BACKGROUND: Congenital scoliosis is a common type of vertebral malformation. Genetic susceptibility has been implicated in congenital scoliosis. METHODS: We evaluated 161 Han Chinese persons with sporadic congenital scoliosis, 166 Han Chinese controls, and 2 pedigrees, family members of which had a 16p11.2 deletion, using comparative genomic hybridization, quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction analysis, and DNA sequencing. We carried out tests of replication using an additional series of 76 Han Chinese persons with congenital scoliosis and a multicenter series of 42 persons with 16p11.2 deletions. RESULTS: We identified a total of 17 heterozygous TBX6 null mutations in the 161 persons with sporadic congenital scoliosis (11%); we did not observe any null mutations in TBX6 in 166 controls (P<3.8×10(-6)). These null alleles include copy-number variants (12 instances of a 16p11.2 deletion affecting TBX6) and single-nucleotide variants (1 nonsense and 4 frame-shift mutations). However, the discordant intrafamilial phenotypes of 16p11.2 deletion carriers suggest that heterozygous TBX6 null mutation is insufficient to cause congenital scoliosis. We went on to identify a common TBX6 haplotype as the second risk allele in all 17 carriers of TBX6 null mutations (P<1.1×10(-6)). Replication studies involving additional persons with congenital scoliosis who carried a deletion affecting TBX6 confirmed this compound inheritance model. In vitro functional assays suggested that the risk haplotype is a hypomorphic allele. Hemivertebrae are characteristic of TBX6-associated congenital scoliosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compound inheritance of a rare null mutation and a hypomorphic allele of TBX6 accounted for up to 11% of congenital scoliosis cases in the series that we analyzed. (Funded by the National Basic Research Program of China and others.).
BACKGROUND:Congenital scoliosis is a common type of vertebral malformation. Genetic susceptibility has been implicated in congenital scoliosis. METHODS: We evaluated 161 Han Chinese persons with sporadic congenital scoliosis, 166 Han Chinese controls, and 2 pedigrees, family members of which had a 16p11.2 deletion, using comparative genomic hybridization, quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction analysis, and DNA sequencing. We carried out tests of replication using an additional series of 76 Han Chinese persons with congenital scoliosis and a multicenter series of 42 persons with 16p11.2 deletions. RESULTS: We identified a total of 17 heterozygous TBX6 null mutations in the 161 persons with sporadic congenital scoliosis (11%); we did not observe any null mutations in TBX6 in 166 controls (P<3.8×10(-6)). These null alleles include copy-number variants (12 instances of a 16p11.2 deletion affecting TBX6) and single-nucleotide variants (1 nonsense and 4 frame-shift mutations). However, the discordant intrafamilial phenotypes of 16p11.2 deletion carriers suggest that heterozygous TBX6 null mutation is insufficient to cause congenital scoliosis. We went on to identify a common TBX6 haplotype as the second risk allele in all 17 carriers of TBX6 null mutations (P<1.1×10(-6)). Replication studies involving additional persons with congenital scoliosis who carried a deletion affecting TBX6 confirmed this compound inheritance model. In vitro functional assays suggested that the risk haplotype is a hypomorphic allele. Hemivertebrae are characteristic of TBX6-associated congenital scoliosis. CONCLUSIONS: Compound inheritance of a rare null mutation and a hypomorphic allele of TBX6 accounted for up to 11% of congenital scoliosis cases in the series that we analyzed. (Funded by the National Basic Research Program of China and others.).
Authors: Duncan B Sparrow; Gavin Chapman; Allanceson J Smith; Muhammad Z Mattar; Joelene A Major; Victoria C O'Reilly; Yumiko Saga; Elaine H Zackai; John P Dormans; Benjamin A Alman; Lesley McGregor; Ryoichiro Kageyama; Kenro Kusumi; Sally L Dunwoodie Journal: Cell Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Bridget A Fernandez; Wendy Roberts; Brian Chung; Rosanna Weksberg; Stephen Meyn; Peter Szatmari; Ann M Joseph-George; Sara Mackay; Kathy Whitten; Barbara Noble; Cathy Vardy; Victoria Crosbie; Sandra Luscombe; Eva Tucker; Lesley Turner; Christian R Marshall; Stephen W Scherer Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Santhosh Girirajan; Jill A Rosenfeld; Bradley P Coe; Sumit Parikh; Neil Friedman; Amy Goldstein; Robyn A Filipink; Juliann S McConnell; Brad Angle; Wendy S Meschino; Marjan M Nezarati; Alexander Asamoah; Kelly E Jackson; Gordon C Gowans; Judith A Martin; Erin P Carmany; David W Stockton; Rhonda E Schnur; Lynette S Penney; Donna M Martin; Salmo Raskin; Kathleen Leppig; Heidi Thiese; Rosemarie Smith; Erika Aberg; Dmitriy M Niyazov; Luis F Escobar; Dima El-Khechen; Kisha D Johnson; Robert R Lebel; Kiana Siefkas; Susie Ball; Natasha Shur; Marianne McGuire; Campbell K Brasington; J Edward Spence; Laura S Martin; Carol Clericuzio; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Evan E Eichler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jill A Rosenfeld; Justine Coppinger; Bassem A Bejjani; Santhosh Girirajan; Evan E Eichler; Lisa G Shaffer; Blake C Ballif Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean Journal: Nature Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Brianna Peskin; Katrin Henke; Nicolás Cumplido; Stephen Treaster; Matthew P Harris; Michel Bagnat; Gloria Arratia Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Brooke Sadler; Gabe Haller; Lilian Antunes; Xavier Bledsoe; Jose Morcuende; Philip Giampietro; Cathleen Raggio; Nancy Miller; Yared Kidane; Carol A Wise; Ina Amarillo; Nephi Walton; Mark Seeley; Darren Johnson; Conner Jenkins; Troy Jenkins; Matthew Oetjens; R Spencer Tong; Todd E Druley; Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Jessica X Chong; Kati J Buckingham; Shalini N Jhangiani; Corinne Boehm; Nara Sobreira; Joshua D Smith; Tanya M Harrell; Margaret J McMillin; Wojciech Wiszniewski; Tomasz Gambin; Zeynep H Coban Akdemir; Kimberly Doheny; Alan F Scott; Dimitri Avramopoulos; Aravinda Chakravarti; Julie Hoover-Fong; Debra Mathews; P Dane Witmer; Hua Ling; Kurt Hetrick; Lee Watkins; Karynne E Patterson; Frederic Reinier; Elizabeth Blue; Donna Muzny; Martin Kircher; Kaya Bilguvar; Francesc López-Giráldez; V Reid Sutton; Holly K Tabor; Suzanne M Leal; Murat Gunel; Shrikant Mane; Richard A Gibbs; Eric Boerwinkle; Ada Hamosh; Jay Shendure; James R Lupski; Richard P Lifton; David Valle; Deborah A Nickerson; Michael J Bamshad Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Charles E Mackel; Ajit Jada; Amer F Samdani; James H Stephen; James T Bennett; Ali A Baaj; Steven W Hwang Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: James R Lupski; Pengfei Liu; Pawel Stankiewicz; Claudia M B Carvalho; Jennifer E Posey Journal: Expert Rev Mol Diagn Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 5.225