Chengxi Li1, Alex J Callahan1, Kruttika S Phadke2, Bryan Bellaire2, Charlotte E Farquhar1, Genwei Zhang1, Carly K Schissel1, Alexander J Mijalis1, Nina Hartrampf1, Andrei Loas1, David E Verhoeven2, Bradley L Pentelute1,3,4,5. 1. Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 2. Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 United States. 3. The Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 500 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States. 4. Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 5. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States.
Abstract
Antisense peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) have yet to translate to the clinic because of poor cellular uptake, limited solubility, and rapid elimination. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) covalently attached to PNAs may facilitate clinical development by improving uptake into cells. We report an efficient technology that utilizes a fully automated fast-flow instrument to manufacture CPP-conjugated PNAs (PPNAs) in a single shot. The machine is rapid, with each amide bond being formed in 10 s. Anti-IVS2-654 PPNA synthesized with this instrument presented threefold activity compared to transfected PNA in a splice-correction assay. We demonstrated the utility of this approach by chemically synthesizing eight anti-SARS-CoV-2 PPNAs in 1 day. A PPNA targeting the 5' untranslated region of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA reduced the viral titer by over 95% in a live virus infection assay (IC50 = 0.8 μM). Our technology can deliver PPNA candidates to further investigate their potential as antiviral agents.
Antisense peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) have yet to translate to the clinic because of poor cellular uptake, limited solubility, and rapid elimination. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) covalently attached to PNAs may facilitate clinical development by improving uptake into cells. We report an efficient technology that utilizes a fully automated fast-flow instrument to manufacture CPP-conjugated PNAs (PPNAs) in a single shot. The machine is rapid, with each amide bond being formed in 10 s. Anti-IVS2-654 PPNA synthesized with this instrument presented threefold activity compared to transfected PNA in a splice-correction assay. We demonstrated the utility of this approach by chemically synthesizing eight anti-SARS-CoV-2 PPNAs in 1 day. A PPNA targeting the 5' untranslated region of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA reduced the viral titer by over 95% in a live virus infection assay (IC50 = 0.8 μM). Our technology can deliver PPNA candidates to further investigate their potential as antiviral agents.
Antisense
oligonucleotide (ASO)-based therapeutic development is
gathering momentum following the recent FDA approval of the drugs
Eteplirsen,[1] Golodirsen,[2] Casimersen,[3] Viltepso[4] (based on phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer,
PMO), and Spinraza[5] (based on 2′-O-methoxyethyl-phosphorothioate). Next-generation technology
for enhanced ASO tissue penetration using cell-penetrating peptides
conjugated to PMO (PPMO) is under development at Sarepta Therapeutics,
with promising clinical outcomes.[6] As a
charge-neutral ASO class, peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) are also under
development.[7,8]PNAs are artificial single-stranded
DNA-like molecules in which
the sugar-phosphodiester moiety is replaced with an uncharged N-(2-aminoethyl) glycine unit, and the nucleobases are attached
via a methyl carbonyl linker.[7,8] Due to the attenuated
electrostatic repulsion in PNA-DNA/RNA duplexes, PNAs can hybridize
complementary DNA and RNA with higher affinity and specificity than
DNA–DNA/RNA duplexes.[9] Additionally,
the amide-based PNA backbone offers unique physicochemical properties
including superior chemical, thermal, and enzymatic stability.[10]PNAs have found a wide range of chemical
and biological applications.[11−13] PNAs are currently being developed
as antisense agents for diseases
including cancer,[14] monogenic blood disorders,[15] novel antibiotics,[13,16] and antivirals,[17,18] but to date have yet to become
a drug. PNAs can be limited by low solubility, poor intracellular
delivery, and renal clearance.[19] Despite
these limitations, some PNAs display promising biological activity.[11−13] Specifically, longer PNA sequences (>15-mer) can be endowed with
higher affinity and lower off-target toxicities.[20]The covalent attachment of a cell-penetrating peptide
(CPP) to
a PNA can help to overcome some of the development challenges.[19] CPP conjugation can improve the PNA solubility,
but it also reduces its physiological clearance rate by promoting
cellular internalization.[19,21] Despite the utility
of CPP–PNA conjugates, they can be toxic to cells and animals[22] and often require systematic structure–function
studies to optimize delivery while minimizing toxicity.[23]Existing standard batch protocols afford
efficient access to PNA
sequences with fewer than 15 bases while longer sequences remain challenging
to synthesize[20] (Figure a). PNA synthesis can be limited by on-resin
aggregation and side-reactions including deletion, rearrangement,
isomerization, and nucleobase addition, resulting in low yield of
the desired product.[20] Efforts to improve
the synthetic efficiency include capping and double-couplings, yet
these approaches still fail to produce long PNA sequences robustly.
