Literature DB >> 25042204

Influences of different hysterectomy techniques on patients' postoperative sexual function and quality of life.

Julia C Radosa1, Gabriele Meyberg-Solomayer, Christina Kastl, Christoph G Radosa, Russalina Mavrova, Stefan Gräber, Sascha Baum, Marc P Radosa.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy ranks among the most frequently performed gynecological surgical procedures. At the time of operation, the majority of patients are premenopausal and sexually active. Hence, detailed counseling about the effects of hysterectomy on postoperative sexuality and quality of life can be regarded as an integral part of preoperative counseling. However, available data on these subjects are limited and contradictory. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess quality of life and sexuality following three common hysterectomy procedures-total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy (SLH), and vaginal hysterectomy (VH)-in premenopausal patients using the European Quality of Life Five-Dimension Scale (EQ-5D) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative EQ-5D and FSFI scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Kruskal-Wallis analysis and Mann-Whitney U-test with post hoc Bonferroni correction were used to assess differences among the three subgroups.
METHODS: All premenopausal patients who underwent TLH, SLH, or VH without adnexectomy due to benign uterine disorders between April 2011 and June 2013 at the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of Saarland University Hospital were enrolled in this observational cohort study. Sexuality and quality of life status were assessed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively using two standardized validated questionnaires: the FSFI, a multidimensional, self-reported instrument for the assessment of female sexual function, and the EQ-5D, a standardized, validated instrument to measure an individual's health status.
RESULTS: Of 402 eligible patients, 237 completed the study. Patient characteristics and preoperative FSFI and EQ-5D scores did not differ among the three hysterectomy subgroups. Postoperative FSFI and EQ-5D scores were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.01) than preoperative scores for all procedures but did not differ among the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of premenopausal women, hysterectomy without adnexectomy performed due to benign uterine pathologies had significant positive effects on postoperative sexual function and quality of life, regardless of the surgical technique used.
© 2014 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynaecology; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Quality of Life; Sexual Function; Sexuality

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25042204     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  16 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Gian A Binda; Alessandro Montedori; Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Cirocchi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-25

2.  Perioperative outcome and female sexual function after laparoscopic transvaginal NOTES-assisted nephrectomy.

Authors:  Lluis Peri; Mireia Musquera; Antoni Vilaseca; Eduard Garcia-Cruz; Maria J Ribal; Albert Carrión; Roberto Castañeda; Antonio Alcaraz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The influence of conventional and extended supracervical hysterectomy on sexuality and quality of life parameters: a prospective bi-center study with a special focus on postoperative spotting.

Authors:  C Spüntrup; M Banerjee; M Bordelius; M Hellmich; J Bojahr; B Bojahr; C Albus; G Noé
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Sexual function after hysterectomy according to surgical indication: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sara R Till; Andrew Schrepf; Jennifer Pierce; Stephanie Moser; Ellen Kolarik; Chad Brummett; Sawsan As-Sanie
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.994

5.  Influence of the Preoperative Decision-Making Process on the Postoperative Outcome after Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Pathologies.

Authors:  J C Radosa; C G Radosa; C Kastl; R Mavrova; L Gabriel; S Gräber; G Wagenpfeil; S Baum; A Hamza; R Joukhadar; I Juhasz-Böss; A-S Heimes; G Meyberg-Solomayer; E-F Solomayer; M P Radosa
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 6.  Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Disease.

Authors:  Klaus J Neis; Wolfgang Zubke; Mathias Fehr; Thomas Römer; Karl Tamussino; Monika Nothacker
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Postoperative Quality of Life and Sexual Function in Premenopausal Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Myomectomy for Symptomatic Fibroids: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Julia Caroline Radosa; Christoph Georg Radosa; Russalina Mavrova; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Amr Hamza; Ralf Joukhadar; Sascha Baum; Maria Karsten; Ingolf Juhasz-Boess; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Marc Philipp Radosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Recovery time period and quality of life after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Raden Khairiyatul Afiyah; Chatarina Umbul Wahyuni; Budi Prasetyo; Didik Dwi Winarno
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2020-07-02

9.  Age should not be a limiting factor in laparoscopic surgery: a prospective multicenter cohort study on quality of life after laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Justine M Briët; Marian Je Mourits; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Edwin R van den Heuvel; Monique Ja Kenkhuis; Henriette Jg Arts; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomies and of abdominal hysterectomies: a case study of 4,895 patients in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Authors:  Hongying He; Zhijun Yang; Dingyuan Zeng; Jiangtao Fan; Xiaoxia Hu; Yuan Ye; Hua Bai; Yanming Jiang; Zhong Lin; Zhiying Lei; Xinlin Li; Lian Li; Jinghua Gan; Ying Lan; Xiongzhi Tang; Danxia Wang; Junsong Jiang; Xiaoyan Wu; Meiying Li; Xiaoqing Ren; Xiaomin Yang; Mei Liu; Qinmei Wang; Fuyan Jiang; Li Li
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.