Literature DB >> 30230999

Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.

David M Buss1, David P Schmitt2.   

Abstract

Evolved mate preferences comprise a central causal process in Darwin's theory of sexual selection. Their powerful influences have been documented in all sexually reproducing species, including in sexual strategies in humans. This article reviews the science of human mate preferences and their myriad behavioral manifestations. We discuss sex differences and sex similarities in human sexual psychology, which vary according to short-term and long-term mating contexts. We review context-specific shifts in mating strategy depending on individual, social, and ecological qualities such as mate value, life history strategy, sex ratio, gender economic inequality, and cultural norms. We review the empirical evidence for the impact of mate preferences on actual mating decisions. Mate preferences also dramatically influence tactics of mate attraction, tactics of mate retention, patterns of deception, causes of sexual regret, attraction to cues to sexual exploitability, attraction to cues to fertility, attraction to cues to resources and protection, derogation of competitors, causes of breakups, and patterns of remarriage. We conclude by articulating unresolved issues and offer a future agenda for the science of human mating, including how humans invent novel cultural technologies to better implement ancient sexual strategies and how cultural evolution may be dramatically influencing our evolved mating psychology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolutionary psychology; human mating; mate preferences; sex differences; sexual strategies

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30230999     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  36 in total

1.  Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.

Authors:  Susan M Hughes; Toe Aung; Marissa A Harrison; Jack N LaFayette; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-05-21

2.  Do young dating app users and non-users differ in mating orientations?

Authors:  Juan Ramón Barrada; Ángel Castro; Elena Fernández Del Río; Pedro J Ramos-Villagrasa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love.

Authors:  Adam Bode; Geoff Kushnick
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-12

4.  Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Perceptions of Dating Infidelity Scale in Brazilian Portuguese.

Authors:  Jane Palmeira Nóbrega Cavalcanti; Tatiana de Paula Santana da Silva; Everton Botelho Sougey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 5.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Testing Women's Trust in Other Women and Same-Sex Attracted Males in Three Cultures.

Authors:  Scott W Semenyna; Francisco R Gómez Jiménez; Paul L Vasey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-09-08

7.  The pandemic exposes human nature: 10 evolutionary insights.

Authors:  Benjamin M Seitz; Athena Aktipis; David M Buss; Joe Alcock; Paul Bloom; Michele Gelfand; Sam Harris; Debra Lieberman; Barbara N Horowitz; Steven Pinker; David Sloan Wilson; Martie G Haselton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.

Authors:  Ray Garza; Jennifer Byrd-Craven
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-14

Review 9.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior.

Authors:  Adam C Davis; Steven Arnocky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-10-06

10.  Sex differences in human mate preferences vary across sex ratios.

Authors:  Kathryn V Walter; Daniel Conroy-Beam; David M Buss; Kelly Asao; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Piotr Sorokowski; Toivo Aavik; Grace Akello; Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba; Charlotte Alm; Naumana Amjad; Afifa Anjum; Chiemezie S Atama; Derya Atamtürk Duyar; Richard Ayebare; Carlota Batres; Mons Bendixen; Aicha Bensafia; Boris Bizumic; Mahmoud Boussena; Marina Butovskaya; Seda Can; Katarzyna Cantarero; Antonin Carrier; Hakan Cetinkaya; Ilona Croy; Rosa María Cueto; Marcin Czub; Daria Dronova; Seda Dural; Izzet Duyar; Berna Ertugrul; Agustín Espinosa; Ignacio Estevan; Carla Sofia Esteves; Luxi Fang; Tomasz Frackowiak; Jorge Contreras Garduño; Karina Ugalde González; Farida Guemaz; Petra Gyuris; Mária Halamová; Iskra Herak; Marina Horvat; Ivana Hromatko; Chin-Ming Hui; Jas Laile Jaafar; Feng Jiang; Konstantinos Kafetsios; Tina Kavčič; Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair; Nicolas Kervyn; Truong Thi Khanh Ha; Imran Ahmed Khilji; Nils C Köbis; Hoang Moc Lan; András Láng; Georgina R Lennard; Ernesto León; Torun Lindholm; Trinh Thi Linh; Giulia Lopez; Nguyen Van Luot; Alvaro Mailhos; Zoi Manesi; Rocio Martinez; Sarah L McKerchar; Norbert Meskó; Girishwar Misra; Conal Monaghan; Emanuel C Mora; Alba Moya-Garófano; Bojan Musil; Jean Carlos Natividade; Agnieszka Niemczyk; George Nizharadze; Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Anna Oleszkiewicz; Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee; Ike E Onyishi; Baris Özener; Ariela Francesca Pagani; Vilmante Pakalniskiene; Miriam Parise; Farid Pazhoohi; Annette Pisanski; Katarzyna Pisanski; Edna Ponciano; Camelia Popa; Pavol Prokop; Muhammad Rizwan; Mario Sainz; Svjetlana Salkičević; Ruta Sargautyte; Ivan Sarmány-Schuller; Susanne Schmehl; Shivantika Sharad; Razi Sultan Siddiqui; Franco Simonetti; Stanislava Yordanova Stoyanova; Meri Tadinac; Marco Antonio Correa Varella; Christin-Melanie Vauclair; Luis Diego Vega; Dwi Ajeng Widarini; Gyesook Yoo; Marta Marta Zaťková; Maja Zupančič
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.