Abbas Ahmadi Vasmehjani1, Farhad Rezaei2, Mohammad Farahmand1, Talat Mokhtari-Azad1, Mohammad Reza Yaghoobi-Ershadi3, Mohsen Keshavarz4, Hamid Reza Baseri3, Morteza Zaim3, Mahmood Iranpour5, Habibollah Turki6, Mohammad Esmaeilpour-Bandboni7. 1. Department of Virology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14156446, Iran. 2. Department of Virology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14156446, Iran. Electronic address: rezaie@tums.ac.ir. 3. Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 14156446, Iran. 4. The Persian Gulf Tropical Medicine Research Center, The Persian Gulf Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, 7514763448, Iran. 5. Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada. 6. Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, 7919693116, Iran. 7. School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, 4188794755, Iran.
Dear Editor,Arthropod-borne viruses are a group of the most important emerging pathogens. They cause a range of diseases in vertebrate hosts and threaten human health (Gan and Leo, 2014). The global distribution of arboviruses is associated with the vector which is strongly affected by changes in environmental conditions. Dengue virus (DENV) and Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), which cause high annual infected cases and have an increasing geographic distribution, are transmitted by Aedes spp. mosquitoes, in particular Ae. albopictus and Ae. Aegypti (Presti et al., 2014; Higuera and Ramírez, 2018). Although, the main vector of dengue virus, Ae. aegypti, was not detected in Iran, other possible important vectors such as Ae. Albopictus and Ae. unilineatus were recorded (Doosti et al., 2016; Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al., 2017). West Nile virus (WNV), a member of the genus Flaviviruses, is one of the most widespread arboviruses (Chancey et al., 2015). The epidemiological evidence of WNV in different hosts in Iran was found (Bagheri et al., 2015), and the circulation of WNV in the main vector, Culex pipiens s.l. and Cx. pipiens, has been proved (Shahhosseini et al., 2017). Due to limited information on the situation of CHIKV, DENV and WNV in Iran, we performed a wide geographical investigation to determine the prevalence of IgG specific antibodies in human samples as well as the genome of WNV, CHIKV and DENV in mosquitoes.From September 2017 to June 2018, a total of 1257 serum samples were collected in six provinces (south area: Bushehr, Hormozgan, Sistan & Baluchestan, Khuzestan; north area: Gilan, Mazandaran) (Fig. 1). Patients with previous history of occasional fever, headache, body ache, arthralgia or rash illness and age over 15 years were included. Euroimmune ELISA kits were used to detect the IgG antibodies against WNV, DENV and CHIKV (Andayi et al., 2014). Adult female mosquitoes and larvae (10,488 adult mosquitoes and larvae) were collected from 190 pools in the above six provinces between March 2017 to March 2018 using light traps (Fig. 1). Morphological identification of mosquitoes was carried out using the keys of Becker et al. (Schaffner et al., 2001; Becker, 2010). RNA was extracted and Altona Real-time PCR kits were used to detect and amplify the genome of WNV, DENV and CHIKV (see Supplementary Material for detailed methods). All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Logistic regression analysis using single and multiple univariate analysis was used to determine the relationship between the variables and seroreactivity of WNV, DENV and CHIKV.
Fig. 1
The map of the sampling regions in this cross-sectional study. The sampling areas are highlighted in grey.
The map of the sampling regions in this cross-sectional study. The sampling areas are highlighted in grey.The demographic characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 1. Results showed that 236 (18.8%) and 74 (5.9%) serum samples were reactive for WNV and DENV IgG antibodies, whereas IgG antibodies against CHIKV (22, 1.8%) were lower than WNV and DENV. According to the univariate analysis, WNV seroprevalence were significantly associated with age (45–54 vs. 1–24, OR = 1.77, 95% C.I.: 1.03–3.02, P < 0.05; ≥55 vs. 1–24, OR = 1.93, 95% C.I.: 1.15–3.26, P < 0.05), and residential areas (Gilan vs. Bushehr; OR = 0.39, 95% C.I.: 0.12–0.71, P < 0.001). Also, DENV and CHIKV seroprevalences were significantly associated with residential areas (Hormozgan vs. Bushehr; DENV, OR = 0.09, 95% C.I.: 0.018–0.95, P < 0.05; CHIKV, OR = 8.5, 95% C.I.: 2.287–33.01, P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S1).
