Hyung-Lok Chung1,2,3, Patrick Rump4, Di Lu1,2, Megan R Glassford5, Jung-Wan Mok1,2, Jawid Fatih1, Adily Basal6, Paul C Marcogliese1,2, Oguz Kanca1,2, Michele Rapp7, Johanna M Fock8, Erik-Jan Kamsteeg9, James R Lupski1,10,11, Austin Larson12, Mark C Haninbal5, Hugo Bellen1,2,3, Tamar Harel6,13. 1. Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 2. Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 4. University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Genetics, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands. 5. Division of Pediatric Genetics, Metabolism & Genomic Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. 6. Department of Genetics, Hadassah Medical Organization, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel. 7. University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 60045, USA. 8. University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Neurology, Groningen 9700 RB, The Netherlands. 9. Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands. 10. Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 11. Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 12. University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 60045, United States. 13. Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-membrane protein complex (EMC) is a multi-protein transmembrane complex composed of 10 subunits that functions as a membrane-protein chaperone. Variants in EMC1 lead to neurodevelopmental delay and cerebellar degeneration. Multiple families with biallelic variants have been published, yet to date, only a single report of a monoallelic variant has been described, and functional evidence is sparse. METHODS: Exome sequencing was used to investigate the genetic cause underlying severe developmental delay in three unrelated children. EMC1 variants were modeled in Drosophila, using loss-of-function (LoF) and overexpression studies. Glial-specific and neuronal-specific assays were used to determine whether the dysfunction was specific to one cell type. RESULTS: Exome sequencing identified de novo variants in EMC1 in three individuals affected by global developmental delay, hypotonia, seizures, visual impairment and cerebellar atrophy. All variants were located at Pro582 or Pro584. Drosophila studies indicated that imbalance of EMC1-either overexpression or knockdown-results in pupal lethality and suggest that the tested homologous variants are LoF alleles. In addition, glia-specific gene dosage, overexpression or knockdown, of EMC1 led to lethality, whereas neuron-specific alterations were tolerated. DISCUSSION: We establish de novo monoallelic EMC1 variants as causative of a neurological disease trait by providing functional evidence in a Drosophila model. The identified variants failed to rescue the lethality of a null allele. Variations in dosage of the wild-type EMC1, specifically in glia, lead to pupal lethality, which we hypothesize results from the altered stoichiometry of the multi-subunit protein complex EMC.
BACKGROUND: The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-membrane protein complex (EMC) is a multi-protein transmembrane complex composed of 10 subunits that functions as a membrane-protein chaperone. Variants in EMC1 lead to neurodevelopmental delay and cerebellar degeneration. Multiple families with biallelic variants have been published, yet to date, only a single report of a monoallelic variant has been described, and functional evidence is sparse. METHODS: Exome sequencing was used to investigate the genetic cause underlying severe developmental delay in three unrelated children. EMC1 variants were modeled in Drosophila, using loss-of-function (LoF) and overexpression studies. Glial-specific and neuronal-specific assays were used to determine whether the dysfunction was specific to one cell type. RESULTS: Exome sequencing identified de novo variants in EMC1 in three individuals affected by global developmental delay, hypotonia, seizures, visual impairment and cerebellar atrophy. All variants were located at Pro582 or Pro584. Drosophila studies indicated that imbalance of EMC1-either overexpression or knockdown-results in pupal lethality and suggest that the tested homologous variants are LoF alleles. In addition, glia-specific gene dosage, overexpression or knockdown, of EMC1 led to lethality, whereas neuron-specific alterations were tolerated. DISCUSSION: We establish de novo monoallelic EMC1 variants as causative of a neurological disease trait by providing functional evidence in a Drosophila model. The identified variants failed to rescue the lethality of a null allele. Variations in dosage of the wild-type EMC1, specifically in glia, lead to pupal lethality, which we hypothesize results from the altered stoichiometry of the multi-subunit protein complex EMC.
