Literature DB >> 35229637

Minimal Crossover between Mutations Associated with Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2 and CD8+ T-Cell Epitopes Identified in COVID-19 Convalescent Individuals.

Andrew D Redd1,2, Alessandra Nardin3, Hassen Kared3, Evan M Bloch4, Brian Abel3, Andrew Pekosz5, Oliver Laeyendecker1,2, Michael Fehlings3, Thomas C Quinn1,2, Aaron A R Tobian4.   

Abstract

There is a growing concern that ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 could lead to variants of concern (VOC) that are capable of avoiding some or all of the multifaceted immune response generated by both prior infection or vaccination, with the recently described B.1.1.529 (Omicron) VOC being of particular interest. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples from PCR-confirmed, recovered COVID-19 convalescent individuals (n = 30) infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the United States collected in April and May 2020 who possessed at least one or more of six different HLA haplotypes were selected for examination of their anti-SARS-CoV-2 CD8+ T-cell responses using a multiplexed peptide-major histocompatibility complex tetramer staining approach. This analysis examined if the previously identified viral epitopes targeted by CD8+ T cells in these individuals (n = 52 distinct epitopes) are mutated in the newly described Omicron VOC (n = 50 mutations). Within this population, only one low-prevalence epitope from the Spike protein, restricted to two HLA alleles and found in 2/30 (7%) individuals, contained a single amino acid change associated with the Omicron VOC. These data suggest that virtually all individuals with existing anti-SARS-CoV-2 CD8+ T-cell responses should recognize the Omicron VOC and that SARS-CoV-2 has not evolved extensive T-cell escape mutations at this time. IMPORTANCE The newly identified Omicron variant of concern contains more mutations than any of the previous variants described to date. In addition, many of the mutations associated with the Omicron variant are found in areas that are likely bound by neutralizing antibodies, suggesting that the first line of immunological defense against COVID-19 is compromised. However, both natural infection and vaccination develop T-cell-based responses in addition to antibodies. This study examined if the parts of the virus, or epitopes, targeted by the CD8+ T-cell response in 30 individuals who recovered from COVID-19 in 2020 were mutated in the Omicron variant. Only one of 52 epitopes identified in this population contained an amino acid that was mutated in Omicron. These data suggest that the T-cell immune response in previously infected, and most likely vaccinated, individuals should still be effective against Omicron.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD8+ T cell; COVID-19; Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; convalescent patients; convalescent plasma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35229637      PMCID: PMC8941890          DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03617-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mBio            Impact factor:   7.786


OBSERVATION

As the global COVID-19 pandemic has continued, there is growing concern that ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 could lead to a variant of the virus that is capable of avoiding the multifaceted immune response generated by both prior infection or vaccination (1–3). Several of these variants of concern (VOC) have been identified throughout the pandemic and have been associated with large-scale waves of infection. To date, while several VOC have exhibited various levels of antibody resistance in vitro, vaccination, as well as previous infection by SARS-CoV-2, have been shown to maintain a significant level of protection against breakthrough or reinfections, especially in terms of preventing serious disease and mortality (4, 5). However, the B.1.1.529/Omicron variant contains a greater number of mutations than previous VOC (6). If the mutations in the Omicron VOC mediated resistance from any part of the anti-SARC-CoV-2 immune response, either from vaccination or infection, it could have consequences for efforts to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. The variant also has now been identified on every continent except Antarctica, suggesting it has significant transmission potential, similar to other VOC. The majority of the mutations associated with the Omicron VOC are located in the Spike protein of the virus, presumably due to selection for evasion of antibody responses, and could have significant effects on the ability of preexisting antibodies to neutralize the virus, although to what extent this is the case has yet to be determined. It is also unknown how these mutations affect nonneutralizing binding antibody responses. While it is critical to determine the extent to which Omicron may or may not be susceptible to existing humoral responses, T-cell-associated immunity is, in general, significantly more difficult for viruses to overcome due to the broad and adaptable response generated in a given individual as well as the variety of HLA haplotypes between individuals. A previous analysis by our group of CD8+ T-cell responses to the original SARS-CoV-2 variant in convalescent individuals found a broad and varied immune response in virtually all patients examined, even in individuals with relatively low anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses (1). A subsequent analysis of these data found that mutations associated with the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma VOC had very minimal cross-over with the epitopes identified in this earlier study (1/52 epitopes affected), suggesting that the CD8+ T-cell response from earlier infection most likely would be effective against the new variants (7). In this study, the mutations associated with Omicron VOC are examined in an identical manner.

