Literature DB >> 35226281

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale in Brazilian Portuguese.

Jane Palmeira Nóbrega Cavalcanti1, Tatiana de Paula Santana da Silva2, Everton Botelho Sougey2.   

Abstract

The Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale (PDIS) assesses how people perceive infidelity through specific behaviors. Originally developed by Wilson et al. (2011), it contains 12 items distributed into three factors: (1) ambiguous, (2) deceptive, and (3) explicit behaviors. In the present research, translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the PDIS in Brazilian Portuguese were performed. First, qualitative analyses took place: translation, translation synthesis, content validation, pre-test, and reverse translation. Then, quantitative analyses were conducted: psychometric parameter tests with confirmatory factor analysis and reliability. A total of 252 participants were recruited, 160 of whom were female (63.5%). The results indicated consistent PDIS adequacy (conceptual and idiomatic equivalences); satisfactory content validity coefficients regarding language clarity, practical pertinence, and theoretical relevance; and an almost perfect level of consensus regarding the theoretical dimension. The application of the pre-test was proven to be a good parameter for estimating the comprehension of the instrument in the culture for which it was intended. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good indices of adjustment quality of the tested trifactorial model (three factors being identified with ambiguous, deceptive, and explicit behaviors). Therefore, the structure indicated in the original version was corroborated and the instrument's reliability confirmed. The Brazilian Portuguese PDIS is a useful tool for evaluating infidelity perceptions in the Brazilian culture.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-cultural adaptation; Infidelity; Jealousy; Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35226281     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02253-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  16 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The evolution of jealousy.

Authors:  David M Buss; Martie Haselton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Infidelity in committed relationships II: a substantive review.

Authors:  Adrian J Blow; Kelley Hartnett
Journal:  J Marital Fam Ther       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.

Authors:  David M Buss; David P Schmitt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  The Crisis in Content Validity Among Existing Measures of Transphobia.

Authors:  Thomas J Billard
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2018-03-12

6.  Sexual and Emotional Infidelity: Evolved Gender Differences in Jealousy Prove Robust and Replicable.

Authors:  David M Buss
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Upset Over Sexual versus Emotional Infidelity Among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Adults.

Authors:  David A Frederick; Melissa R Fales
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2014-12-18

9.  Gender-typical responses to sexual and emotional infidelity as a function of mortality salience induced self-esteem striving.

Authors:  Jamie L Goldenberg; Mark J Landau; Tom Pyszczynski; Cathy R Cox; Jeff Greenberg; Sheldon Solomon; Heather Dunnam
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-12

10.  Online infidelity: The new challenge to marriages.

Authors:  Angelina Mao; Ahalya Raguram
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.