Literature DB >> 3523457

Ceftazidime vs. standard therapy for pediatric meningitis: therapeutic, pharmacologic and epidemiologic observations.

W J Rodriguez, J R Puig, W N Khan, J Feris, B G Gold, C Sturla.   

Abstract

One hundred patients ages 1 month to 15 years received either ceftazidime (CZ) at a dose of 150 mg/kg/day divided every 8 hours or conventional treatment with chloramphenicol and ampicillin (CA). Seventy-eight had isolates recovered from the cerebrospinal fluid: 40 (51%) were Haemophilus influenzae (all ampicillin-susceptible); 16 (21%) were Streptococcus pneumoniae; 14 (18%) were Neisseria meningitidis; 3 (4%) were salmonellae; 1 (2%) was Pseudomonas; and 1 (2%) was Group B Streptococcus. Six patients with negative cerebrospinal fluid culture had positive latex agglutination (two H. influenzae, three N. meningitidis, one S. pneumoniae). Sixty-one patients had positive blood cultures. CZ inhibited 100% of H. influenzae at 0.78 micrograms/ml, S. pneumoniae at 0.39, N. meningitidis at 0.04 and salmonellae at 0.39 micrograms/ml. The mean peak serum concentration of CZ was 36.4 micrograms/ml with a mean cerebrospinal fluid level of 7.4 micrograms/ml. If one eliminates from the statistics those patients who died less than or equal to 24 hours after admission, five (10%) of 49 patients treated with CZ died, one (2%) improved and 43 (88%) were cured. Overall 29 patients died, 12 receiving CZ (20%) and 8 receiving CA (21%). There were no significant CZ-related toxicities. Gross neurologic sequelae were noted in 5% of 38 CZ patients and 4% of 28 CA patients. CZ compared favorably to CA for treatment of meningitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3523457     DOI: 10.1097/00006454-198607000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis        ISSN: 0277-9730


  12 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic choices for meningitis beyond the neonatal period.

Authors:  N J Klein; R S Heyderman; M Levin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  K Prasad; A Kumar; P K Gupta; T Singhal
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

3.  Bacterial meningitis in India: an IJP survey.

Authors:  S K Kabra; P Kumar; I C Verma; D Mukherjee; B H Chowdhary; S Sengupta; R N Singh; S P Khatua; N Miglani; K M Sehai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 4.  Pre-admission antibiotics for suspected cases of meningococcal disease.

Authors:  Thambu D Sudarsanam; Priscilla Rupali; Prathap Tharyan; Ooriapadickal Cherian Abraham; Kurien Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-14

5.  Cefotaxime versus chloramphenicol for ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae meningitis. A retrospective study of 62 cases.

Authors:  J R Lapointe; L Chicoine
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Disk diffusion interpretive criteria for extended-spectrum cephalosporins with Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; L A Maher; J S Redding
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae type b to ampicillin-sulbactam.

Authors:  P H Azimi; M G Dunphy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Concentrations of ceftazidime, tobramycin and ampicillin in the cerebrospinal fluid of newborn infants.

Authors:  I Tessin; B Trollfors; K Thiringer; Z Thörn; P Larsson
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 9.  Antibiotic resistance in Haemophilus influenzae: mechanisms, clinical importance and consequences for therapy.

Authors:  R de Groot; G Dzoljic-Danilovic; B van Klingeren; W H Goessens; H J Neyens
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Chloramphenicol or ceftriaxone, or both, as treatment for meningitis in developing countries?

Authors:  T Duke; A Michael; D Mokela; T Wal; J Reeder
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.