific Meeting of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery Fukuoka, October 12-15, 2008. Editorial.

Authors:  Shinichi Takamoto; Hiroaki Miyata
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-12-11

6.  The surgeon and cancer management.

Authors:  Irving Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Appraising the quality of care in surgery.

Authors:  Erik K Mayer; Andre Chow; Justin A Vale; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Volume and outcome for major upper GI surgery in England.

Authors:  N Pal; B Axisa; S Yusof; R G Newcombe; S Wemyss-Holden; M Rhodes; M P N Lewis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Differences in hospital performance for noncancer vs cancer colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Zaid M Abdelsattar; Robert W Krell; Darrell A Campbell; Samantha Hendren; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Re-organisation of oesophago-gastric cancer care in England: progress and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Thomas R Palser; David A Cromwell; Richard H Hardwick; Stuart A Riley; Kimberley Greenaway; William Allum; Jan Hp van der Meulen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.