Literature DB >> 35230615

Testing the Impact of the Whole-Day Good Behavior Game on Aggressive Behavior: Results of a Classroom-Based Randomized Effectiveness Trial.

Holly C Wilcox1, Hanno Petras2,3, Hendricks C Brown2,4, Sheppard G Kellam2.   

Abstract

Three generations of developmental epidemiologically based randomized field trials of the Good Behavior Game (GBG) have been delivered to Baltimore elementary schools. With the collaboration of family and community partners, all three trials were directed at decreasing proximal targets of aggressive behavior and improving learning in first-grade classrooms with distal mental health and substance abuse outcomes. GBG is a group-contingent classroom behavior management strategy that promotes classmate/peer concern for each child's positive behavior by rewarding teams with below-criterion levels of aggressive, disruptive behavior. GBG targets early risk factors for the above distal outcomes: aggressive, disruptive behavior, family/school relationships, and school failure. Here, we report on the third-generation randomized prevention trial of the GBG (whole-day first grade program (WD)), including 12 elementary schools. WD enhanced the standard curriculum in the areas of classroom behavior management; academic instruction, particularly reading; and family-classroom partnerships. Using a within-school classroom randomized trial design, we: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of the WD program by sex and cohort and 2) measure variation in WD impact by the quality of teachers' behavior management practices. Data from 961 first graders were used in general growth mixture modeling that accounts for classroom randomization to identify distinct developmental trajectories of aggressive, disruptive behavior and GBG impact on these trajectories. In the chronic high aggression trajectory of males, ratings of aggression after WD implementation and to the end of third grade were significantly lower in the WD condition than in controls in classrooms with a higher WD dosage (Cohort 2) and especially in classrooms with higher quality of WD implementation. For females, we found a modest but significant benefit of GBG in the low trajectory class when cohorts were combined. Regarding policy implications, embedding GBG into the curricula in teacher's colleges could better support student learning and behavior. Clinical Trials Registration number: NCT00257088.
© 2022. Society for Prevention Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggressive Behavior; Good Behavior Game; Implementation; Primary Prevention; Randomized Controlled Trial; Universal Prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35230615     DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01334-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  27 in total

Review 1.  The application of latent curve analysis to testing developmental theories in intervention research.

Authors:  P J Curran; B O Muthén
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Principles for designing randomized preventive trials in mental health: an emerging developmental epidemiology paradigm.

Authors:  C H Brown; J Liao
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  1999-10

Review 3.  Analyzing longitudinal data with missing values.

Authors:  Craig K Enders
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2011-10-03

4.  Good behavior game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom.

Authors:  H H Barrish; M Saunders; M M Wolf
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

Review 5.  Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control?

Authors:  A V Dane; B H Schneider
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01

6.  Testing model nesting and equivalence.

Authors:  Peter M Bentler; Albert Satorra
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-06

7.  Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population.

Authors:  G J Botvin; E Baker; L Dusenbury; E M Botvin; T Diaz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Childhood and adolescent antecedents of substance use in adulthood.

Authors:  Margaret E Ensminger; Hee Soon Juon; Kate E Fothergill
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Longitudinal Impact of Two Universal Preventive Interventions in First Grade on Educational Outcomes in High School.

Authors:  Catherine P Bradshaw; Jessika H Zmuda; Sheppard G Kellam; Nicholas S Ialongo
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2009-11-01

10.  Two-Year Impact of Prevention Programs on Adolescent Depression: an Integrative Data Analysis Approach.

Authors:  C Hendricks Brown; Ahnalee Brincks; Shi Huang; Tatiana Perrino; Gracelyn Cruden; Hilda Pantin; George Howe; Jami F Young; William Beardslee; Samantha Montag; Irwin Sandler
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.