Figure 1
Automated
single-shot technology can rapidly produce on-demand
customized PPNA sequences that inhibit SARS-CoV-2. (a) Typical coupling,
deprotection, and capping procedures during PNA assembly in the solid
phase. (b) Antisense PPNA binding to the 5′ UTR of the SARS-CoV-2
genomic transcript can prevent the expression of viral genes and subsequently
inhibit viral growth. (c) Workflow for the manual stepwise synthesis
of PPNAs with click chemistry. (d) Automated fast-flow synthesizer
allows for rapid manufacture of PPNAs in a single-shot. Fmoc: 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl.
HATU: O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium
hexafluorophosphate. DIEA: N,N-diisopropylethylamine.
Ac2O: acetic anhydride. Bhoc: benzhydryloxycarbonyl.
Automated
single-shot technology can rapidly produce on-demand
customized PPNA sequences that inhibit SARS-CoV-2. (a) Typical coupling,
deprotection, and capping procedures during PNA assembly in the solid
phase. (b) Antisense PPNA binding to the 5′ UTR of the SARS-CoV-2
genomic transcript can prevent the expression of viral genes and subsequently
inhibit viral growth. (c) Workflow for the manual stepwise synthesis
of PPNAs with click chemistry. (d) Automated fast-flow synthesizer
allows for rapid manufacture of PPNAs in a single-shot. Fmoc: 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl.
HATU: O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium
hexafluorophosphate. DIEA: N,N-diisopropylethylamine.
Ac2O: acetic anhydride. Bhoc: benzhydryloxycarbonyl.As the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19),
the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)[24] is a pathogen of immense importance to global
public health. Developing innovative direct-acting antiviral agents
is needed to eliminate this virus. PNAs have been investigated and
demonstrated efficacy against SARS-CoV in vitro.[17] Given the high sequence similarity between SARS-CoV-2
and SARS-CoV,[25] antisense PNAs provide
a promising avenue to achieve SARS-CoV-2 inhibition through a mechanism
of reducing the targeted RNA expression via sequence-specific steric
blocking (Figure b).In order to find the most effective sequence for a given indication,
investigation of multiple PNA candidates in a high-throughput manner
is required. To remove the obstacles for the rapid production of these
target-specific libraries of PNA strands, we developed a highly efficient
technology in which chemistry is matched with an automated fast-flow
instrument. This fully automated platform increases the PNA synthesis
rate by nearly an order of magnitude relative to commercial state-of-the-art
instruments with improved crude purity. The new flow synthesis protocol
described here only requires 10 s for each amide bond formation between
PNA monomers, a significant improvement over commercial microwave
peptide synthesizers[26] (10 min/amide bond
at 45 °C) or the DNA synthesizer Expedite 8909[27] (32 min/coupling cycle with capping at room temperature).