Authors: N Wu; X Ming; J Xiao; Z Wu; X Chen; M Shinawi; Y Shen; G Yu; J Liu; H Xie; Z S Gucev; S Liu; N Yang; H Al-Kateb; J Chen; J Zhang; N Hauser; T Zhang; V Tasic; P Liu; X Su; X Pan; C Liu; L Wang; J Shen; J Shen; Y Chen; T Zhang; J Zhang; K W Choy; J Wang; Q Wang; S Li; W Zhou; J Guo; Y Wang; C Zhang; Hong Zhao; Yu An; Yu Zhao; J Wang; Z Liu; Y Zuo; Y Tian; X Weng; V R Sutton; H Wang; Y Ming; S Kulkarni; T P Zhong; P F Giampietro; S L Dunwoodie; S W Cheung; X Zhang; L Jin; J R Lupski; G Qiu; F Zhang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-01-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ye Zhang; Steven A Sloan; Laura E Clarke; Christine Caneda; Colton A Plaza; Paul D Blumenthal; Hannes Vogel; Gary K Steinberg; Michael S B Edwards; Gordon Li; John A Duncan; Samuel H Cheshier; Lawrence M Shuer; Edward F Chang; Gerald A Grant; Melanie G Hayden Gephart; Ben A Barres Journal: Neuron Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Tamar Harel; Gozde Yesil; Yavuz Bayram; Zeynep Coban-Akdemir; Wu-Lin Charng; Ender Karaca; Ali Al Asmari; Mohammad K Eldomery; Jill V Hunter; Shalini N Jhangiani; Jill A Rosenfeld; Davut Pehlivan; Ayman W El-Hattab; Mohammed A Saleh; Charles A LeDuc; Donna Muzny; Eric Boerwinkle; Richard A Gibbs; Wendy K Chung; Yaping Yang; John W Belmont; James R Lupski Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Rachel Straussberg; Hind Ahmed; Christian Beetz; Lihadh Al-Gazali; Wafaa Eyaid; Christopher A Walsh; Diane D Shao; Amjad Khan; Songhai Tian; R Sean Hill; Richard S Smith; Amar J Majmundar; Najim Ameziane; Jennifer E Neil; Edward Yang; Amal Al Tenaiji; Saumya S Jamuar; Thorsten M Schlaeger; Muna Al-Saffar; Iris Hovel; Aisha Al-Shamsi; Lina Basel-Salmon; Achiya Z Amir; Lariza M Rento; Jiin Ying Lim; Indra Ganesan; Shirlee Shril; Gilad Evrony; A James Barkovich; Peter Bauer; Friedhelm Hildebrandt; Min Dong; Guntram Borck Journal: Genet Med Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Martin C Jonikas; Sean R Collins; Vladimir Denic; Eugene Oh; Erin M Quan; Volker Schmid; Jimena Weibezahn; Blanche Schwappach; Peter Walter; Jonathan S Weissman; Maya Schuldiner Journal: Science Date: 2009-03-27 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sheng Chih Jin; Jason Homsy; Samir Zaidi; Qiongshi Lu; Sarah Morton; Steven R DePalma; Xue Zeng; Hongjian Qi; Weni Chang; Michael C Sierant; Wei-Chien Hung; Shozeb Haider; Junhui Zhang; James Knight; Robert D Bjornson; Christopher Castaldi; Irina R Tikhonoa; Kaya Bilguvar; Shrikant M Mane; Stephan J Sanders; Seema Mital; Mark W Russell; J William Gaynor; John Deanfield; Alessandro Giardini; George A Porter; Deepak Srivastava; Cecelia W Lo; Yufeng Shen; W Scott Watkins; Mark Yandell; H Joseph Yost; Martin Tristani-Firouzi; Jane W Newburger; Amy E Roberts; Richard Kim; Hongyu Zhao; Jonathan R Kaltman; Elizabeth Goldmuntz; Wendy K Chung; Jonathan G Seidman; Bruce D Gelb; Christine E Seidman; Richard P Lifton; Martina Brueckner Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 38.330