| Literature DB >> 35233233 |
Meng Wang1, Feng Shi2, Zhigang Zhou1, Yao Cui3, Kepu Du1, Shuai Li1, Tingting Liu3, Yanlin Chen3, Yadan Li1, Fei Gao1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and clinical value of computed tomography (CT)-guided trans-sternal puncture to implant 125I seeds to treat masses in the anterior or middle mediastinum.Entities:
Keywords: 125I seed; CT-guided; mediastinal metastasis; real-time planning; transdermal
Year: 2022 PMID: 35233233 PMCID: PMC8867229 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2022.113548
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Contemp Brachytherapy ISSN: 2081-2841
Fig. 1Patients with anterior or middle mediastinal metastasis underwent CT-guided via trans-sternal 125I seed implantation
Basic characteristics and dose parameters in pre-operative and post-operative plans of 20 patients, and their clinical responses after 125I implantation
| Variable | Patients’ no. ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years, mean ±SD) | 55.50 ±14.57 | |
| Sex ( | ||
| Male | 12 (60.0) | |
| Female | 8 (40.0) | |
| Primary cancer ( | ||
| Adrenal cortical carcinoma | 1 (5.0) | |
| Breast cancer | 3 (15.0) | |
| Esophageal cancer | 1 (5.0) | |
| Lung adenocarcinoma | 2 (10.0) | |
| Lung squamous cell carcinoma | 6 (30.0) | |
| Mediastinal keratinized squamous cell carcinoma | 1 (5.0) | |
| Primary mediastinal squamous cell carcinoma | 2 (10.0) | |
| Small cell lung carcinoma | 1 (5.0) | |
| Thymoma B2 | 2 (10.0) | |
| Thymoma C | 1 (5.0) | |
| Masses location ( | ||
| Anterior mediastinum | 14 (70.0) | |
| Middle mediastinum | 4 (20.0) | |
| Anterior and middle mediastinum | 2 (10.0) | |
| KPS ( | ||
| 70 | 7 (35.0) | |
| 80 | 10 (50.0) | |
| 90 | 3 (15.0) | |
| Largest dimension (cm, mean ±SD) | 4.11 ±1.79 | |
| GTV | ||
| Post-operative (cm3, mean ±SD) | 26.69 ±25.22 | |
| Pre-operative (cm3, mean ±SD) | 26.84 ±26.96 | |
| 0.723 | ||
| Median prescribed dose | ||
| Post-operative (Gy, mean ±SD) | 69.81 ±19.53 | |
| Pre-operative (Gy, mean ±SD) | 75.92 ±24.61 | |
| 0.079 | ||
| D90 | ||
| Post-operative (Gy, mean ±SD) | 134.30 ±14.53 | |
| Pre-operative (Gy, mean ±SD) | 139.42 ±14.49 | |
| 0.015 | ||
| V90 | ||
| Post-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 96.10 ±1.55 | |
| Pre-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 97.15 ±2.09 | |
| 0.013 | ||
| V100 | ||
| Post-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 92.69 ±1.93 | |
| Pre-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 94.28 ±2.15 | |
| 0.009 | ||
| V150 | ||
| Post-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 66.86 ±7.53 | |
| Pre-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 64.33 ±6.95 | |
| 0.243 | ||
| V200 | ||
| Post-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 42.95 ±9.11 | |
| Pre-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 35.52 ±8.93 | |
| 0.014 | ||
| CI | ||
| Post-operative | 0.65 ±0.06 | |
| Pre-operative | 0.67 ±0.08 | |
| 0.411 | ||
| EI | ||
| Post-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 40.79 ±13.72 | |
| Pre-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 40.62 ±15.22 | |
| 0.881 | ||
| HI | ||
| Post-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 27.90 ±7.53 | |
| Pre-operative (%, mean ±SD) | 31.78 ±7.28 | |
| 0.126 | ||
| Mean number of implanted seeds | ||
| Post-operative (mean ±SD) | 31.05 ±18.94 | |
| Pre-operative (mean ±SD) | 30.85 ±20.70 | |
| 0.247 | ||
| 2-month follow-up | ||
| Number of patients | 20 | |
| Local control efficacy | 3 CR, 10 PR, 7 SD, 0 PD | |
| Local control rate (%) | 65.0 | |
| Sum of longest dimension decrease from baseline (cm, mean ± SD) | –1.63 ±1.33 | |
| 6-month follow-up | ||
| Number of patients | 17 | |
| Local control efficacy | 2 CR, 9 PR, 5 SD, 1 PD | |
| Local control rate (%) | 64.7 | |
| Sum of longest dimension decrease from baseline (cm, mean ±SD) | –1.80 ±1.47 | |
| 12-month follow-up | ||
| Number of patients | 13 | |
| Local control efficacy | 1 CR, 6 PR, 4 SD, 2 PD | |
| Local control rate (%) | 53.8 | |
| Sum of longest dimension decrease from baseline (cm, mean ±SD) | –1.62 ±1.98 | |
CI – conformity index; CR – complete response; EI – external index; GTV – gross tumor volume; HI – homogeneity index; KPS – Karnofsky performance scale; PD – progressive disease; PR – partial response; SD – stable disease
Fig. 2Case 1: A 61-year-old male with lung squamous cell carcinoma. Pre-operative plan (A, B). BTPS simulated needle path, and seed number and distribution were calculated; the DVH (C). Prescribed dose was 120 Gy, D90 was 136.88 Gy, and V100 was 95%
Fig. 3Case 1: The needles punctured via the trans-sternal route (A, B); Intraoperative real-time plan (C, D)
Fig. 4Case 1: 125I seed distribution immediately after the surgery (A, B). Dose evaluation generated DVH (C). D90 was 127.23 Gy and V100 was 92.5%
Fig. 5Case 2: A 53-year-old patient with mediastinal metastatic lymph node recurrence from esophageal squamous cell carci- noma. 125I seeds distribution immediately after the surgery (A); Disappearance of the target lesion and only accumulative 125I seed shadows were detectable by image analysis (arrow) (B); The local therapeutic efficacy was complete response
Fig. 6Case 3: A 60-year-old patient with primary mediastinal squamous cell carcinoma. 125I seeds distribution immediately after the surgery (arrow) (A); The size of the tumor was decreased 2 months after the surgery (B) (arrow). The local therapeutic efficacy was partial response