Further, with flow-based synthesis, no capping or double couplings
are needed. A variable temperature design increases coupling efficiency,
while reducing on-resin aggregation and other side-reactions.Instead of using a stepwise synthesis approach[28] via click chemistry[29] (Figure c), the high coupling
efficiency achieved with our flow technology allows direct manufacture
of long (>15-mer) PNA conjugates with cell-penetrating peptides
in
a single-shot (Figure d). This production strategy is convenient for simultaneous investigation
of the bioactivity, toxicity, and cell uptake of multiple PNAs in
view of establishing structure–function relationships.To demonstrate the reliability and applicability of our method,
we synthesized an 18-mer PPNA which hybridizes to the β-thalassemia
gene sequence, IVS2–654,[30] for splice-correction
that was covalently attached to a 12-mer CPP. The enhanced green fluorescence
protein (EGFP) assay[30] showed that the
single-shot synthesized PPNA presented threefold activity compared
to transfected PNA. The utility of this automated technology was further
demonstrated by the synthesis of eight PPNAs targeting SARS-CoV-2
genomic RNA in a single day. One of the designed PPNAs targeting the
5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) reduced the viral titers
by over 95% in a live infection assay.
Results and Discussion
Automated
Microscale Flow Synthesizer Design
The automated
flow PNA synthesizer consists of seven modules including a central
control computer, solution storage system, three HPLC pumps, three
multiposition valves, heating elements, reaction zone, and a UV–vis
detector. A modular script in the Mechwolf programming environment[31] controls the instrument (Figure a). During a coupling reaction, three HPLC
pumps draw reagents stored under nitrogen atmosphere from the storage
module, and the desired PNA monomer, activator, and base solutions
are merged using a valve. The mixture flows through a module electrically
heated at 70 °C, forming an activated ester. The activated PNA
monomer flows next through the reaction zone, a packed bed of resin
maintained at 70 °C, where amide bond formation is completed
within 10 s. During the deprotection step, the piperidine solution
flows through a room temperature loop controlled by a multiposition
valve (Figure a) and
meets with the 70 °C reactor to generate a ∼40 °C
environment, which enables rapid and efficient deprotection with minimized
nucleobase adducts. An in-line UV–vis detector was used to
monitor the composition of the spent reagent solution (Figure b). The deprotection efficiency
and the mass transfer rate through the resin can be inferred through
the Fmoc-removal absorbance chromatogram.[32] This modular and in-line detection design allows for chemistry optimization
not only for PNAs but also for other biopolymer syntheses.
Figure 2
Automated flow
PNA synthesis enables 10 s amide bond formation
and complete solid-phase synthesis cycles in 3 min. (a) Photographs
of the automated flow solid-phase synthesizer: full image, variant
temperature valve, and reusable reactors. (b) Process flow diagram.
Amino acids, activating agents, and DIEA are mixed by three HPLC pumps.
Two multiposition valves control the selection of the amino acids
and activating agents. The third valve controls variant temperature
flow paths. Amino acids are activated in the 70 °C loop, then
flowed over the resin bed housed in a reusable reactor. The effluent
is passed through a UV–vis spectrometer to waste. (c) Diagram
of the synthesis cycle showing the duration of each step, the solution
composition during each step after mixing, and the time used at each
step. HBTU: O-(benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate; DMF: N,N-dimethylformamide.
Automated flow
PNA synthesis enables 10 s amide bond formation
and complete solid-phase synthesis cycles in 3 min. (a) Photographs
of the automated flow solid-phase synthesizer: full image, variant
temperature valve, and reusable reactors. (b) Process flow diagram.
Amino acids, activating agents, and DIEA are mixed by three HPLC pumps.
Two multiposition valves control the selection of the amino acids
and activating agents. The third valve controls variant temperature
flow paths. Amino acids are activated in the 70 °C loop, then
flowed over the resin bed housed in a reusable reactor. The effluent
is passed through a UV–vis spectrometer to waste. (c) Diagram
of the synthesis cycle showing the duration of each step, the solution
composition during each step after mixing, and the time used at each
step. HBTU: O-(benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate; DMF: N,N-dimethylformamide.The reusable reactor body (Figure a) is designed for a 7.5 μmol scale synthesis
and is typically loaded with 15 mg of 0.5 mmol/g Rink Amide resin.