RESULTS

The individuals examined in this study were primarily male (60%), and the blood samples were collected a median of 42.5 days (interquartile range, 37.5 to 48.0) from initial diagnosis (1). The patients were selected from the larger study population according to sample availability, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG responses with 10 individuals were selected from each of three antibody tertiles (1, 3). A total of 132 SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T-cell responses were identified in these individuals, which corresponded to 52 unique epitopes found across the viral genome targeting both structural and nonstructural proteins. Of the mutations associated with the Omicron variant (n = 50), only one in the Spike protein (T95I) overlapped a CD8+ T-cell epitope (GVYFASTEK) identified in this population (Fig. 1; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). This epitope is restricted to HLA-A*03:01 and HLA-A*11:01, and T-cell reactivity was detected in two individuals, typed as HLA-A*03:01 and HLA-A*03:01/HLA-A*11:01, respectively (Tables S1 and S2) (8). Despite the possibility of inducing T-cell responses against GVYFASTEK, presented on both alleles in one individual, this epitope represented a low-prevalence target in both of these individuals, making up 0.1% and a combined 0.3% of all CD8+ T-cell responses in each individual (Table S3) (1). In addition, this epitope was 1 of 5 and 1 of 8 of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 epitopes targeted by the two individuals, respectively (Table S3).
FIG 1

SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan variant protein amino acid sequence for Spike protein with CD8+ T-cell epitopes highlighted (green), and all mutation and deletion (slash) sites are indicated in large blue letters.

SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan variant protein amino acid sequence for Spike protein with CD8+ T-cell epitopes highlighted (green), and all mutation and deletion (slash) sites are indicated in large blue letters. SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan variant protein amino acid sequence with CD8+ T cell epitopes highlighted in green, and all mutation and deletion (slash) sites are indicated in large blue letters (nonoverlapping). Download FIG S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB. Study population detection of HLA-A03 and -A11. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.02 MB. Demographics of subjects with a T-cell response against the original spike epitope, mutated in Omicron. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB. T-cell reactivity against HLA-A*03:01- and HLA-A*11:01-restricted epitopes in two subjects with T-cell responses against the original spike epitope that was found mutated in Omicron HLA. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB. For both HLA-A*03:01- and HLA-A*11:01-restricted epitopes, amino acids V in position two and L in position nine act as strong anchor residues. In addition, position seven, which is the location of the T95I mutation, can also contribute to HLA binding and, in fact, may be a preferred residue for this location (9, 10). Therefore, it is possible that the T95I mutation actually improves epitope binding. However, while binding to major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) may not be detrimentally affected, it is unknown how the mutation would affect the ability of T-cell receptors selected against the original peptide to recognize the mutated peptide in the MHC.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that despite the substantial number of mutations in the Omicron VOC, only one low-prevalence CD8+ T-cell epitope from the Spike protein contained a single amino acid change. No other mutations were associated with previously identified epitopes. These data suggest that virtually all individuals with existing anti-SARS-CoV-2 CD8+ T-cell responses should recognize the Omicron VOC and that SARS-CoV-2 has not evolved extensive T-cell escape mutations at this point. There are several limitations in this study. The results are based on a relatively small sample size of individuals who were all from the United States. Additionally, we examined the CD8+ T-cell responses in previously infected but not vaccinated individuals, and it is possible that the T-cell responses in the latter group are more limited and therefore more susceptible to escape. However, work examining T-cell responses from vaccinees has demonstrated a strong CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell response in these individuals, suggesting that similar trends should be seen in this population as well (2, 11). While it is unknown what specific immune response, or more likely, combination of responses, provides optimum protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease, it almost certainly includes a broad and robust CD8+ T-cell response. These data build on the previous analysis of the initial VOC and confirm that while SARS-CoV-2 has demonstrated a continued pattern of ongoing evolution, this has not resulted in any meaningful accumulation of CD8+ T-cell escape mutations (7). These data also suggest that existing CD8+ T-cell responses from a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and most likely from vaccination, will still recognize the Omicron VOC and should provide a significant level of protection against COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The detailed methods of the earlier two studies were published previously (1, 7). In short, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples from PCR-confirmed, recovered COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors collected in April and May 2020 in the Baltimore, MD, and Washington, DC, region who possessed at least one or more of six different HLA haplotypes (HLA-A*01:01, HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*03:01, HLA-A*11:01, HLA-A*24:02, and HLA-B*07:02) were selected for examination of their anti-SARS-CoV-2 CD8+ T-cell responses using a multiplexed peptide-MHC tetramer staining approach. The peptides used to evaluate the SARS-CoV-2–specific CD8+ T cells and the specific T-cell antigen specificities are available in the previously published supplemental methods (1). The mutations associated with Omicron VOC (PL, K38R, delta1265, L1266I, A1892T; Nsp4, T492I; 3CL, P132H; Nsp6, delta105-107, I189V; RdRp, P323L; Nsp14, I42V; Spike, A67V, delta69-70, T95I, G142D, delta143-145, N211I; L212V_RE, V213P, R214E, G339D, S371L, S373P, K417N, N440K, G446S, S477N, T478K, E484A, Q493R, G496S, Q498R, T547K, D614G, H655Y, N679K, P681H, N764K, D796Y, N856K, Q954H, N969K, L981F; envelope, T9I; matrix, D3G, Q19E, A63T; nucleocapsid, P13L, delta31-33, R203K, G204R) were mapped to the epitope map developed in the previous analyses and examined for possible crossover (12).

