Despoina Theotoka1, Sarah Wall1, Anat Galor2, Wathanee Sripawadkul3, Rayan Abou Khzam4, Vincent Tang4, Dubovy L Sander4, Carol L Karp5. 1. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 2. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Miami Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA. 3. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand. 4. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Florida Lions Ocular Pathology Laboratory, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. 5. Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: ckarp@med.miami.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Ocular surface masqueraders encompass any ocular surface lesion masquerading as another ocular surface lesion. High resolution optical coherence tomography (HR-OCT) has emerged as an adjunctive tool to clinical acumen. This study's purpose is to evaluate the utility of HR-OCT images in guiding the diagnosis and management of those lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 22 individuals with a clinically ambiguous ocular surface lesion with slit lamp photographs (SLP), HR-OCT images, and histopathological examination were included in the study. The presumptive clinical diagnosis based on SLP was compared to the diagnosis suggested by HR-OCT findings and to definitive diagnosis by histopathology. The main outcome of this study was the frequency in which HR-OCT findings guided the clinician to the correct diagnosis. RESULTS: 7 lesions were epithelial, 3 had an epithelial and a subepithelial component, and 12 were subepithelial. HR-OCT was most effective in discerning lesion location, successfully identifying the location in 100% of cases. Classic HR-OCT findings were detected in 68.2% of cases while suggestive features were detected in 31.8% of cases. The epithelial lesions' mean epithelial thickness was 265.4 ± 140.6 μm, the subepithelial lesions' mean was 58.0 ± 25.0 μm, and the combined lesions' mean was 140.0 ± 70.0 μm. The epithelium was significantly thicker in epithelial lesions compared to subepithelial and combined lesions. By ROC analysis we identified that using a cut off of 156 μm, the sensitivity was 86% and the specificity was 93%. DISCUSSION: HR-OCT can be a valuable diagnostic tool, assisting in the differentiation of ambiguous ocular surface pathologies by providing a cross-sectional, morphological image of the lesion.
INTRODUCTION: Ocular surface masqueraders encompass any ocular surface lesion masquerading as another ocular surface lesion. High resolution optical coherence tomography (HR-OCT) has emerged as an adjunctive tool to clinical acumen. This study's purpose is to evaluate the utility of HR-OCT images in guiding the diagnosis and management of those lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 22 individuals with a clinically ambiguous ocular surface lesion with slit lamp photographs (SLP), HR-OCT images, and histopathological examination were included in the study. The presumptive clinical diagnosis based on SLP was compared to the diagnosis suggested by HR-OCT findings and to definitive diagnosis by histopathology. The main outcome of this study was the frequency in which HR-OCT findings guided the clinician to the correct diagnosis. RESULTS: 7 lesions were epithelial, 3 had an epithelial and a subepithelial component, and 12 were subepithelial. HR-OCT was most effective in discerning lesion location, successfully identifying the location in 100% of cases. Classic HR-OCT findings were detected in 68.2% of cases while suggestive features were detected in 31.8% of cases. The epithelial lesions' mean epithelial thickness was 265.4 ± 140.6 μm, the subepithelial lesions' mean was 58.0 ± 25.0 μm, and the combined lesions' mean was 140.0 ± 70.0 μm. The epithelium was significantly thicker in epithelial lesions compared to subepithelial and combined lesions. By ROC analysis we identified that using a cut off of 156 μm, the sensitivity was 86% and the specificity was 93%. DISCUSSION: HR-OCT can be a valuable diagnostic tool, assisting in the differentiation of ambiguous ocular surface pathologies by providing a cross-sectional, morphological image of the lesion.