While reducing expensive monomer consumption and overall cost, this
design can deliver milligrams of pure product, which is often sufficient
for subsequent biological characterization. A detailed workflow and
timeline for a synthesis process is listed in Figure c, which presents the amide bond formation
step and the overall solid-phase PNA synthesis cycle within 3 min.
Additional details can be found in the Supporting Information, sections 3 to 7.
Optimization of Automated
PNA Synthesis
In-line UV–vis
monitoring combined with liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
(LC-MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) product
characterization allows for rapid optimization of PNA synthesis conditions.
We began the optimization with a manually synthesized 4-mer PNA in
∼4 h[20,33] with 57% crude purity (Table , entry 1). The off-target
products contained ∼15% isomers, ∼4% deletions, and
∼2% nucleobase adducts (see SI section
6). Next, the same PNA sequence was synthesized on the automated flow
synthesizer in 15 min at 70 °C (Table , entry 2). High temperature accelerated
both on-target (70%) and off-target reactions, especially nucleobase
adducts (7%) and deletions (10%). Further base screening, including
piperazine and morpholine, revealed that piperidine was optimal for
the Fmoc-deprotection at 70 °C (Table , entries 3–4).
Table 1
Evaluation of Reaction Conditions
for the Automated Flow PNA Synthesisa
PNA sequence: ACTG-Gly-CONH2. Conditions: manual synthesis: 100 mg Rink Amide resin (0.18
mmol/g), 6 equiv PNA monomer, 5.8 equiv PyAOP, 6 equiv DIEA, and 6
equiv 2,5-lutidine in DMF. Automated flow synthesis: 15 mg Rink Amide
resin (0.5 mmol/g), 10 equiv PNA monomer, 9.6 equiv activator, and
30 equiv DIEA in DMF, flow rate: 2.5 mL/min. See SI for details. The crude purity
was determined by HPLC UV absorbance at 280 nm. Total deletions of A, C, T, G, and Gly were summed. PyAOP:
(7-Azabenzotriazol-1-yloxy)trispyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate.
PNA sequence: ACTG-Gly-CONH2. Conditions: manual synthesis: 100 mg Rink Amide resin (0.18
mmol/g), 6 equiv PNA monomer, 5.8 equiv PyAOP, 6 equiv DIEA, and 6
equiv 2,5-lutidine in DMF. Automated flow synthesis: 15 mg Rink Amide
resin (0.5 mmol/g), 10 equiv PNA monomer, 9.6 equiv activator, and
30 equiv DIEA in DMF, flow rate: 2.5 mL/min. See SI for details. The crude purity
was determined by HPLC UV absorbance at 280 nm. Total deletions of A, C, T, G, and Gly were summed. PyAOP:
(7-Azabenzotriazol-1-yloxy)trispyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate.A major focus of the high-temperature
optimization was the prevention
of piperidine adduct formation during the deprotection steps. Addition
of formic acid to the deprotection solutions to prevent base-mediated
aspartimide formation is a common practice,[34] but we found that the lower basicity is also useful in preventing
nucleobase adduct formation. Formic acid (1% solution in 20% piperidine-DMF,
v/v) was therefore used as an additive for deprotection and successfully
decreased the base–adduct ratio to 3% (Table , entry 5). Higher formic acid concentration
can further inhibit the formation of base adducts but results in additional
impurities (Table , entry 6). The most effective strategy, however, was to decrease
the deprotection temperature to 40 °C, which was controlled by
a multiposition valve and a “T” connector (Figure a). Under this condition,
only negligible nucleobase adducts (<1%) were generated (Table , entry 7).Higher coupling temperatures (80 °C and 90 °C) for synthesis
were tested, and increased amounts of impurities (16% and 28%, respectively)
were found, indicating the synthesis temperature of 70 °C on
this flow instrument is optimal (Table , entries 8–9). A significant increase in purity
(81%) was achieved by using HATU as an activator, but 5% isomerization
was still observed (Table , entry 10). Finally, after replacing HATU with HBTU, we found
that the condition of entry 11 in Table yielded 90% pure PNA with <1% isomers
and <1% nucleobase adducts. The entry 11 conditions therefore were
used in all subsequent PNA syntheses.