Ethics.

All study participants provided written informed consent, and this study was approved by the Johns Hopkins Institutional Review Board.
  10 in total

1.  Identification and characterisation of peptide binding motifs of six autoimmune disease-associated human leukocyte antigen-class I molecules including HLA-B*39:06.

Authors:  M Eichmann; A de Ru; P A van Veelen; M Peakman; D Kronenberg-Versteeg
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  2014-08-25

2.  SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce broad CD4+ T cell responses that recognize SARS-CoV-2 variants and HCoV-NL63.

Authors:  Bezawit A Woldemeskel; Caroline C Garliss; Joel N Blankson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Polymorphism between HLA-A*0301 and A*0302 located outside the pocket F alters the PΩ peptide motif.

Authors:  N E Elamin; C Bade-Doeding; R Blasczyk; B Eiz-Vesper
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  2010-12

4.  SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell responses in convalescent COVID-19 individuals.

Authors:  Hassen Kared; Andrew D Redd; Evan M Bloch; Tania S Bonny; Hermi Sumatoh; Faris Kairi; Daniel Carbajo; Brian Abel; Evan W Newell; Maria P Bettinotti; Sarah E Benner; Eshan U Patel; Kirsten Littlefield; Oliver Laeyendecker; Shmuel Shoham; David Sullivan; Arturo Casadevall; Andrew Pekosz; Alessandra Nardin; Michael Fehlings; Aaron Ar Tobian; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in Qatar.

Authors:  Patrick Tang; Mohammad R Hasan; Hiam Chemaitelly; Hadi M Yassine; Fatiha M Benslimane; Hebah A Al Khatib; Sawsan AlMukdad; Peter Coyle; Houssein H Ayoub; Zaina Al Kanaani; Einas Al Kuwari; Andrew Jeremijenko; Anvar Hassan Kaleeckal; Ali Nizar Latif; Riyazuddin Mohammad Shaik; Hanan F Abdul Rahim; Gheyath K Nasrallah; Mohamed Ghaith Al Kuwari; Hamad Eid Al Romaihi; Adeel A Butt; Mohamed H Al-Thani; Abdullatif Al Khal; Roberto Bertollini; Laith J Abu-Raddad
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Sex, age, and hospitalization drive antibody responses in a COVID-19 convalescent plasma donor population.

Authors:  Sabra L Klein; Andrew Pekosz; Han-Sol Park; Rebecca L Ursin; Janna R Shapiro; Sarah E Benner; Kirsten Littlefield; Swetha Kumar; Harnish Mukesh Naik; Michael J Betenbaugh; Ruchee Shrestha; Annie A Wu; Robert M Hughes; Imani Burgess; Patricio Caturegli; Oliver Laeyendecker; Thomas C Quinn; David Sullivan; Shmuel Shoham; Andrew D Redd; Evan M Bloch; Arturo Casadevall; Aaron Ar Tobian
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals.

Authors:  Alba Grifoni; Daniela Weiskopf; Sydney I Ramirez; Jose Mateus; Jennifer M Dan; Carolyn Rydyznski Moderbacher; Stephen A Rawlings; Aaron Sutherland; Lakshmanane Premkumar; Ramesh S Jadi; Daniel Marrama; Aravinda M de Silva; April Frazier; Aaron F Carlin; Jason A Greenbaum; Bjoern Peters; Florian Krammer; Davey M Smith; Shane Crotty; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 66.850

8.  CD8+ T-Cell Responses in COVID-19 Convalescent Individuals Target Conserved Epitopes From Multiple Prominent SARS-CoV-2 Circulating Variants.

Authors:  Andrew D Redd; Alessandra Nardin; Hassen Kared; Evan M Bloch; Andrew Pekosz; Oliver Laeyendecker; Brian Abel; Michael Fehlings; Thomas C Quinn; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.835

9.  Rapid and stable mobilization of CD8+ T cells by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.

Authors:  Valerie Oberhardt; Hendrik Luxenburger; Janine Kemming; Isabel Schulien; Kevin Ciminski; Sebastian Giese; Benedikt Csernalabics; Julia Lang-Meli; Iga Janowska; Julian Staniek; Katharina Wild; Kristi Basho; Mircea Stefan Marinescu; Jonas Fuchs; Fernando Topfstedt; Ales Janda; Oezlem Sogukpinar; Hanna Hilger; Katarina Stete; Florian Emmerich; Bertram Bengsch; Cornelius F Waller; Siegbert Rieg; Tobias Boettler; Katharina Zoldan; Georg Kochs; Martin Schwemmle; Marta Rizzi; Robert Thimme; Christoph Neumann-Haefelin; Maike Hofmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant.

