Literature DB >> 35229652

Improving Burst Wave Lithotripsy Effectiveness for Small Stones and Fragments by Increasing Frequency: Theoretical Modeling and Ex Vivo Study.

Michael R Bailey1,2, Adam D Maxwell1,2, Shunxiang Cao3, Shivani Ramesh1, Ziyue Liu4, James C Williams5, Jeff Thiel1, Barbrina Dunmire1, Tim Colonius3, Ekaterina Kuznetsova1, Wayne Kreider1, Mathew D Sorensen2,6, James E Lingeman7, Oleg A Sapozhnikov1,8.   

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: In clinical trial NCT03873259, a 2.6-mm lower pole stone was treated transcutaneously and ex vivo with 390-kHz burst wave lithotripsy (BWL) for 40 minutes and failed to break. The stone was subsequently fragmented with 650-kHz BWL after a 4-minute exposure. This study investigated how to fragment small stones and why varying the BWL frequency may more effectively fragment stones to dust.
Methods: A linear elastic theoretical model was used to calculate the stress created inside stones from shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and different BWL frequencies mimicking the stone's size, shape, lamellar structure, and composition. To test model predictions about the impact of BWL frequency, matched pairs of stones (1-5 mm) were treated at (1) 390 kHz, (2) 830 kHz, and (3) 390 kHz followed by 830 kHz. The mass of fragments >1 and 2 mm was measured over 10 minutes of exposure.
Results: The linear elastic model predicts that the maximum principal stress inside a stone increases to more than 5.5 times the pressure applied by the ultrasound wave as frequency is increased, regardless of the composition tested. The threshold frequency for stress amplification is proportionate to the wave speed divided by the stone diameter. Thus, smaller stones may be likely to fragment at a higher frequency, but not at a lower frequency below a limit. Unlike with SWL, this amplification in BWL occurs consistently with spherical and irregularly shaped stones. In water tank experiments, stones smaller than the threshold size broke fastest at high frequency (p = 0.0003), whereas larger stones broke equally well to submillimeter dust at high, low, or mixed frequencies. Conclusions: For small stones and fragments, increasing frequency of BWL may produce amplified stress in the stone causing the stone to break. Using the strategies outlined here, stones of all sizes may be turned to dust efficiently with BWL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lithotripsy; urinary stones; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35229652      PMCID: PMC9293685          DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.619


  19 in total

Review 1.  The mechanisms of stone fragmentation in ESWL.

Authors:  W Eisenmenger
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Modeling of photoelastic imaging of mechanical stresses in transparent solids mimicking kidney stones.

Authors:  Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Adam D Maxwell; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mechanical testing of urinary calculi.

Authors:  N P Cohen; H N Whitfield
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Fragmentation of urinary calculi in vitro by burst wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Bryan W Cunitz; Wayne Kreider; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Ryan S Hsi; Jonathan D Harper; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Maximizing mechanical stress in small urinary stones during burst wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Adam D Maxwell; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Variations of stress field and stone fracture produced at different lateral locations in a shockwave lithotripter field.

Authors:  Gaoming Xiang; Xiaojian Ma; Cosima Liang; Hongyang Yu; Defei Liao; Georgy Sankin; Shunxiang Cao; Kevin Wang; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  First in Human Clinical Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Franklin C Lee; Mathew D Sorensen; Ryan S Hsi; Jeff Thiel; Hunter Wessells; James E Lingeman; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  First In-Human Burst Wave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stone Comminution: Initial Two Case Studies.

Authors:  Jonathan D Harper; Ian Metzler; Michael Kennedy Hall; Tony T Chen; Adam D Maxwell; Bryan W Cunitz; Barbrina Dunmire; Jeff Thiel; James C Williams; Michael R Bailey; Mathew D Sorensen
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Using micro computed tomographic imaging for analyzing kidney stones.

Authors:  James C Williams; James E Lingeman; Michel Daudon; Dominique Bazin
Journal:  C R Chim       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Burst wave lithotripsy and acoustic manipulation of stones.

Authors:  Tony T Chen; Patrick C Samson; Mathew D Sorensen; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.