Sara R Till1, Andrew Schrepf2, Jennifer Pierce3, Stephanie Moser3, Ellen Kolarik3, Chad Brummett2, Sawsan As-Sanie1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; and Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; and Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our aims were to describe characteristics of sexual function prior to and 6months following benign hysterectomy in patients with three common surgical indications, and to identify preoperative factors that influence the magnitude and direction of change in sexual function after the procedure. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled women (n =80) undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Patients were categorised into three groups according to surgical indication: (1) pelvic pain (PP), (2) abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), and (3) pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Primary outcome was Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), which patients completed preoperatively and 6months postoperatively. RESULTS: The study included 80 patients, of whom 25.0% (n =20) had surgical indication of PP, 46.3% (n =37) of AUB, and 28.7% (n =23) of POP. PP patients experienced a significant improvement in overall sexual function, as well as orgasm and pain domains following hysterectomy. Significant improvements were not found in AUB and POP patients. In multivariate analysis, lower baseline sexual function (P <0.001), younger age (P =0.013), and pelvic pain<6months (P =0.020) were each independently associated with improvement in sexual function, but surgical indication was not significant. CONCLUSION: Individual patient factors including younger age, lower baseline sexual function, and short duration of pelvic pain are associated with a higher likelihood of improvement in sexual function after hysterectomy. Surgical indication does not appear to be predictive of postoperative sexual function once accounting for other factors.
BACKGROUND: Our aims were to describe characteristics of sexual function prior to and 6months following benign hysterectomy in patients with three common surgical indications, and to identify preoperative factors that influence the magnitude and direction of change in sexual function after the procedure. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study enrolled women (n =80) undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Patients were categorised into three groups according to surgical indication: (1) pelvic pain (PP), (2) abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), and (3) pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Primary outcome was Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), which patients completed preoperatively and 6months postoperatively. RESULTS: The study included 80 patients, of whom 25.0% (n =20) had surgical indication of PP, 46.3% (n =37) of AUB, and 28.7% (n =23) of POP. PP patients experienced a significant improvement in overall sexual function, as well as orgasm and pain domains following hysterectomy. Significant improvements were not found in AUB and POP patients. In multivariate analysis, lower baseline sexual function (P <0.001), younger age (P =0.013), and pelvic pain<6months (P =0.020) were each independently associated with improvement in sexual function, but surgical indication was not significant. CONCLUSION: Individual patient factors including younger age, lower baseline sexual function, and short duration of pelvic pain are associated with a higher likelihood of improvement in sexual function after hysterectomy. Surgical indication does not appear to be predictive of postoperative sexual function once accounting for other factors.
Authors: Frederick Wolfe; Daniel J Clauw; Mary-Ann Fitzcharles; Don L Goldenberg; Winfried Häuser; Robert S Katz; Philip Mease; Anthony S Russell; I Jon Russell; John B Winfield Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: David Cella; William Riley; Arthur Stone; Nan Rothrock; Bryce Reeve; Susan Yount; Dagmar Amtmann; Rita Bode; Daniel Buysse; Seung Choi; Karon Cook; Robert Devellis; Darren DeWalt; James F Fries; Richard Gershon; Elizabeth A Hahn; Jin-Shei Lai; Paul Pilkonis; Dennis Revicki; Matthias Rose; Kevin Weinfurt; Ron Hays Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Julia C Radosa; Gabriele Meyberg-Solomayer; Christina Kastl; Christoph G Radosa; Russalina Mavrova; Stefan Gräber; Sascha Baum; Marc P Radosa Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Katherine E Hartmann; Cindy Ma; Georgine M Lamvu; Patricia W Langenberg; John F Steege; Kristen H Kjerulff Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.661