Table 1
Study populations' demographic characteristics and WNV, DENV and CHIKV IgG seroprevalence.
Characteristic
Total Count
Percent (%)
Age (years) (n = 1257)
1–24
203
16.2
25–34
399
31.7
35–44
263
20.9
45–54
187
14.9
≥55
205
16.3
Gender (n = 1207)
Female
734
60.8
Male
473
39.2
Residential area (n = 1257)
Bushehr
414
32.9
Hormozgan
153
12.2
Sistan & Baluchestan
230
18.3
Gilan
165
13.1
Mazandaran
95
7.6
Khuzestan
200
15.9
Travelling history (n = 980)
Yes
230
23.5
No
750
76.5
Seroprevalence (n = 1257)
West Nile virus (WNV)
236
18.8
Dengue virus (DENV)
74
5.9
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV)
22
1.8
Coinfection (n = 1257)
WNV + DENV
67
5.3
WNV + CHIK
14
1.1
DENV + CHIK
4
0.3
DENV + WNV + CHIK
4
0.3
Study populations' demographic characteristics and WNV, DENV and CHIKV IgG seroprevalence.Multiple univariate analysis showed significant association between WNV seroreactivity and age (45–54 vs. 1–24, OR = 1.82, 95% C.I.: 1.8–1.02, P < 0.05; ≥55 vs. 1–24, OR = 3.52, 95% C.I.: 1.98–6.26, P < 0.01). The association was also found between WNV seroreactivity and residential areas (Gilan and Khuzestan vs. Bushehr; OR = 0.25, 95% C.I.: 0.121–0.52, P < 0.001 and OR = 1.57, 95% C.I.: 1.01–2.45, P < 0.05). Also, DENV and CHIKV seroprevalences were significantly associated with residential areas (Hormozgan vs. Bushehr; OR = 0.12, 95% C.I.: 0.18–0.95 and OR: 9.0, 95% C.I.: 2.21–36. 6, P < 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2
Multiple univariate analysis for the assessment of factors associated with these arboviruses seropositivity.
West Nile virus
Characteristic
Negative cases (N)
Positive cases (N)
Seropositivity (%)
OR
95%CI
Adjusted P-value
Age (years)
1–24
176
27
13.3
Ref
25–34
325
74
18.5
1.35
0.82
2.21
0.22
35–44
215
48
18.25
1.45
0.82
2.42
0.152
45–54
147
40
21.4
1.82
1.8
1.02
0.04
≥55
158
47
22.9
3.52
1.98
6.26
0.00
Gender
Female
590
144
19.6
Ref
Male
387
86
18.2
0.732
0.497
1.04
0.53
Residential area
Bushehr
330
84
20.3
Ref
Hormozgan
118
35
22.9
1.29
0.8
2.07
0.29
Sistan & Baluchestan
189
41
17.8
0.85
0.56
1.28
0.44
Gilan
150
15
9.1
0.25
0.121
0.52
0.000
Mazandaran
83
12
12.6
0.56
0.29
1.06
0.08
Khuzestan
151
49
24.5
1.57
1.00
2.45
0.04
Dengue virus
Age (years)
1–24
194
9
4.4
Ref
25–34
385
14
3.5
0.63
0.26
1.5
0.3
35–44
243
20
7.6
1.15
0.49
2.7
0.73
45–54
177
10
5.3
0.65
0.24
1.7
0.4
≥55
184
21
10.2
2.19
0.92
5.19
0.07
Gender
Female
700
34
4.6
Ref
Male
435
38
8.0
1.17
0.67
2.03
0.56
Residential area
Bushehr
388
26
6.3
Ref
Hormozgan
152
1
0.7
0.12
0.18
0.95
0.04
Sistan & Baluchestan
220
10
4.3
0.71
0.32
1.55
0.4
Gilan
154
11
6.7
0.77
0.32
1.8
0.54
Mazandaran
90
5
5.3
0.91
0.31
2.45
0.84
Khuzestan
179
21
10.5
1.9
0.95
3.7
0.057
Chikungunya virus
Age (years)
1–24
202
1
0.5
Ref
25–34
388
11
3.0
5.4
0.68
43.2
0.1
35–44
261
2
0.8
2.07
0.18
23.7
0.55
45–54
183
4
2.1
5.7
0.54
60.3
0.14
≥55
201
4
2.0
4.9
0.44
53.7
0.18
Gender
Female
720
14
1.9
Ref
Male
466
7
1.5
1.05
0.37
3.02
0.91
Residential area
Bushehr
411
3
0.7
Ref
Hormozgan
144
9
5.9
9.0
2.21
36.6
0.001
Sistan & Baluchestan
228
2
0.9
1.3
0.21
8.15
0.77
Gilan
160
5
3.0
4.2
0.8
22.86
0.08
Mazandaran
94
1
1.1
1.4
0.14
13.89
0.74
Khuzestan
198
2
1.0
1.25
0.19
8.1
0.8
Notes: Ref, the group was set as reference.