Automated Single-Shot Synthesis
of PPNA
The optimized
flow recipe provides PNA sequences with significantly improved purity
to manual protocols in a fraction of the time. As depicted in Figure , using batch protocols,
production of a 4-mer PNA was completed in 4 h. In comparison, our
flow protocol provided the same sequence in 15 min with superior purity
(90% vs 57% for batch synthesis), as demonstrated by both HPLC and
LC-MS chromatograms (Figure a–d). To further test the synthetic efficiency of this
methodology, an 18-mer PNA with a three-lysine (K3) linker,[35] which hybridizes to the β-thalassemia
gene sequence (IVS2–654), was prepared in about 1 h with 60%
crude purity. We purified 4 mg of pure PNA with >95% purity for
downstream
biological characterizations (Figure e,f).
Figure 3
Automated fast-flow synthesis of PNAs and PPNAs with enhanced
purity
over manual protocols. (a–d) Crude HPLC/LC-MS traces of manually
and flow-synthesized 4-mer PNA. (e,f) Crude/pure HPLC, pure LC-MS
traces of flow synthesized anti-IVS2-654 PNA. (g,h) Crude/pure HPLC,
pure LC-MS traces of a single-shot synthesized anti-IVS2-654 PPNA.
Automated fast-flow synthesis of PNAs and PPNAs with enhanced
purity
over manual protocols. (a–d) Crude HPLC/LC-MS traces of manually
and flow-synthesized 4-mer PNA. (e,f) Crude/pure HPLC, pure LC-MS
traces of flow synthesized anti-IVS2-654 PNA. (g,h) Crude/pure HPLC,
pure LC-MS traces of a single-shot synthesized anti-IVS2-654 PPNA.This efficient protocol allows for single-shot
synthesis of PPNAs.
Conjugating cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) with PNAs through click
chemistry is a strategy for PNA intracellular delivery.[36,37] However, this method can be time-consuming (Figure c) and might require multiple purifications,
thereby reducing yields. To streamline preparation, we established
a single-shot strategy to produce PPNAs using our automated platform.
A 12-mer CPP, RXRRBRRXRRBR-CONH2 (Bpep, X =
6-aminohexanoic acid; B = β-alanine)[38] was presynthesized onto the resin on a peptide synthesizer developed
previously in our laboratory,[39] and the
Bpep-loaded resin was transferred directly on the microscale instrument
for PPNA synthesis. In this way, an anti-IVS2-654 PPNA was synthesized
in 1.7 h with 52% crude purity and 1.2 mg of pure material (>95%
purity)
were obtained after purification (Figure g,h). This automated protocol not only achieved
rapid production but also enabled an efficient synthesis of PPNA sequences
that might be difficult to synthesize with batch.
Synthetic anti-IVS2-654
PPNA Shows Enhanced Activity in an EGFP
Assay
The bioactivity of synthesized PPNAs was demonstrated
by an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) assay in HeLa-654
cells.[30] In this assay, the HeLa cells
are stably engineered with an EGFP-coding sequence interrupted by
an intron from the human β-globin gene (IVS2-654). The intron
contains a cryptic splice site that leads to retention of a β-globin
fragment in the EGFP mRNA sequence, resulting in the translation of
a nonfluorescent protein. The anti-IVS2-654 PNA hybridizes to the
aberrant β-globin 5′ splice site, forcing the splicing
machinery to use the normal splice sites and producing a functional,
fluorescent EGFP. The PNA activity in the nucleus is therefore correlated
with EGFP fluorescence and can be analyzed using flow cytometry, reported
here as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) relative to cells treated
with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as vehicle. We used the synthesis
platform for rapid production of an 18-mer anti-IVS2-654 PNA, a scramble
18-mer PNA (negative control), and an anti-IVS2-654 PPNA at milligram
scale with >95% purity.A commercial anti-IVS2-654 PNA was
obtained
from PNA Bio as a positive control (Figure a). As depicted in Figure b, the synthesized PNA and commercial PNA,
with delivery mediated by lipofectamine, presented similar activity
in the EGFP assay, validating the function of the flow-produced material.