Authors:  Jamie Lopez Bernal; Nick Andrews; Charlotte Gower; Eileen Gallagher; Ruth Simmons; Simon Thelwall; Julia Stowe; Elise Tessier; Natalie Groves; Gavin Dabrera; Richard Myers; Colin N J Campbell; Gayatri Amirthalingam; Matt Edmunds; Maria Zambon; Kevin E Brown; Susan Hopkins; Meera Chand; Mary Ramsay
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  30 in total

1.  Immune responses in Omicron SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in vaccinated adults.

Authors:  Ludvig A Munthe; Siri Mjaaland; Hassen Kared; Asia-Sophia Wolf; Amin Alirezaylavasani; Anthony Ravussin; Guri Solum; Trung The Tran; Fridtjof Lund-Johansen; John Torgils Vaage; Lise Sofie Nissen-Meyer; Unni C Nygaard; Olav Hungnes; Anna H Robertson; Lisbeth Meyer Næss; Lill Trogstad; Per Magnus
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Neutralization of Omicron BA.1, BA.2, and BA.3 SARS-CoV-2 by 3 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine.

Authors:  Chaitanya Kurhade; Jing Zou; Hongjie Xia; Hui Cai; Qi Yang; Mark Cutler; David Cooper; Alexander Muik; Kathrin U Jansen; Xuping Xie; Kena A Swanson; Pei-Yong Shi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients Infected by the Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jianguo Zhang; Nan Chen; Daguo Zhao; Jinhui Zhang; Zhenkui Hu; Zhimin Tao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-09

Review 4.  Mutational Pattern, Impacts and Potential Preventive Strategies of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variant Infection.

Authors:  Endeshaw Chekol Abebe; Markeshaw Tiruneh G/Medhin; Awgichew Behaile T/Mariam; Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie; Teklie Mengie Ayele; Fitalew Tadele Admasu; Zelalem Tilahun Muche; Getachew Asmare Adela
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.177

5.  Older Adults Mount Less Durable Humoral Responses to Two Doses of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine but Strong Initial Responses to a Third Dose.

Authors:  Francis Mwimanzi; Hope R Lapointe; Peter K Cheung; Yurou Sang; Fatima Yaseen; Gisele Umviligihozo; Rebecca Kalikawe; Sneha Datwani; F Harrison Omondi; Laura Burns; Landon Young; Victor Leung; Olga Agafitei; Siobhan Ennis; Winnie Dong; Simran Basra; Li Yi Lim; Kurtis Ng; Ralph Pantophlet; Chanson J Brumme; Julio S G Montaner; Natalie Prystajecky; Christopher F Lowe; Mari L DeMarco; Daniel T Holmes; Janet Simons; Masahiro Niikura; Marc G Romney; Zabrina L Brumme; Mark A Brockman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 7.759

Review 6.  Emerging evidence on Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant.

Authors:  Vineet Sharma; Himanshu Rai; Dev N S Gautam; Pradeep K Prajapati; Rohit Sharma
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 20.693

7.  T cell receptor sequencing identifies prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and correlates with neutralizing antibodies and disease severity.

Authors:  Rebecca Elyanow; Thomas M Snyder; Sudeb C Dalai; Rachel M Gittelman; Jim Boonyaratanakornkit; Anna Wald; Stacy Selke; Mark H Wener; Chihiro Morishima; Alexander L Greninger; Michael Gale; Tien-Ying Hsiang; Lichen Jing; Michael R Holbrook; Ian M Kaplan; H Jabran Zahid; Damon H May; Jonathan M Carlson; Lance Baldo; Thomas Manley; Harlan S Robins; David M Koelle
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 8.  Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant, salient features, high global health concerns and strategies to counter it amid ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Rekha Khandia; Shailja Singhal; Taha Alqahtani; Mohammad Amjad Kamal; Nahed A El-Shall; Firzan Nainu; Perumal Arumugam Desingu; Kuldeep Dhama
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 8.431

9.  Neutralization and durability of 2 or 3 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine against Omicron SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Hongjie Xia; Jing Zou; Chaitanya Kurhade; Hui Cai; Qi Yang; Mark Cutler; David Cooper; Alexander Muik; Kathrin U Jansen; Xuping Xie; Kena A Swanson; Pei-Yong Shi
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 31.316

Review 10.  Molecular variants of SARS-CoV-2: antigenic properties and current vaccine efficacy.

Authors:  Amirmasoud Rayati Damavandi; Razieh Dowran; Sarah Al Sharif; Fatah Kashanchi; Reza Jafari
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.148

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.