Multiple univariate analysis for the assessment of factors associated with these arboviruses seropositivity.Notes: Ref, the group was set as reference.The mosquitoes collected in this study belonged to 4 genera and 23 species, including 13 Culex, 8 Aedes, 1 Culiseta and 1 Uranotaenia genera (Supplementary Table S2). In Sistan and Baluchestan Province, the highest detection frequency species of mosquito larvae and adults were Cx. quinquefasciatus (44%) and Ae. vexans (78%). The species of mosquito larvae with highest detection frequency in other regions were: Cs. Longiareolata in Hormozgan, Cx. pipiens complex in Khuzestan, Gilan and Bushehr. Ae. Albopictus species was only detected in Sistan and Baluchestan Province, but Ae. Caspius and Cx. pipiens complex were detected in all of the provinces. All species were screened for the presence of WNV, CHIKV and DENV, but RNA of three arboviruses were not detected.In our study, there were two groups of cases: the ones who had not travelled to dengue-endemic areas and those who had travelled to east of Asia, Saudi Arabia. That was in parallel with previous studies in Iran (Chinikar et al., 2013; Aghaie et al., 2014). The previous study reported that there was no evidence of DENV seroprevalence in Iran before 2000 (Saidi, 1974), but positive cases in this decade have been reported (Aghaie et al., 2014; Heydari et al., 2018; Tavakoli et al., 2020). Our results showed a number of DENV seropositve cases from southern regions, Khuzestan and Bushehr. Those regions are in close proximity to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, and thousands of Iranian travel there as pilgrims annually, which may increase the probability of DNEV infection. In our report, DNEV seroprevalence was not correlated with patients who had any travel history. It is possible that these cases might be infected through contact with imported cases. Another plausible explanation is that the seropositivity of these cases might be caused by infected vectors. Pakistan country, which is near Sistan and Baluchestan province of Iran, has the largest number of confirmed cases among countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) during all DENV outbreaks (Chinikar et al., 2013; Humphrey et al., 2016). And our report has shown the potential for the presence of DENV vector, Ae. albopictus and Ae. unilineatus, in Iran (Doosti et al., 2016; Yaghoobi-Ershadi et al., 2017).An earlier report showed that the prevalence of WNV in humans in West Azerbaijan and Khuzestan was 0% (Saidi et al., 1976). However, several studies have shown the prevalence of WNV in humans and in mosquitoes (Culex and Aedes) in recent years (Chinikar et al., 2012; Shahhosseini et al., 2017). In the studies reported in 2010 and 2016, the prevalence of WNV in Khuzestan and Sistan and Baluchestan provinces were 5% and 17.96%, respectively (Sharifi et al., 2010; Aghaie et al., 2016). In a recent study, the seroprevalence of WNV in Khuzestan Province is 23.8% (Kalantari et al., 2019). Another study in the northwest of Iran showed the presence of WNV RNA in Ae. Caspius, a vector of WNV (Bagheri et al., 2015). Also, the evidence of WNV infection in mosquitos, such as Cx. pipienss.l, was found in Gilan, Mazandaran, Golestan and East Azerbaijan (Eybpoosh et al., 2019). Despite the evidence for existence and circulation of WNV, no clinical cases have been described in Iran until now. Our data showed that WNV IgG