The fluorescence, however, did not increase when cells were treated
with the scramble PNA, indicating sequence-dependent activity (Figure b). Importantly,
the single-shot synthesized PPNA improved the activity compared to
both unmodified PNA (16-fold) and transfected PNA (3-fold) at 10 μM
(Figure c). This result
highlights the importance of cell-penetrating peptides and demonstrates
the potential to quickly build an active PPNA library for further
applications.
Figure 4
Automated flow-synthesized PNAs are active in cell assays.
(a)
Names, sequences, quantities, and purities of EGFP PNAs and PPNA.
(b) Relative fluorescence (to PBS vehicle-treated cells) of flow-synthesized
anti-IVS2-654 PNA and relevant scramble PNA are compared to commercial
anti-IVS2-654 PNA, as determined by an EGFP assay in HeLa-654 cells.
PBS: Phosphate-buffered saline; LPF: Lipofectamine. (c) Dose–response
curves corresponding to activity in the EGFP assay for synthesized
unmodified PNA, PPNA, and PNA with lipofectamine. Activity is shown
as fluorescence intensity relative to PBS vehicle-treated HeLa-654
cells.
Automated flow-synthesized PNAs are active in cell assays.
(a)
Names, sequences, quantities, and purities of EGFP PNAs and PPNA.
(b) Relative fluorescence (to PBS vehicle-treated cells) of flow-synthesized
anti-IVS2-654 PNA and relevant scramble PNA are compared to commercial
anti-IVS2-654 PNA, as determined by an EGFP assay in HeLa-654 cells.
PBS: Phosphate-buffered saline; LPF: Lipofectamine. (c) Dose–response
curves corresponding to activity in the EGFP assay for synthesized
unmodified PNA, PPNA, and PNA with lipofectamine. Activity is shown
as fluorescence intensity relative to PBS vehicle-treated HeLa-654
cells.
Synthetic anti-SARS-CoV-2
PPNA Shows Over 95% Viral Inhibition
in a Live Infection Assay
The 5′ UTR of the coronavirus
genome is responsible for important biological functions, such as
viral replication, transcription,[40] and
packaging.[41] In previous studies, synthetic
antisense agents such as PNAs and phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers
(PMOs) targeting various sites in the 5′UTR of mouse hepatitis
virus[42,43] and SARS-CoV[17,44] demonstrated
viral inhibition. Recently, PPMOs were shown to effectively inhibit
SARS-CoV-2 replication.[45] To the best of
our knowledge, inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 with PPNAs has not been reported,
however.To further demonstrate the utility of our automated
single-shot technology, within 1 day we synthesized eight long PPNAs
(>15-mer) targeting the 5′UTR, the transcription regulatory
site (TRS), and the polyprotein 1a/b translation start site (AUG)
of SARS-CoV-2. After purification, each PPNA was obtained in milligram
amounts at >90% purity (Figure a). These PPNAs were evaluated for inhibition of SARS-CoV-2
replication in Vero-E6 cells. Anti-IVS2-654 PNA, which has no intracellular
target present in this assay, was selected as a negative control,
while a known inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 viral growth, EK1,[46,47] was used as a positive control. A multiplicity of infection (M.O.I.)
of 0.1 was used for virus inoculation for 2 h. PPNA treatments were
given at the same time as the viral infection and then continued after
virus removal. Subsequently, the viral RNA levels were measured 48
h after initial infection. We observed dose-dependent reduction of
the viral RNA replication with increasing concentrations of PPNAs
(Figure b). Sequences
designed to target the 5′UTR and AUG region were efficacious.