was positive in patients, but WNV RNA was not detected in vectors.As the first study of Iran, our results showed that CHIKV seroprevalence was about 1.8% for humans, but there was no RNA detected in mosquitoes, which demonstrated that individuals might have likely been only exposed to CHIKV. Serologic evidence of CHIKV transmission has been identified in the countries surrounding the Red Sea, such as Pakistan (Ali and Dasti, 2018) and Saudi Arabia (Hussain et al., 2013). Also, a newly CHIKV imported case from Sistan and Baluchistan Province of Iran was reported (Pouriayevali et al., 2019). In this report, the patient had a recent travel history to Pakistan, where a widespread epidemic of the disease was ongoing at the time of the study.In recent study, age showed independently association with WNV and CHIKV seropositivity, and a significant association of WNV seroreactivity with the increase of age was found (Mease et al., 2011; Ang et al., 2017; Shaibi et al., 2017; Humphrey et al., 2019). The observed rate was higher in the people with 45 or older compared to those who are below 45, which may be related to a higher probability of exposure to WNV among older people in life period. These findings are consistent with another study (Gómez-Dantés and Willoquet, 2009). A significant relationship was found between the residential area and WNV/CHIKV seroreactivity. People residing in Gilan Province had the lowest seroprevalence of WNV, but Gilan and Hormozgan had the highest seroprevalence of CHIKV antibodies compared with other regions. This is in agreement with the studies elsewhere (Ang et al., 2017; Vongpunsawad et al., 2017).In conclusion, our results revealed the seroprevalence of WNV, CHIKV and DENV in human population in Iran and no proof of viral RNAs was presence in vectors. Gilan and Hormozgan areas were high risk regions and the elderly persons were at higher risk of getting infected by WNV and CHIKV. These results help us to better understand the epidemiology of the infection and the ecology of the vectors in Iran. Therefore, considering the risk factors identified by this study, we recommend that the prevention and control strategies should be designed in the country.
Footnotes
The authors thank all colleagues for the help in the study design. This research received a specific grant from (Grand No. 940947). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The informed consent have been obtained from all participants and the studies have been approved by the National Institute for Medical Research Development ethics committee (IR.NIMAD.REC.1394.940947).
Data availability
All the data generated during the current study are included in the manuscript.
Authors: Luke E Mease; Rodney L Coldren; Lillian A Musila; Trish Prosser; Fredrick Ogolla; Victor O Ofula; Randal J Schoepp; Cindy A Rossi; Nicholas Adungo Journal: Virol J Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 4.099
Authors: John M Humphrey; Natalie B Cleton; Chantal B E M Reusken; Marshall J Glesby; Marion P G Koopmans; Laith J Abu-Raddad Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2016-12-07
Authors: Li Wei Ang; Yiu Wing Kam; Cui Lin; Prabha Unny Krishnan; Joanne Tay; Lee Ching Ng; Lyn James; Vernon J M Lee; Kee Tai Goh; Lisa F P Ng; Raymond T P Lin Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2017-12-27