The 5′UTR-3 sequence reduced titers by 75% in the live SARS-CoV-2
assay, which was at the same level as EK1. Nearly complete inhibition
was achieved with the sequence 5′UTR-1 at 10 μM (IC50 = 0.8 μM, Figure c).
Figure 5
Dose-dependent inhibition of live SARS-CoV-2 replication
by a synthetic
PPNA library. (a) Names, sequences, target locations, quantities,
and purities of synthetic PPNAs. Locations on the SARS genomic RNA
are based on GenBank NC_045512. Bases targeting the SARS-CoV-2 leader-TRS
(nt 70–75) are in green; Bases targeting the AUG translation
start site are in blue. (b) Increasing concentrations of PPNAs result
in inhibition of viral replication as measured by total viral RNA
present. EK1 was selected as a positive control, and anti-IVS2-654
as a negative control. (c) Viral inhibition with PPNAs at 10 μM.
Dose-dependent inhibition of live SARS-CoV-2 replication
by a synthetic
PPNA library. (a) Names, sequences, target locations, quantities,
and purities of synthetic PPNAs. Locations on the SARS genomic RNA
are based on GenBank NC_045512. Bases targeting the SARS-CoV-2 leader-TRS
(nt 70–75) are in green; Bases targeting the AUG translation
start site are in blue. (b) Increasing concentrations of PPNAs result
in inhibition of viral replication as measured by total viral RNA
present. EK1 was selected as a positive control, and anti-IVS2-654
as a negative control. (c) Viral inhibition with PPNAs at 10 μM.
Conclusions
We developed an automated
flow technology that provides a route
to produce long (>15-mer) PNA–peptide conjugates with high
purine content, whereas traditional methods may require several rounds
of optimization. Furthermore, this automated synthesis protocol enables
access to PNA sequences on an accelerated time scale, more rapid than
traditional automated methods that use commercial microwave peptide
synthesizers or the DNA synthesizer Expedite 8909. No additional capping
or double couplings are needed even for the assembly of long PNA chains
with our approach.We took advantage of this streamlined flow
synthesis to produce
eight anti-SARS-CoV-2 peptide-conjugated PNAs in a single day. These
novel synthetic PPNAs were tested in a SARS-CoV-2 cell entry assay.
A PPNA sequence targeting the 5′UTR of SARS-CoV-2 was found
to reduce the viral titer by >95%. Given the favorable toxicological
profile of PNA compounds,[12] further investigations
on the therapeutic window of the PPNAs reported here are warranted.Although PNAs face challenges in translation to the clinic, the
introduction of the efficient and robust synthesis technology described
here represents a step forward by enabling on-demand rapid production
of candidate antisense oligonucleotides, not only for COVID-19 but
also for other diseases and emerging pathogens.
Authors: Benjamin W Neuman; David A Stein; Andrew D Kroeker; Michael J Churchill; Alice M Kim; Peter Kuhn; Philip Dawson; Hong M Moulton; Richard K Bestwick; Patrick L Iversen; Michael J Buchmeier Journal: J Virol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: A Saebi; M Poskus; N Hartrampf; Z P Gates; A J Callahan; A E Cowfer; S Hanna; S Antilla; C K Schissel; A J Quartararo; X Ye; A J Mijalis; M D Simon; A Loas; S Liu; C Jessen; T E Nielsen; B L Pentelute Journal: Science Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Carly K Schissel; Somesh Mohapatra; Justin M Wolfe; Colin M Fadzen; Kamela Bellovoda; Chia-Ling Wu; Jenna A Wood; Annika B Malmberg; Andrei Loas; Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli; Bradley L Pentelute Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Shuai Xia; Lei Yan; Wei Xu; Anurodh Shankar Agrawal; Abdullah Algaissi; Chien-Te K Tseng; Qian Wang; Lanying Du; Wenjie Tan; Ian A Wilson; Shibo Jiang; Bei Yang; Lu Lu Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 14.136